Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-Level Information From External Big Data Sources

REFERENCES

• Bell, W.R., Datta, G.S., and Ghosh, M. (2013), “Benchmarking Small Area Estimators,” Biometrika, 100, 189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2006), “Commonly Studied Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer: Results From the Breast Cancer Association Consortium,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98, 1382–1396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breslow, N.E., and Holubkov, R. (1997), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Logistic Regression Parameters Under Two-Phase, Outcome-Dependent Sampling,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 59, 447–461.
   Google Scholar
• Canzian, F., Cox, D., Setiawan, V.W., Stram, D., Ziegler, R., Dossus, L., Beckmann, L., Blanch, H., Barricarte, A., Berg, C., Bingham, S., Buring, J., Buys, S., Calle, E., Chanock, S., Clavel-Chapelon, F., DeLancey, J., Diver, W., Dorronsoro, M., Haiman, C., Hallmans, G., Hankinson, S., Hunter, D., Hsing, A., Isaacs, C., Khaw, K., Kolonel, L., Kraft, P., Le Marchand, L., Lund, E., Overvad, K., Panico, S., Peeters, P., Pollak, M., Thun, M., Tnneland, A., Trichopoulos, D., Tumino, R., Yeager, M., Hoover, R., Riboli, E., Thomas, G., Henderson, B., Kaaks, R., and Feigelson, H. (2010), “Comprehensive Analysis of Common Genetic Variation in 61 Genes Related to Steroid Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Metabolism and Breast Cancer Risk in the NCI Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium,” Human Molecular Genetics, 19, 3873–3884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Ayyagari, R., Chatterjee, N., Pee, D.Y., Schairer, C., Byrne, C., Gail, M.H. (2008), “Breast Cancer Relative Hazard Estimates From Case-Control and Cohort Designs With Missing Data on Mammographic Density,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 976–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Pee, D., Ayyagari, R., Graubard, B., Schairer, C., Byrne, C., Benichou, J., and Gail, M.H. (2006), “Projecting Absolute Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in White Women With a Model That Includes Mammographic Density,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98, 1215–1226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, Y.-H., and Chen, H. (2000), “A Unified Approach to Regression Analysis Under Double Sampling Design,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 62, 449–460.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, A.C., and Wainwright, K. (1984), Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics (3rd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Deville, J.C., and Sarndal, C.E. (1992), “Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 376–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frangakis, C. (2009), “The Calibration of Treatment From Clinical Trials to Target Populations,” Clinical Trials, 6, 136–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, J.B., Kaizar, E.E., Kelleher, K., Seltman, H., and Gardner, W. (2008), “Generalizing From Clinical Trial Data: A Case Study: The Risk of Suicidality Among Pediatric Antidepressant Users,” Statistics in Medicine, 27, 1801–1813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, E., Grieve, R., Ramsahai, R., and Sekhon, J. (2015), “From SATT to PATT: Combining Experimental With Observational Studies to Estimate Population Treatment Effects,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 178, 757–778.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. (1967), “The Behavior of the Maximum Likelihood Estimates Under Nonstandard Conditions,” in Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 111), Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Imbens, G.W., and Lancaster, T.W. (1994), “Combining Micro and Macro Data in Microeconomic Models,” Review of Economic Studies, 61, 655–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiding, N., and Clayton, D. (2014), “Standardization and Control for Confounding in Observational Studies: A Historical Perspective,” Statistical Science, 29, 529–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, J.F., Wild, C.J., and Kalbfleisch, J.D. (1999), “Semiparametric Methods for Response-Selective and Missing Data Problems in Regression,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 61, 413–438.
   Google Scholar
• Lumley, T., Shaw, P.A., and Dai, J.Y. (2011), “Connections Between Survey Calibration Estimators and Semiparametric Models for Incomplete Data,” International Statistical Review, 79, 200–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugglin, A., and Carlin, B. (1998), “Hierarchical Modeling in Geographic Information Systems: Population Interpolation Over Incompatible Zones,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 111–130.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J., and Bareinboim, E. (2014), “External Validity: From Do-Calculus to Transportability Across Populations,” Statistical Science, 29, 579–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, R.L., and Pyke, R. (1979), “Logistic Disease Incidence Models and Case-Control Studies,” Biometrika, 66, 403–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J. (2000), “Combining Parametric and Empirical Likelihoods,” Biometrika, 87, 484–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., and Lawless, J. (1994), “Empirical Likelihood and General Estimating Equations,” Annals of Statistics, 22, 300–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., Zhang, H., Li, P., Albanes, D., and Yu, K. (2015), “Using Covariate-Specific Disease Prevalence Information to Increase the Power of Case-Control Studies,” Biometrika, 102, 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, J.M., Rotnitzky, A., and Zhao, L.P. (1994), “Estimation of Regression Coefficients When Some Regressors Are Not Always Observed,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 846–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeder, K., Carroll, R.J., and Lindsay, B.G. (1996), “A Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Approach to Case-Control Studies With Errors in Covariables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 722–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A.J., and Wild, C J. (1997), “Fitting Regression Models to Case-Control Data by Maximum Likelihood,” Biometrika, 84, 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E.A., Cole, S.R., Bradshaw, C.P., and Leaf, P.J. (2011), “The Use of Propensity Scores to Assess the Generalizability of Results From Randomized Trials,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 174, 369–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. (1982), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified Models,” Econometrica, 50, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. (2003), “Optimal Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling,” Biometrika, 90, 937–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C., and Sitter, R.R. (2001), “A Model-Calibration Approach to Using Complete Auxiliary Information From Survey Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Holt, J.B., Lu, H., Wheaton, A.G., Ford, E.S., Greenlund, K.J., and Croft, J.B. (2014), “Multilevel Regression and Poststratification for Small-Area Estimation of Population Health Outcomes: A Case Study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Prevalence Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 179, 1025–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar