A Potential Tale of Two-by-Two Tables From Completely Randomized Experiments

REFERENCES

• Angrist, J.D., Imbens, G.W., Rubin, D.B. (1996), Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables ( with discussion), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronow, P. A., Green, D. P., and Lee, D. K. K. (2014), “Sharp Bounds on the Variance in Randomized Experiments,” Annals of Statistics, 42, 850–871.
   Google Scholar
• Berkson, J. (1978), Do the Marginal Totals of the 2× 2 Table Contain Relevant Information Respecting the Table Proportions? ( with discussion), Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2, 43–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissler, J.J., Kingswood, J. C., Radzikowska, E., Zonnenberg, B. A., Frost, M., Belousova, E., Sauter, M., Nonomura, N., Brakemeier, S., de Vries, P. J., Whittemore, V. H., Chen, D., Sahmoud, T., Shah, G., Lincy, J., Lebwohl, D., and Budde, K. (2013), Everolimus for Angiomyolipoma Associated With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex or Sporadic Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (EXIST-2): A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial, The Lancet, 381, 817–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoff, H. (2004), Information, for Testing the Equality of Two Probabilities, From the Margins of the 2× 2 Table, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 121, 209–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, W.G. (1977), Sampling Techniques, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Copas, J.B. (1973), Randomization Models for the Matched and Unmatched 2× 2 Tables, Biometrika, 60, 467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornfield, J. (1959), Principles of Research, American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 64, 240–252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (1958),” Planning of Experiments, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, T., Pillai, N., Rubin, D.B. ( in press), Causal Inference From 2k Factorial Designs Using the Potential Outcomes Model, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, . Series B.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, P. (2014), A Paradox From Randomization-Based Causal Inference. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0142.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.A. (1935a), The Design of Experiments ( 1st ed.), Oxford, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1935b), The Logic of Inductive Inference, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 98, 39–82.
   Google Scholar
• Gadbury, G.L. (2001), Randomization Inference and Bias of Standard Errors, The American Statistician, 55, 310–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland, S. (1991), “On the Logical Justification of Conditional Tests for Two-by-Two Contingency Tables,” The American Statistician, 45, 247–251.
   Google Scholar
• Kempthorne, O. (1952), The Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E.L., and Romano, J.P. (2006), Testing Statistical Hypotheses, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Neyman, J. (1923), On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles ( with discussion), Statistical Science, 5, 465–480; . Section 9 (translated).
   Google Scholar
• Robins, J.M. (1988), Confidence Intervals for Causal Parameters, Statistics in Medicine, 7, 773–785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002), Observational Studies, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B. (1983), The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects, Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, K.J., Greenland, S., and Lash, T.L. (2008), Modern Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D.B. (1974), Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies, Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1977), Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate, Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1978), Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization, The Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1980), Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test by D. Basu, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 591–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1984), Bayesianly Justifiable and Relevant Frequency Calculations for the Applied Statistician, The Annals of Statistics, 12, 1151–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1990), Neyman (1923) and Causal Inference in Experiments and Observational Studies, Statistical Science, 5, 472–480.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2005), Causal Inference Using Potential Outcomes: Design, Modeling, and Decisions, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 322–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2010), Reflections Stimulated by the Comments of Shadish (2010) and West and Thoemmes (2010), Psychological Methods, 15, 38–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), Potential Updates to Cornfield’s 1959 “Principles of Research, Statistics in Medicine, 31, 2778–2779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, B. (1955), On Estimating the Relation Between Blood Group and Disease, Annals of Human Genetics, 19, 251–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, F. (1984), Tests of Significance for 2× 2 Contingency Tables ( with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, . Series A, 147, 426–463.
   Google Scholar