Randomized Controlled Field Trials of Predictive Policing

REFERENCES

• Bowers, K. (2014), Risky Facilities: Crime Radiators or Crime Absorbers? A Comparison of Internal and External Levels of Theft, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 389–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K.J., Johnson, S.D., Pease, K. (2004), Prospective Hot-Spotting the Future of Crime Mapping? British Journal of Criminology, 44, 641–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, A.A. (2005), Hot Spots Policing and Crime Prevention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials, Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 317–342.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, A.A., Bond, B.J. (2008), Policing Crime and Disorder Hot Spots: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Criminology, 46, 577–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P.J., and Brantingham, P.L. (1981), Environmental Criminology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P.L., and Brantingham, P.J. (1991), “Notes on the Geometry of Crime,” in Environmental Criminology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 27–54.
   Google Scholar
• Burges, C. J.C. (2010), From Ranknet to Lambdarank to Lambdamart: An Overview, Learning, 11, 23–581.
   Google Scholar
• Chainey, S., and Ratcliffe, J. (2005), GIS and Crime Mapping, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chainey, S., Tompson, L., Uhlig, S. (2008), The Utility of Hotspot Mapping for Predicting Spatial Patterns of Crime, Security Journal, 21, 4–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck, J.E., Clarke, R.V., Guerette, R.T. (2007), Risky Facilities: Crime Concentration in Homogeneous Sets of Establishments and Facilities, Crime Prevention Studies, 21, 225.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, G., and Pease, K. (1993), Once Bitten, Twice Bitten: Repeat Victimisation and Its Implications for Crime Prevention, London: Police Research Group, Crime Prevention Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, D.P., Welsh, B.C. (2005), Randomized Experiments in Criminology: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 9–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, M., Jones, V. (2012), ‘Disrupting the Optimal Forager’: Predictive Risk Mapping and Domestic Burglary Reduction in Trafford, Greater Manchester, International Journal of Police Science & Management, 14, 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, R.R., Rosenfeld, R., Borissova, N. (2010), Improving Crime Data Project, Technical Report, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, A. (2014), On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette, R.T., Bowers, K.J. (2009), Assessing the Extent of Crime Displacement and Diffusion of Benefits: A Review of Situational Crime Prevention Evaluations, Criminology, 47, 1331–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G.W., List, J.A. (2004), Field Experiments, Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J.J. (2008), Econometric Causality, International Statistical Review, 76, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (2008), Repeat Burglary Victimisation: A Tale of Two Theories, Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 215–240.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.D., Bernasco, W., Bowers, K.J., Elffers, H., Ratcliffe, J., Rengert, G., Townsley, M. (2007), Space–Time Patterns of Risk: A Cross National Assessment of Residential Burglary Victimization, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.D., Birks, D.J., McLaughlin, L., Bowers, K.J., and Pease, K. (2007), Prospective Crime Mapping in Operational Context: Final Report, London: Great Britain Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S.D., Bowers, K.J., Birks, D.J., and Pease, K. (2009), “Predictive Mapping of Crime by Promap: Accuracy, Units of Analysis, and the Environmental Backcloth,” in Putting Crime in Its Place, New York: Springer, pp. 171–198.
   Google Scholar
• Keizer, K. (2008), Siegwart Lindenberg, and Linda Steg. The Spreading of Disorder, Science, 322, 1681–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelling, G.L., Pate, T., Dieckman, D., and Brown, C.E. (1974), The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment, Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D.M. (1996), Pulling Levers: Chronic Offenders, High-Crime Settings, and a Theory of Prevention, Valparaiso University Law Review, 31, 449.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, L.W., Caplan, J.M., Piza, E. (2011), Risk Clusters, Hotspots, and Spatial Intelligence: Risk Terrain Modeling as an Algorithm for Police Resource Allocation Strategies, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 339–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, R.E. (1982), Experimental Design, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Koper, C. (1995), Just Enough Police Presence: Reducing Crime and Disorderly Behavior by Optimizing Patrol Time in Crime Hot Spots, Justice Quarterly, 12, 649–672.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, E., Mohler, G. (2011), A Nonparametric EM Algorithm for Multiscale Hawkes Processes, in Proceedings of the 2011 Joint Statistical Meetings, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Brown, D.E. (2003), Criminal Incident Prediction Using a Point-Pattern-Based Density Model, International Journal of Forecasting, 19, 603–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsan, D., Lengline, O. (2008), Extending Earthquakes’ Reach Through Cascading, Science, 319, 1076–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsueda, R.L., Kreager, D.A., Huizinga, D. (2006), Deterring Delinquents: A Rational Choice Model of Theft and Violence, American Sociological Review, 71, 95–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollister, K.E., French, M.T., Fang, H. (2010), The Cost of Crime to Society: New Crime-Specific Estimates for Policy and Program Evaluation, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 108, 98–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler, G. (2014), Marked Point Process Hotspot Maps for Homicide and Gun Crime Prediction in Chicago, International Journal of Forecasting, 30, 491–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler, G., Short, M.B., Brantingham, P.J., Schoenberg, F.P., Tita, G.E. (2011), Self-Exciting Point Process Modeling of Crime, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 106, 100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosher, C.J., Miethe, T.D., and Hart, T.C. (2010), The Mismeasure of Crime, Thousand OaksCA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Centre for Policing Excellence (2005), Guidance on the National Intelligence Model, London: National Centre for Policing Excellence, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, T.C., Nicholls, J.K., Archer, J., Hughes, E., and Tatum, J. (2003), Crime Analysis in America: Findings and Recommendations, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J.H. (2012), Intelligence-Led Policing, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, J.H., Taniguchi, T., Groff, E.R., Wood, J.D. (2011), The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Police Patrol Effectiveness in Violent Crime Hotspots, Criminology, 49, 795–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reaves, B.A. (2010), Local Police Departments, 2007, Bureau of Justice Statistics Report NCJ 231174, Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., Earls, F. (1997), Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy, Science, 277, 918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.W., Gartin, P.R., Buerger, M.E. (1989), Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place, Criminology, 27, 27–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.W., Weisburd, D. (1995), General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime? Hot Spots?: A Randomized, Controlled Trial, Justice Quarterly, 12, 625–648.
   Google Scholar
• Short, M.B., Brantingham, P.J., Bertozzi, A.L., Tita, G.E. (2010), Dissipation and Displacement of Hotspots in Reaction-Diffusion Models of Crime, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 3961–3965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telep, C.W., Mitchell, R.J., Weisburd, D. (2014), How Much Time Should the Police Spend at Crime Hot Spots? Answers From a Police Agency Directed Randomized Field Trial in Sacramento, California, Justice Quarterly, 31, 905–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompson, L., Townsley, M. (2010), (Looking) Back to the Future: Using Space-time Patterns to Better Predict the Location of Street Crime, International Journal of Police Science & Management, 12, 23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Townsley, M., Homel, R., Chaseling, J. (2003), Infectious Burglaries: A Test of the Near Repeat Hypothesis, British Journal of Criminology, 43, 615–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veen, A., Schoenberg, F.P. (2008), Estimation of Space-Time Branching Process Models in Seismology Using an EM-Type Algorithm, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 614–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, W.F. (2001), Compstat: An Analysis of an Emerging Police Managerial Paradigm, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 24, 347–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Brown, D.E. (2012), The Spatio-Temporal Modeling for Criminal Incidents, Security Informatics, 1, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, R., and Bangs, M. (2007), The Use of Geographic Information Systems by Crime Analysts in England and Wales, London: Great Britain Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D. (2008), Place-Based Policing, Ideas in American Policing, 9, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Eck, J.E. (2004), What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisburd, D., Wyckoff, L.A., Ready, J., Eck, J.E., Hinkle, J.C., Gajewski, F. (2006), Does Crime Just Move Around the Corner? A Controlled Study of Spatial Displacement and Diffusion of Crime Control Benefits, Criminology, 44, 549–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar