1,151
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Theory and Methods

Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes and Partial Welfare Ordering

ORCID Icon
Received 14 Jul 2021, Accepted 11 Jul 2023, Published online: 06 Sep 2023

References

  • Abadie, A., Angrist, J., and Imbens, G. (2002), “Instrumental Variables Estimates of the Effect of Subsidized Training on the Quantiles of Trainee Earnings,” Econometrica, 70, 91–117. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00270.
  • Almond, D., and Mazumder, B. (2013), “Fetal Origins and Parental Responses,” Annual Review of Economics, 5, 37–56. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-082912-110145.
  • Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Rubin, D. B. (1996), “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables,” Journal of the American statistical Association, 91, 444–455. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902.
  • Ashenfelter, O., and Card, D. (2010), Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Athey, S., and Imbens, G. W. (2019), “Machine Learning Methods that Economists Should Know About,” Annual Review of Economics, 11, 685–725. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433.
  • Athey, S., and Imbens, G. W. (2022), “Design-based Analysis in Difference-in-Differences Settings with Staggered Adoption,” Journal of Econometrics, 226, 62–79.
  • Athey, S., and Wager, S. (2021), “Policy Learning with Observational Data,” Econometrica, 89, 133–161. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA15732.
  • Backlund, E., Sorlie, P. D., and Johnson, N. J. (1996), “The Shape of the Relationship between Income and Mortality in the United States: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study,” Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 12–20. DOI: 10.1016/1047-2797(95)00090-9.
  • Balke, A., and Pearl, J. (1997), “Bounds on Treatment Effects from Studies with Imperfect Compliance,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 1171–1176. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1997.10474074.
  • Bhattacharya, D., and Dupas, P. (2012), “Inferring Welfare Maximizing Treatment Assignment Under Budget Constraints,” Journal of Econometrics, 167, 168–196. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.11.007.
  • Bloom, H. S., Orr, L. L., Bell, S. H., Cave, G., Doolittle, F., Lin, W., and Bos, J. M. (1997), “The Benefits and Costs of JTPA Title II-A Programs: Key Findings from the National Job Training Partnership Act study,” Journal of Human Resources, 32, 549–576. DOI: 10.2307/146183.
  • Callaway, B., and Sant’Anna, P. H. (2021), “Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods,” Journal of Econometrics, 225, 200–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001.
  • Case, A., Lubotsky, D., and Paxson, C. (2002), “Economic Status and Health in Childhood: The Origins of the Gradient,” American Economic Review, 92, 1308–1334. DOI: 10.1257/000282802762024520.
  • Cellini, S. R., Ferreira, F., and Rothstein, J. (2010), “The Value of School Facility Investments: Evidence from a Dynamic Regression Discontinuity Design,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 215–261. DOI: 10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.215.
  • Chao, Y.-C., Tran, Q., Tsodikov, A., and Kidwell, K. M. (2022), “Joint Modeling and Multiple Comparisons with the Best of Data from a SMART with Survival Outcomes,” Biostatistics, 23, 294–313. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa025.
  • Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1992), “A Developmental and Clinical Model for the Prevention of Conduct Disorder: The FAST Track Program,” Development and Psychopathology, 4, 509–527.
  • Cui, Y., and Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. (2021), “A Semiparametric Instrumental Variable Approach to Optimal Treatment Regimes under Endogeneity,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116, 162–173. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1783272.
  • Cunha, F., and Heckman, J. (2007), “The Technology of Skill Formation,” American Economic Review, 97, 31–47. DOI: 10.1257/aer.97.2.31.
  • de Chaisemartin, C., and d’Haultfoeuille, X. (2020), “Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects,” American Economic Review, 110, 2964–2996. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20181169.
  • Ertefaie, A., Wu, T., Lynch, K. G., and Nahum-Shani, I. (2016), “Identifying a Set that Contains the Best Dynamic Treatment Regimes,” Biostatistics, 17, 135–148. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv025.
  • Han, S. (2021a), “Comment: Individualized Treatment Rules under Endogeneity,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116, 192–195. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1831923.
  • Han, S. (2021b), “Identification in Nonparametric Models for Dynamic Treatment Effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 225, 132–147.
  • Han, S., and Yang, S. (2023), “A Computational Approach to Identification of Treatment Effects for Policy Evaluation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.13861.
  • Heckman, J. J., Humphries, J. E., and Veramendi, G. (2016), “Dynamic Treatment Effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 191, 276–292. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.12.001.
  • Heckman, J. J., and Navarro, S. (2007), “Dynamic Discrete Choice and Dynamic Treatment Effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 136, 341–396. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.11.002.
  • Hirano, K., and Porter, J. R. (2009), “Asymptotics for Statistical Treatment Rules,” Econometrica, 77, 1683–1701.
  • Imbens, G. W., and Angrist, J. D. (1994), “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects,” Econometrica, 62, 467–475. DOI: 10.2307/2951620.
  • Johnson, R. C., and Jackson, C. K. (2019), “Reducing Inequality through Dynamic Complementarity: Evidence from Head Start and Public School Spending,” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11, 310–349. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20180510.
  • Kamat, V. (2019), “Identification with Latent Choice Sets: The Case of the Head Start Impact Study,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.02048.
  • Kasy, M. (2016), “Partial Identification, Distributional Preferences, and the Welfare Ranking of Policies,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 98, 111–131. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00528.
  • Kasy, M., and Sautmann, A. (2021), “Adaptive Treatment Assignment in Experiments for Policy Choice,” Econometrica, 89, 113–132. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA17527.
  • Kitagawa, T., and Tetenov, A. (2018), “Who Should Be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice,” Econometrica, 86, 591–616. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA13288.
  • Kock, A. B., Preinerstorfer, D., and Veliyev, B. (2021), “Functional Sequential Treatment Allocation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 117, 1311–1323. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1851236.
  • Kramer, M. S., Chalmers, B., Hodnett, E. D., Sevkovskaya, Z., Dzikovich, I., Shapiro, S., Collet, J.-P., Vanilovich, I., Mezen, I., Ducruet, T., et al. (2001), “Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT): A Randomized Trial in the Republic of Belarus,” Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 413–420. DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.4.413.
  • Machado, C., Shaikh, A., and Vytlacil, E. (2019), “Instrumental Variables and the Sign of the Average Treatment Effect,” Journal of Econometrics, 212, 522–555. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.04.007.
  • Manski, C. F. (2004), “Statistical Treatment Rules for Heterogeneous Populations,” Econometrica, 72, 1221–1246. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00530.x.
  • Manski, C. F. (2007): “Partial Identification of Counterfactual Choice Probabilities,” International Economic Review, 48, 1393–1410.
  • McDonough, P., Duncan, G. J., Williams, D., and House, J. (1997), “Income Dynamics and Adult Mortality in the United States, 1972 through 1989,” American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1476–1483. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.9.1476.
  • Mogstad, M., Santos, A., and Torgovitsky, A. (2018), “Using Instrumental Variables for Inference about Policy Relevant Treatment Parameters,” Econometrica, 86, 1589–1619. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA15463.
  • Murphy, S. A. (2003), “Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 65, 331–355. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00389.
  • Murphy, S. A., van der Laan, M. J., Robins, J. M., and C. P. P. R. Group. (2001), “Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1410–1423. DOI: 10.1198/016214501753382327.
  • Neal, D. (1997), “The Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling on Educational Achievement,” Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 98–123. DOI: 10.1086/209848.
  • Qiu, H., Carone, M., Sadikova, E., Petukhova, M., Kessler, R. C., and Luedtke, A. (2021), “Optimal Individualized Decision Rules Using Instrumental Variable Methods,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116, 174–191. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1745814.
  • Robins, J. M. (2004), “Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions,” in Proceedings of the Second Seattle Symposium in Biostatistics, Springer, pp. 189–326.
  • Stoye, J. (2012), “Minimax Regret Treatment Choice with Covariates or with Limited Validity of Experiments,” Journal of Econometrics, 166, 138–156. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.06.012.
  • Sun, L., and Abraham, S. (2021), “Estimating Dynamic Treatment Effects in Event Studies with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects,” Journal of Econometrics, 225, 175–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006.
  • The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Cooperative Research Group. (1988), “Rationale and Design of a Randomized Clinical Trial on Prevention of Stroke in Isolated Systolic Hypertension,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 41, 1197–1208.
  • Torgovitsky, A. (2019), “Nonparametric Inference on State Dependence in Unemployment,” Econometrica, 87, 1475–1505. DOI: 10.3982/ECTA14138.
  • Vytlacil, E. (2002), “Independence, Monotonicity, and Latent Index Models: An Equivalence Result,” Econometrica, 70, 331–341. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00277.
  • Zhang, Y., Laber, E. B., Tsiatis, A., and Davidian, M. (2015), “Using Decision Lists to Construct Interpretable and Parsimonious Treatment Regimes,” Biometrics, 71, 895–904. DOI: 10.1111/biom.12354.