Some Counterclaims Undermine Themselves in Observational Studies

REFERENCES

• Cornfield, J., Haenszel, W., Hammond, E., Lilienfeld, A., Shimkin, M., and Wynder, E. (1959), “Smoking and Lung Cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 173–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egleston, B.L., Scharfstein, D.O., and MacKenzie, E. (2009), “On Estimation of the Survivor Average Causal Effect in Observational Studies When Important Confounders are Missing Due to Death,” Biometrics, 65, 497–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, L. (1986), “The Effectiveness of Safety Belts in Preventing Fatalities,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 18, 229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatal Accident Reporting System (2010), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.A. (1935), The Design of Experiments, Edinburgh, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Gastwirth, J.L. (1992), “Methods for Assessing the Sensitivity of Statistical Comparisons Used in Title VII Cases to Omitted Variables,” Jurimetrics, 33, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, P., Bosch, R., and Hudgens, M. (2003), “Sensitivity Analysis for the Assessment of the Causal Vaccine Effects on Viral Load in HIV Vaccine Trials,” Biometrics, 59, 531–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernán, M.A., and Robins, J.M. (1999), “Letter to the Editor,” Biometrics, 55, 1316–1317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosman, C.A., Hansen, B.B., and Holland, P. W.H. (2010), “The Sensitivity of Linear Regression Coefficients’ Confidence Limits to the Omission of a Confounder,” The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4, 849–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J.Y., and Small, D.S. (2013), “Calibrating Sensitivity Analyses to Observed Covariates in Observational Studies,” Biometrics, 69, 803–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J.Y., Small, D.S., and Rosenbaum, P.R. (2013), “Effect Modification and Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 108, 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Keele, L., and Yamamoto, T. (2010), “Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects,” Statistical Science, 25, 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D.Y., Psaty, B.M., and Kronmal, R.A. (1998), “Assessing the Sensitivity of Regression Results to Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies,” Biometrics, 54, 948–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Kuramoto, J., and Stuart, E. (2013), “Sensitivity Analysis for Unobserved Confounding in Nonexperimental Prevention Research,” Prevention Science, 14, 570–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maritz, J.S. (1979), “A Note on Exact Robust Confidence Intervals for Location,” Biometrika, 66, 163–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyman, J. (1923), “On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments,” Statistical Science, 1990, 463–480.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, A., Hudgens, M.G., Gilbert, P.B., and Fine, J.P. (2014), “Nonparametric Bounds and Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effects,” Statistical Science, 29, 596–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D. (2000), “Plausible Rival Hypotheses in Measurement, Design, and Scientific Theory,” in Research Design, ed. L. Bickman, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, J., Rotnitzky, A., and Scharfstein, D. (2000), “Sensitivity Analysis for Selection Bias and Unmeasured Confounding in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models,” in Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment, and Clinical Trials, New York: Springer, pp. 1–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R. (1984), “The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that has been Affected by the Treatment, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 147, 656–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002a), Observational Studies (2nd ed.), New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R. (2002b), “Covariance Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies” (with discussion), Statistical Science, 17, 286–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R. (2005), “Heterogeneity and Causality,” The American Statistician, 59, 147–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R. (2007), “Sensitivity Analysis for m-estimates, Tests and Confidence Intervals in Matched Observational Studies,” Biometrics, 63, 456–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2013), “Impact of Multiple Matched Controls on Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies,” Biometrics, 69, 118–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2014), “Weighted M-statistics With Superior Design Sensitivity in Matched Observational Studies With Multiple Controls,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109, 1145–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2015), “Bahadur Efficiency of Sensitivity Analyses in Observational Studies,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110, 205–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D.B. (1974), “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfstein, D.O., Rotnitzky, A., and Robins, J.M. (1999), “Adjusting for Non-ignorable Drop-out Using Semiparametric Non-response Models,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1096–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivak, M., Schoettle, B., Reed, M., and Flannagan, M. (2006), “Influence of Visibility Out of the Vehicle Cabin on Lane-Change Crashes,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38, 969–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E.A., and Hanna, D.B. (2013), “Should Epidemiologists be More Sensitive to Design Sensitivity? Epidemiology, 24, 88–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B.B., and Gastwirth, J.L. (2005), “Sensitivity Analysis for Trend Tests: Application to the Risk of Radiation Exposure,” Biostatistics, 6, 201–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaykin, D.V., Zhivotovsky, L.A., Westfall, P.H., and Weir, B.S. (2002), “Trucated Product Method of Combining P -values,” Genetic Epidemiology, 22, 170–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubizarreta, J.R., Cerdá, M., and Rosenbaum, P.R. (2013), “Effect of the 2010 Chilean Earthquake on Posttraumatic Stress,” Epidemiology, 24, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar