Optimal Design of Experiments on Riemannian Manifolds

References

• Alaeddini, A., Craft, E., Meka, R., and Martinez, S. (2019), “Sequential Laplacian Regularized v-optimal Design of Experiments for Response Surface Modeling of Expensive Tests: An Application in Wind Tunnel Testing,” IISE Transactions, 51, 559–576. DOI: 10.1080/24725854.2018.1508928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronszajn, N. (1950), “Theory of Reproducing Kernels,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 68, 337–404. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9947-1950-0051437-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkin, M. (2003), “Problems of Learning on Manifolds,” Ph.D. thesis, The University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, M., and Niyogi, P. (2005), “Towards a Theoretical Foundation for Laplacian-based Manifold Methods,” in Proceedings of Conference on Learning Theory.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, M., Niyogi, P., and Sindhwani, V. (2006), “Manifold Regularization: A Geometric Framework for Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Examples,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7, 2399–2434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G., and Draper, N. (2007), Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, D., and He, X. (2012), “Manifold Adaptive Experimental Design for Text Categorization,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 24, 707–719. DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2011.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Chen, Z., Bu, J., Wang, C., Zhang, L., and Zhang, C. (2010), “G-optimal Design with Laplacian Regularization,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1, 413–418. DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7672.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., and Wu, H. (2013), “Local Linear Regression on Manifolds and its Geometric Interpretation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 108, 1421–1434. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.827984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coifman, R., Lafon, S., Lee, A., Maggioni, M., Nadler, B., Warner, F., and Zuker, S. (2005), “Geometric Diffusions as a Tool for Harmonic Analysis and Structure Definition of Data: Diffusion Maps,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 7426–7431. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500334102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho, D., and Grimes, C. (2003), “Hessian Eigenmaps: Locally Linear Embedding Techniques for High Dimensional Data,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 5591–5596. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1031596100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettinger, B., Sangalli, L. M., and Perotto, S. (2016), “Spatial Regression Models over Two-Dimensional Manifolds,” Biometrika, 103, 71–88. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asv069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K., Li, R., and Sudjianto, A. (2006), Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments. Computer Sicence and Data Analysis Series, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Fedorov, V. V. (1972), Theory of Optimal Experiments. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federov, V. V., and Hackle, P. (1997), Model-Oriented Design of Experiments, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fedorov, V. V., and Leonov, S. (2013a), Optimal Design for Nonlinear Response Models, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fedorov, V. V., and Leonov, S. (2013b), Optimal Design for Nonlinear Response Models, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, A., Abbena, E., and Salamon, S. (2006), Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica, Third Edition (Studies in Advanced Mathematics), Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• He, X. (2010), “Laplacian Regularized d-optimal Design for Active Learning and its Application to Image Retrieval,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 19, 254–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, M., Audibert, J. Y., and von Luxburg, U. (2005), “From Graphs to Manifolds-Weak and Strong Pointwise Consistency of Graph Laplacians,” in Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Learning Theory.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J. (1974), “General Equivalence Theory for Optimum Designs (Approximate Theory),” The Annals of Statistics, 2, 849–879. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176342810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J., and Wolfowitz, J. (1960), “The Equivalence of Two Extremum Problems,” Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 12, 363–366. DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1960-030-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kimeldorf, G. S., and Wahba, G. (1970), “A Correspondence between Bayesian Estimation on Stochastic Processes and Smoothing by Splines,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 495–502. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177697089.
   Google Scholar
• Lafon, S. (2004), “Diffusion Maps and Geometric Harmonics,” Ph. D. thesis, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Del Castillo, E., and Runger, G. (2020), “On Active Learning Methods for Manifold Data,” TEST, 29, 1–33. DOI: 10.1007/s11749-019-00694-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, L., Thomas, B. S., Zhu, H., and Dunson, D. B. (2017), “Extrinsic Local Regression on Manifold-Valued Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 1261–1273. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1208615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzio, M. D., Panzera, A., and Taylor, C. C. (2014), “Nonparametric Regression for Spherical Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 109, 748–763. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2013.866567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronzato, L., and Pazman, A. (2013), Design of Experiments in Nonlinear Models: Asymtpotic Normality, Optimality Criteria and Small-sample Properties, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pukelsheim, F. (2006), Optimal Design of Experiments, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Roweis, S. T., and Saul, L. K. (2000), “Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding,” Science, 290, 2323–2326. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, J. B., de Silva, V., and Langford, J. C. (2000), “A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction,” Science, 290, 2319–2323. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuchkov, I. (1977), “A Ridge-Type Procedure for Design of Experiments,” Biometrika, 64, 147–150. DOI: 10.2307/2335787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahba, G. (1990), Spline Models for Observational Data, Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-F. J., and Hamada, M. S. (2009), Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization, (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, H. P. (1970), “The Sequential Generation of d-optimum Experimental Designs,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41, 1655–1664. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177696809.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, Z., and Zhang, Z. (2020), “Principal Boundary on Riemannian Manifolds,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 115, 1435–1448. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2019.1610660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, K., Zhu, S., Xu, W., and Gong, Y. (2008), “Non-greedy Active Learning for Text Categorization using Convex Transductive Experimental Design,” in Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, Singapore, pp. 635–642.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, B., Liu, J. Z., Cauley, S. F., Rosen, B. R., and Rosen, M. S. (2018), “Image Reconstruction by Domain-Transform Manifold Learning,” Nature, 555, 487–492. DOI: 10.1038/nature25988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar