Anytime-Valid Tests of Conditional Independence Under Model-X

References

• Azadkia, M., Chatterjee, S. (2021), “A Simple Measure of Conditional Dependence,” The Annals of Statistics, 49, 3070–3102. DOI: 10.1214/21-AOS2073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, A. (1998), “Information-Theoretic Characterization of Bayes Performance and the Choice of Priors in Parametric and Nonparametric Problems,” in Bayesian Statistics (Vol. 6), eds. Bernardo, J. M., Berger, J. O., Dawid, A. P., Smith, A. F. M., pp. 27–52, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berrett, T. B., Wang, Y., Barber, R. F., and Samworth, R. J. (2020), “The Conditional Permutation Test for Independence While Controlling for Confounders,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 82, 175–197. DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12340.
   Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, B., Foster, D. J., and Roy, D. M. (2021), “Minimax Rates for Conditional Density Estimation via Empirical Entropy,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.10461.
   Google Scholar
• Candès, E., Fan, Y., Janson, L., and Lv, J. (2018), “Panning for Gold: ‘Model-X’ Knockoffs for High Dimensional Controlled Variable Selection,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 80, 551–577. DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12265.
   Google Scholar
• Casper, C., Cook, T., and on FORTRAN program ld98., O. A. P. B. (2022), ldbounds: Lan-DeMets Method for Group Sequential Boundaries, R package version 2.0.0.
   Google Scholar
• Cover, T. M., and Thomas, J. A. (1991), Elements of Information Theory, Wiley Series in Telecommunications, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, D., and Robbins, H. (1967), “Confidence Sequences for Mean, Variance, and Median,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 58, 66–68. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.58.1.66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawid, A. P. (1979), “Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 41, 1–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1979.tb01052.x.
   Google Scholar
• Duan, B., Ramdas, A., and Wasserman, L. (2022), “Interactive Rank Testing by Betting,” in Proceedings of the First Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning, Vol. 177 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 201–235.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, D. J., Kale, S., Luo, H., Mohri, M., and Sridharan, K. (2018), “Logistic Regression: The Importance of Being Improper,” in Proceedings COLT, pp. 167–208.
   Google Scholar
• Fukumizu, K., Gretton, A., Sun, X., and Schölkopf, B. (2007), “Kernel Measures of Conditional Dependence,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 20).
   Google Scholar
• Grünwald, P. (2022), “Beyond Neyman-Pearson,” arXiv preprint arXiv: 2205.00901.
   Google Scholar
• Grünwald, P. D., and Mehta, N. A. (2020), “Fast Rates for General Unbounded Loss Functions,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21, 1–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünwald, P., de Heide, R., and Koolen, W. (2019), “Safe Testing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.07801.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, D. W., Imai, K., and Janson, L. (2022), “Using Machine Learning to Test Causal Hypotheses in Conjoint Analysis,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08343.
   Google Scholar
• Katsevich, E., and Ramdas, A. (2022), “On the Power of Conditional Independence Testing Under Model-X,” Electronic Journal of Statistics, 16, 6348–6394. DOI: 10.1214/22-EJS2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koolen, W. M., and Grünwald, P. (2022), “Log-Optimal Anytime-Valid E-Values,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 141, 69–82. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2021.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., and Liu, M. (2022), “Maxway CRT: Improving the Robustness of Model-X Inference,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.06496.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Katsevich, E., Janson, L., and Ramdas, A. (2021), “Fast and Powerful Conditional Randomization Testing via Distillation,” Biometrika, 109, 277–293. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asab039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. (1989), Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.), CRC Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability Series, New York: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Niu, Z., Chakraborty, A., Dukes, O., Katsevich, E., (2022), “Reconciling Model-X and Doubly Robust Approaches to Conditional Independence Testing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.14698.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P. C., and Fleming, T. R. (1979), “A Multiple Testing Procedure for Clinical Trials,” Biometrics, 35, 549–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, S. J. (1977), “Group Sequential Methods in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials,” Biometrika, 64, 191–199. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/64.2.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, S. J., and Simon, R. (1975), “Sequential Treatment Assignment with Balancing for Prognostic Factors in the Controlled Clinical Trial,” Biometrics, 31, 103–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, G., and Field, C. (2002), “Law of Iterated Logarithm and Consistent Model Selection Criterion in Logistic Regression,” Statistics & Probability Letters, 56, 101–112. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7152(01)00191-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2022), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Ramdas, A., Ruf, J., Larsson, M., and Koolen, W. (2020), “Admissible Anytime-Valid Sequential Inference Must Rely on Nonnegative Martingales,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03167.
   Google Scholar
• Ramdas, A., Ruf, J., Larsson, M., and Koolen, W. M. (2022), “Testing Exchangeability: Fork-Convexity, Supermartingales and E-Processes,” International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 141, 83–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2021.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, H. (1952), “Some Aspects of the Sequential Design of Experiments,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 58, 527–535. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1952-09620-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runge, J. (2018), “Conditional Independence Testing Based on a Nearest-Neighbor Estimator of Conditional Mutual Information,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (Vol. 84) of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 938–947.
   Google Scholar
• Shaer, S., Maman, G., and Romano, Y. (2022), “Model-Free Sequential Testing for Conditional Independence via Testing by Betting,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.00354.
   Google Scholar
• Shafer, G. (2021), “Testing by Betting: A Strategy for Statistical and Scientific Communication,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 184, 407–431. DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, R. D., and Peters, J. (2020), “The Hardness of Conditional Independence Testing and the Generalized Covariance Measure,” The Annals of Statistics, 48, 1514–1538. DOI: 10.1214/19-AOS1857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, N., Friedman, J., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (2011), “Regularization Paths for Cox’s Proportional Hazards Model via Coordinate Descent,” Journal of Statistical Software, 39, 1–13. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v039.i05.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Schure, J., Perez-Ortiz, M. F., Ly, A., and Grunwald, P. (2020), “The Safe Logrank Test: Error Control under Continuous Monitoring with Unlimited Horizon,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.06931.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R., Ly, A., and Grünwald, P. (2021), “Generic E-Variables for Exact Sequential k-Sample Tests That Allow for Optional Stopping,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.02693.
   Google Scholar
• Vovk, V., and Wang, R. (2021), “E-values: Calibration, Combination and Applications,” The Annals of Statistics, 49, 1736–1754. DOI: 10.1214/20-AOS2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald, A. (1947), Sequential Analysis, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, L., Ramdas, A., and Balakrishnan, S. (2020), “Universal Inference,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 16880–16890. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1922664117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, W. H., and Shen, X. S. (1995), “Probability Inequalities for Likelihood Ratios and Convergence Rates of Sieve MLES,” The Annals of Statistics, 23, 339–362. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176324524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.-X., Hu, F., Cheung, S. H., and Chan, W. S. (2007), “Asymptotic Properties of Covariate-Adjusted Response-Adaptive Designs,” The Annals of Statistics, 35, 1166–1182. DOI: 10.1214/009053606000001424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar