A Bayesian Race Model for Recognition Memory

References

• Audley and Pike (1965), “Some Alternative Stochastic Models of Choice,” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 18, 207–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, W. P. (1970), “Signal Detection Theory and Human Memory,” Psychological Bulletin, 74, 81–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, D. (2007), Aristotle on Memory and Recollection, Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, S. P., and Gelman, A. (1998), “General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colonius, H. (1995), “The Instance Theory of Automaticity: Why the Weibull?” Psychological Review, 102, 744–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craigmile, P. F., Peruggia, M., and Van Zandt, T. (2010a), “Detrending Response Time Series,” in Statistical Methods for Modeling Human Dynamics: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue, eds. S.-M. Chow, E. Ferrer, and F. Hsieh, (Vol. 4), New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Craigmile, P. F., Peruggia, M., and Van Zandt, T. (2010b), “Hierarchical Bayes Models for Response Time Data,” Psychometrika, 75, 613–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craigmile, P. F., Peruggia, M., and Van Zandt, T. (2013), “A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Response Time Data Providing Evidence for Criteria Changes Over Time,” in Current Issues in the Theory and Application of Latent Variable Models, eds. M. C. Edwards, and R. C. MacCallum, New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, S., and Humphreys, M. S. (2001), “A Context Noise Model of Episodic Word Recognition,” Psychological Review, 108, 452–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1913), On Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology, New York: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, J. P. (1958), “Recognition Memory and the Operating Characteristic,” Technical Report AFCRC-TN-58-51, Hearing and Communication Lab, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A., and Tippett, L. H. C. (1928), “Limiting Forms of the Frequency Distribution of the Largest or Smallest Member of a Sample,” in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 24, 180–190.
   Google Scholar
• Geisser, S., and Eddy, W. F. (1979), “A Predictive Approach to Model Selection,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnedenko, B. (1943), “Sur La Distribution Limite du terme Maximum D’une Série Aléatoire,” Annals of Mathematics, 44, 423–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. (1966), Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Friedman, J., and Tibshirani, R. (2009), The Elements of Statistical Learning, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1988), “Judgments of Frequency and Recognition Memory in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model,” Psychological Review, 95, 528–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshman, E. (1995), “Decision Processes in Recognition Memory: Criterion Shifts and the List-Strength Paradigm,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 302–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, S. H. (1967), Theory of Probability (3rd ed.), Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, W. R., Krauss, B. R., Abdul Sabur, N., Colgan, D., Antshel, K. M., Higgins, A. M., and Shprintzen, R. J. (2007), “The Neural Correlates of Non-Spatial Working Memory in Velocardiofacial Syndrome (22q11.2 deletion syndrome),” Neuropsychologia, 45, 2863–2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, S. N. (2013), Resampling Methods for Dependent Data, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1988), “Toward an Instance Theory of Automatization,” Psychological Review, 95, 492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1992), “Shapes of Reaction-Time Distributions and Shapes of Learning Curves: A Test of the Instance Theory of Automaticity,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 883–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D., Van Zandt, T., Verbruggen, F., and Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2014), “On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: General and Special Theories of an Act of Control,” Psychological Review, 121, 66–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock Jr, B. (1962), “The Serial Position Effect of Free Recall,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482–488.
   Google Scholar
• Musen, G., and Treisman, A. (1990), “Implicit and Explicit Memory for Visual Patterns,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 127–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M. (1987), “Attention and Learning Processes in the Identification and Categorization of Integral Stimuli,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13, 87–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., Kruschke, J. K., and McKinley, S. C. (1992), “Combining Exemplar-Based Category Representations and Connectionist Learning Rules,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 211–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosofsky, R. M., and Palmeri, T. J. (1997), “An Exemplar-Based Random Walk Model of Speeded Classification,” Psychological Review, 104, 266–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruggia, M., Van Zandt, T., and Chen, M. (2002), “Was it a Car or a Cat I Saw? An Analysis of Response Times for Word Recognition,” in Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics, (Vol. 6), New York: Springer, pp. 319–334.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, R. (1973), “Response Latency Models for Signal Detection,” Psychological Review, 80, 53–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Province, J. M., and Rouder, J. N. (2012), “Evidence for Discrete-State Processing in Recognition Memory,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 14357–14362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, J. G. W., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1981), “Search of Associative Memory,” Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R. (1978), “A Theory of Memory Retrieval,” Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., and Smith, P. L. (2004), “A Comparison of Sequential Sampling Models for Two-Choice Reaction Time,” Psychological Review, 111, 333–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., and McKoon, G. (1999), “Comparing Connectionist and Diffusion Models of Reaction Time,” Psychological Review, 106, 261–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Province, J. M., Morey, R. D., Gomez, P., and Heathcote, A. (2014), “The Lognormal Race: A Cognitive-Process Model of Choice and Latency With Desirable Psychometric Properties,” Psychometrika, 80, 491–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Sun, D., Speckman, P. L., Lu, J., and Zhou, D. (2003), “A Hierarchical Bayesian Statistical Framework for Response Time Distributions,” Psychometrika, 68, 589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M., and Steyvers, M. (1997), “A Model for Recognition Memory: REM—Retrieving Effectively From Memory,” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 145–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taatgen, N. A., Huss, D., Dickison, D., and Anderson, J. R. (2008), “The Acquisition of Robust and Flexible Cognitive Skills,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 548–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, B. M., Van Zandt, T., and Brown, S. D. (2011), “A Dynamic, Stimulus-Driven Model of Signal Detection,” Psychological Review, 118, 583–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, M., and McClelland, J. L. (2001), “The Time Course of Perceptual Choice: The Leaky, Competing Accumulator Model,” Psychological Review, 108, 550–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zandt, T., Colonius, H., and Proctor, R. W. (2000), “A Comparison of Two Response Time Models Applied to Perceptual Matching,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 208–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, J. L., Schendan, H. E., and Paller, K. A. (2010), “Finding Meaning in Novel Geometric Shapes Influences Electrophysiological Correlates of Repetition and Dissociates Perceptual and Conceptual Priming,” NeuroImage, 49, 2879–2889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. (1994), “Receiver Operating Characteristics in Recognition Memory: Evidence for a Dual-Process Model,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1341–1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar