A Hierarchical Model of Nonhomogeneous Poisson Processes for Twitter Retweets

References

• Antoniades, D., and Dovrolis, C. (2015), “Co-evolutionary Dynamics in Social Networks: A Case Study of Twitter,” Computational Social Networks, 2, 14. DOI: 10.1186/s40649-015-0023-6.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., Rubak, E., and Turner, R. (2015), Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications With R, Interdisciplinary Statistics Series, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, P., Shen, H.-W., Jin, X., and Cheng, X.-Q. (2015), “Modeling and Predicting Popularity Dynamics of Microblogs Using Self-Excited Hawkes Processes,” in Proceedings of the 24th International Converence on World Wide Web, WWW ’15 Companion, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 9–10. DOI: 10.1145/2740908.2742744.
   Google Scholar
• Bar-Lev, S. K., Lavit, I., and Reiser, B. (1992), “Bayesian Inference for the Power Law Process,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 44, 623–639. DOI: 10.1007/BF00053394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L., and Albert, R. (1999), “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks,” Science, 286, 509–512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhamidi, S., Steele, J. M., and Zaman, T. (2015), “Twitter Event Networks and the Superstar Model,” The Annals of Applied Probability, 25, 2462–2502. DOI: 10.1214/14-AAP1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, B. P., and Chib, S. (1995), “Bayesian Model Choice via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 157, 473–484. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02042.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chiodi, M., and Adelfio, G. (2017), “Mixed Non-parametric and Parametric Estimation Techniques in R Package etasFLP for Earthquakes’ Description,” Journal of Statistical Software, 76, 1–29. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v076.i03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressie, N. A. C. (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N., and Wikle, C. K. (2011), Statistics for Spatio-Temporal Data, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, D. J., and Vere-Jones, D. (2003), An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes: Volume I: Elementary Theory and Methods, Probability and Its Applications, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Daley, D. J., and Vere-Jones, D. (2008), An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes: Volume II: General Theory and Structure, Probability and Its Applications, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dellaportas, P., Forster, J. J., and Ntzoufras, I. (2002), “On Bayesian Model and Variable Selection Using MCMC,” Statistics and Computing, 12, 27–36. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013164120801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diggle, P. J. (2013), Statistical Analysis of Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Point Patterns, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Duane, J. T. (1964), “Learning Curve Approach to Reliability Monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace, 2, 563–566. DOI: 10.1109/TA.1964.4319640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farajtabar, M., Wang, Y., Rodriguez, M. G., Li, S., Zha, H., and Song, L. (2015), “Coevolve: A Joint Point Process Model for Information Diffusion and Network Co-evolution,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28, NIPS 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, A. E., Diggle, P. J., Fuentes, M., and Guttorp, P., eds (2010), Handbook of Spatial Statistics, Handbooks of Modern Statistical Methods, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., Meng, X., and Stern, H. (1996), “Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness via Realized Discrepancies,” Statistica Sinica, 6, 733–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götz, M., Leskovec, J., McGlohon, M., and Faloutsos, C. (2009), “Modeling Blog Dynamics,” in ICWSM.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. J. (1995), “Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo Computation and Bayesian Model Determination,” Biometrika, 82, 711–732. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/82.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, L., Doumith, A. S., and Davison, B. D. (2013), “Co-factorization Machines: Modeling User Interests and Predicting Individual Decisions in Twitter,” in Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM ’13, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 557–566. DOI: 10.1145/2433396.2433467.
   Google Scholar
• Illian, J., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H., and Stoyan, D. (2008), Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns, Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Liu, H., Mehta, S., and Subramaniam, L. V. (2014), “From Tweets to Events: Exploring a Scalable Solution for Twitter Streams,” arXiv no. 1405.1392. DOI: 10.1145/2808797.2809389.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Liu, H., Mehta, S., and Subramaniam, L. V. (2015), “Exploring a Scalable Solution to Identifying Events in Noisy Twitter Streams,” in Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015, ASONAM ’15, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 496–499.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Liu, J., Xu, K., and Wen, S. (2012), “Understanding Video Propagation in Online Social Networks,” in Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Quality of Service.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., Li, W., Wang, H., and Zhang, X. (2014), “Modeling of Information Diffusion in Twitter-Like Social Networks Under Information Overload,” The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 914907. DOI: 10.1155/2014/914907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. W., Chen, C., and Buntine, W. (2016), “Twitter-Network Topic Model: A Full Bayesian Treatment for Social Network and Text Modeling,” arXiv no. 1609.06791.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, J., Chen, J., and Nichols, J. (2013), “When Will You Answer This? Estimating Response Time in Twitter,” in Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 697–700.
   Google Scholar
• Masuda, N., and Rocha, L. E. C. (2018), “A Gillespie Algorithm for Non-Markovian Stochastic Processes,” SIAM Review, 60, 95–115. DOI: 10.1137/16M1055876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, P., Mitchell, L., Nguyen, G., and Bean, N. (2017), “The Nature and Origin of Heavy Tails in Retweet Activity,” in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, WWW ’17 Companion, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 1493–1498. DOI: 10.1145/3041021.3053903.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, J., Angheluta, L., Ahlgren, P. T. H., and Jensen, M. H. (2013), “Excitable Human Dynamics Driven by Extrinsic Events in Massive Communities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 17259–17262. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304179110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miotto, J. M., Kantz, H., and Altmann, E. G. (2017), “Stochastic Dynamics and the Predictability of Big Hits in Online Videos,” Physical Review E, 95, 032311.DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller, J., Syversveen, A. R., and Waagepetersen, R. P. (1998), “Log Gaussian Cox Processes,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 25, 451–482. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9469.00115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollgaard, A., and Mathiesen, J. (2015), “Emergent User Behavior on Twitter Modelled by a Stochastic Differential Equation,” PLoS One, 10, 1–12. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishi, R., Takaguchi, T., Oka, K., Maehara, T., Toyoda, M., Kawarabayashi, K., and Masuda, N. (2016), “Reply Trees in Twitter: Data Analysis and Branching Process Models,” Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6, 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s13278-016-0334-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata, Y. (1988), “Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 9–27. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera, R. D. W., Anand, S., Subbalakshmi, K. P., and Chandramouli, R. (2010), “Twitter Analytics: Architecture, Tools and Analysis,” in 2010—MILCOM 2010 Military Communications Conference, pp. 2186–2191. DOI: 10.1109/MILCOM.2010.5680493.
   Google Scholar
• Pozdnoukhov, A., and Kaiser, C. (2011), “Space-Time Dynamics of Topics in Streaming Text,” in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks, LBSN ’11, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1145/2063212.2063223.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, A. (2018), “A Review of Self-Exciting Spatio-Temporal Point Processes and Their Applications,” Statistical Science, 33, 299–318. DOI: 10.1214/17-STS629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaki, T., Okazaki, M., and Matsuo, Y. (2010), “Earthquake Shakes Twitter Users: Real-Time Event Detection by Social Sensors,” in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’10, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 851–860. DOI: 10.1145/1772690.1772777.
   Google Scholar
• Sanli, C., and Lambiotte, R. (2015), “Local Variation of Collective Attention in Hashtag Spike Trains,” in Modeling and Mining Temporal Interactions: Papers From the 2015 ICWSM Workshop, AAAI Press, Palo Alto, California.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H., Wang, D., Song, C., and Barabási, A.-L. (2014), “Modeling and Predicting Popularity Dynamics via Reinforced Poisson Processes,” in Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 291– 297.
   Google Scholar
• Smid, H., Mast, P., Tromp, M., Winterboer, A., and Evers, V. (2011), “Canary in a Coal Mine: Monitoring Air Quality and Detecting Environmental Incidents by Harvesting Twitter,” in CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’11, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1855–1860. DOI: 11245/1.356070.
   Google Scholar
• Srijith, P. K., Lukasik, M., Bontcheva, K., and Cohn, T. (2017), “Longitudinal Modeling of Social Media With Hawkes Process Based on Users and Networks,” in Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3110025.3110107.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, J., Spiro, E. S., Johnson, B., Fitzhugh, S., Gibson, B., and Butts, C. T. (2014), “Warning Tweets: Serial Transmission of Messages During the Warning Phase of a Disaster Event,” Information, Communication & Society, 17, 765–787. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.862561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Guo, J., Zhang, C., and Xie, J. (2011), “Social Media Communication Model Research Bases on Sina-Weibo,” in Knowledge Engineering and Management: Proceedings of the Sixth International Converence on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Enginnering, Shanghai, China, Dec 2011 (ISKE2011), Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 445–454. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-25661-5_57.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, J., Zhang, C., and Wu, M. (2011), “Modeling Microblogging Communication Based on Human Dynamics,” in 2011 Eighth International Converence on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD) (Vol. 4), pp. 2290–2294. DOI: 10.1109/FSKD.2011.6020045.
   Google Scholar
• Yakovlev, G., Rundle, J. B., Shcherbakov, R., and Turcotte, D. L. (2005), “Inter-arrival Time Distribution for the Non-homogeneous Poisson Process,” arXiv no. 0507657.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., Xiong, F., Piao, D., Liu, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2011), “Statistically Modelling the Effectiveness of Disaster Information in Social Media,” in 2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, pp. 431–436. DOI: 10.1109/GHTC.2011.48.
   Google Scholar