Causal Inference With Interference and Noncompliance in Two-Stage Randomized Experiments

References

• Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B. (1996), “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronow, P. M. (2012), “A General Method for Detecting Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments,” Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 3–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112437535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronow, P. M., and Samii, C. (2017), “Estimating Average Causal Effects Under General Interference,” Annals of Applied Statistics, 11, 1912–1947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S., Eckles, D., and Imbens, G. W. (2018), “Exact p-Values for Network Interference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113, 230–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1241178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, S., Bohren, J. A., McIntosh, C., and Özler, B. (2018), “Optimal Design of Experiments in the Presence of Interference,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 100(5), 844–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basse, G., and Feller, A. (2018), “Analyzing Two-Stage Experiments in the Presence of Interference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113, 41–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1323641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. M., and McCaffrey, D. F. (2002), “Bias Reduction in Standard Errors for Linear Regression With Multi-Stage Samples,” Survey Methodology, 28, 169–181.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, P., Ahuja, R., and Bhandari, L. (2010), “The Impoverishing Effect of Healthcare Payments in India: New Methodology and Findings,” Economic and Political Weekly, 45, 65–71.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, A. (2018), “Central Limit Theorems via Stein’s Method for Randomized Experiments Under Interference,” arXiv no. 1804.03105.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1935), The Design of Experiments, London: Oliver and Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Forastiere, L., Airoldi, E. M., and Mealli, F. (2016), “Identification and Estimation of Treatment and Interference Effects in Observational Studies on Networks,” arXiv no. 1609.06245.
   Google Scholar
• Hájek, J. (1960), “Limiting Distributions in Simple Random Sampling From a Finite Population,” Publications of the Mathematical Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 5, 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Halloran, M. E., and Struchiner, C. J. (1995), “Causal Inference in Infectious Diseases,” Epidemiology, 6, 142–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W. (1986), “Statistics and Causal Inference” (with discussion), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, G. (2015), Causality in a Social World: Moderation, Mediation and Spill-Over, Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, G., and Raudenbush, S. W. (2006), “Evaluating Kindergarten Retention Policy: A Case Study of Causal Inference for Multilevel Observational Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 901–910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000000447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudgens, M. G., and Halloran, M. E. (2008), “Toward Causal Inference With Interference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 832–842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., and Jiang, Z. (2018), “Experiment: R Package for Designing and Analyzing Randomized Experiments,” Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN), available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=experiment.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, M. (2003), “Do Informal Risk Sharing Networks Crowd Out Public Voluntary Health Insurance? Evidence From Vietnam,” Applied Economics, 35, 1153–1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684032000079152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., and Imbens, G. (2016), “Peer Encouragement Designs in Causal Inference With Partial Interference and Identification of Local Average Network Effects,” arXiv no. 1609.04464.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. L. (2004), Elements of Large-Sample Theory, Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., and Ding, P. (2017), “General Forms of Finite Population Central Limit Theorems With Applications to Causal Inference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 1759–1769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1295865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W., Liu, Y., and Meng, J. (2014), “The Crowding-Out Effect of Formal Insurance on Informal Risk Sharing: An Experimental Study,” Games and Economic Behavior, 86, 184–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2014.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., and Hudgens, M. G. (2014), “Large Sample Randomization Inference of CAUSAl Effects in the Presence of Interference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109, 288–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2013.844698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyman, J. (1923), “On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments: Essay on Principles, Section 9” (Translated in 1990), Statistical Science, 5, 465–480.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, E. (1989), “Asymptotic Normality for Two-Stage Sampling From a Finite Population,” Probability Theory and Related Fields, 81, 341–352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00340058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R. (2007), “Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102, 191–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1990), “Comments on ‘On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9’ by J. Splawa-Neyman Translated from the Polish and edited by D. M. Dabrowska and T. P. Speed,” Statistical Science, 5, 472–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012032.
   Google Scholar
• Sävje, F., Aronow, P. M., and Hudgens, M. G. (2017), “Average Treatment Effects in the Presence of Unknown Interference,” arXiv no. 1711.06399.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrawat, R., and Rao, K. D. (2011), “Insured Yet Vulnerable: Out-of-Pocket Payments and India’s Poor,” Health Policy and Planning, 27, 213–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czr029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (2006), “What Do Randomized Studies of Housing Mobility Demonstrate? Causal Inference in the Face of Interference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1398–1407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000000636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., and VanderWeele, T. J. (2010), “On Causal Inference in the Presence of Interference,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 21, 55–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280210386779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderweele, T. J., Hong, G., Jones, S. M., and Brown, J. L. (2013), “Mediation and Spillover Effects in Group-Randomized Trials: A Case Study of the 4Rs Educational Intervention,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 108, 469–482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2013.779832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar