Pairwise Likelihood Inference for Nested Hidden Markov Chain Models for Multilevel Longitudinal Data

REFERENCES

• Akaike, H. (1973), “Information Theory as an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle,” in Second International Symposium on Information Theory, eds. B.N. Petrov and F.Csaki, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp. 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, R.M. (2007), “Mixed Hidden Markov Models: An Extension of the Hidden Markov Model to the Longitudinal Data Setting,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov, T., and Muthén, B. (2008), “Multilevel Mixture Models,” in Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models, eds. G.R. Hancock and K.M. Samuelson, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 27–51.
   Google Scholar
• Avriel, M. (2003), Nonlinear Programming: Analysis and Methods, New York: Dover Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F. (2006), “Likelihood Inference for a Class of Latent Markov Models Under Linear Hypotheses on the Transition Probabilities,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 68, 155–178.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F., Bacci, S., and Pennoni, F. (2014), “Longitudinal Analysis of Self-Reported Health Status by Mixture Latent Auto-Regressive Models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 63, 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F., Colombi, R., and Forcina, A. (2007), “An Extended Class of Marginal Link Functions for Modelling Contingency Tables by Equality and Inequality Constraints,” Statistica Sinica, 17, 691–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F., and Farcomeni, A. (2009), “A Multivariate Extension of the Dynamic Logit Model for Longitudinal Data Based on a Latent Markov Heterogeneity Structure,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 816–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F., Farcomeni, A., and Pennoni, F. (2013), Latent Markov Models for Longitudinal Data, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F., Lupparelli, M., and Montanari, G.E. (2009), “Latent Markov Model for Binary Longitudinal Data: An Application to the Performance Evaluation of Nursing Homes,” Annals of Applied Statistics, 3, 611–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F., Pennoni, F., and Vittadini, G. (2011), “Assessment of School Performance Through a Multilevel Latent Markov Rasch Model,” Journal of Educational and Behavioural Statistics, 36, 491–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, L.E., Petrie, T., Soules, G., and Weiss, N. (1970), “A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Besag, J. (1974), “Spatial Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of Lattice Systems,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36, 192–236.
   Google Scholar
• Bulla, J., and Berzel, A. (2008), “Computational Issues in Parameter Estimation for Stationary Hidden Markov Models,” Computational Statistics, 23, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D.R., and Reid, N. (2004), “A Note on Pseudolikelihood Constructed from Marginal Densities,” Biometrika, 91, 729–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., and Rubin, D.B. (1977), “Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Diggle, P.J., Heagerty, P., Liang, K.Y., and Zeger, S.L. (2002), Analysis of Longitudinal Data, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice, G., Davidian, M., Verbeke, G., and Molenberghs, G. (2009), Longitudinal Data Analysis, London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frees, E.W. (2004), Longitudinal and Panel Data: Analysis and Applications in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X., and Song, P. X.-K. (2010), “Composite Likelihood Bayesian Information Criteria for Model Selection in High-Dimensional Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 1531–1540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2011), “Composite Likelihood EM Algorithm with Applications to Multivariate Hidden Markov Model,” Statistica Sinica, 21, 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2011), Multilevel Statistical Models (4th ed.), Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hanfelt, J.J. (2004), “Composite Conditional Likelihood for Sparse Clustered Data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66, 259–273.
   Google Scholar
• Heiss, F. (2008), “Sequential Numerical Integration in Nonlinear State Space Models for Microeconometric Panel Data,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23, 373–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjort, N.L., and Varin, C. (2008), “ML, PL, QL in Markov Chain Models,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 35, 64–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. (2003), Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juang, B.H., and Rabiner, L.R. (1991), “Hidden Markov Models for Speech Recognition,” Technometrics, 33, 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khreich, W., Granger, E., Miri, A., and Sabourin, R. (2010), “On the Memory Complexity of the Forward-Backward Algorithm,” Pattern Recognition Letters, 31, 91–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk, A. Y.C., and Nott, D.J. (2000), “A Pairwise Likelihood Approach to Analyzing Correlated Binary Data,” Statistics and Probability Letters, 47, 329–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagona, F., Maruotti, A., and Padovano, F. (2015), “Multilevel Multivariate Modelling of Legislative Count Data, with a Hidden Markov Chain,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 178, 705–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S.E., Rabiner, L.R., and Sondhi, M.M. (1983), “An Introduction to the Application of the Theory of Probabilistic Functions of a Markov Process to Automatic Speech Recognition,” Bell System Technical Journal, 62, 1035–1074.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B.G. (1982), “Conditional Score Functions: Some Optimality Results,” Biometrika, 69, 503–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1988), “Composite Likelihood Methods,” Contemporary Mathematics, 80, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Maruotti, A. (2011), “Mixed Hidden Markov Models for Longitudinal Data: An Overview,” International Statistical Review, 79, 427–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J.A. (1989), Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.), London: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, R.B. (1956), “Efficient Estimation and Local Identification in Latent Class Analysis,” Psychometrika, 21, 331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenberghs, G., and Verbeke, G. (2004), “Meaningful Statistical Model Formulations for Repeated Measures,” Statistica Sinica, 14, 989–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., and Asparouhov, T. (2009), “Multilevel Regression Mixture Analysis,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 172, 639–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2011), LTA in Mplus: Transition Probabilities Influenced by Covariates. Mplus Web Notes, No. 13. Available at https://www.statmodel.com/examples/LTAwebnote.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Renard, D., Molenberghs, G., and Geys, H. (2004), “A Pairwise Likelihood Approach to Estimation in Multilevel Probit Models,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 44, 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, T.J. (1971), “Identification in Parametric Models,” Econometrica, 39, 577–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978), “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., and Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2013), “Handling Initial Conditions and Endogenous Covariates in Dynamic/Transition Models for Binary Data with Unobserved Heterogeneity,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 63, 211–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pol, F., and Langeheine, R. (1990), “Mixed Markov Latent Class Models,” Sociological Methodology, 20, 213–247.
   Google Scholar
• Varin, C. (2008), “On Composite Marginal Likelihoods,” AStA, 92, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Varin, C., and Czado, C. (2010), “A Mixed Autoregressive Probit Model for Ordinal Longitudinal Data,” Biostatistics, 11, 127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varin, C., Reid, N., and Firth, D. (2011), “An Overview of Composite Likelihood Methods,” Statistica Sinica, 21, 5–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varin, C., and Vidoni, P. (2005), “A Note on the Composite Likelihood Inference and Model Selection,” Biometrika, 92, 519–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J.K. (2003), “Multilevel Latent Class Models,” Sociological Methodology, 33, 213–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J.K., and Magidson, J. (2005), Latent GOLD 4.0 User’s Guide, Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Viterbi, A.J. (1967), “Error Bounds for Convolutional Codes and an Asymptotically Optimum Decoding Algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13, 260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucchini, W., and MacDonald, I.L. (2009), Hidden Markov Models for Time Series: An Introduction Using R, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar