Practices and Politics of Rural Living in Latvia: An Interdisciplinary View

References

• Barry, A., G. Born, and W. Gisa. 2008. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, H. 2008. “The Lively Process of Interdisciplinarity.” Area 41 (4): 395–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimdiņa, A. and I. Raubiško, eds. 2012a. Dzīve, attīstība, labbūtība Latvijas laukos [Life, Development and Well-Being in the Latvian Countryside], 7–32. Rīga: Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• Cimdiņa, A. and I. Raubiško, eds. 2012b. Cilvēks un darbs Latvijas laukos: sociālantropoloģisks skatījums [Person and Work in the Latvian Countryside: A Social Anthropological Perspective]. Rīga: Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, H. P. 2010. “Imagined Lives and Modernist Chronotopes in Mexican Nonmigrant Discourse.” American Ethnologist 37 (2): 275–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzenovska, D. 2012. Aizbraukšana un Tukšums Latvijas laukos: Starp Zudušām un Iespējamām Nākotnēm [Departure and Emptiness in the Latvian Countryside: Between Lost and Possible Futures]. Rīga: Turība.
   Google Scholar
• Dzenovska, D. n.d. “Losing Racial Innocence: Politics of Tolerance in Postsocialist Europe”. Manuscript in preparation. 
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1994. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. 2000. “The Common Agricultural Policy and the Reinvention of the Rural in the European Community.” Sociologia Ruralis 40 (1): 30–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfacree, K. H. 1993. “Locality and Social Representation: Space, Discourse, and Alternative Definitions of the Rural.” Journal of Rural Studies 9 (1): 23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanovs, D. 2012. Latvijas reģionu mazo pašvaldību stratēģijas dažādības vadībā. Sabiedriskās politikas analīze un rekomendācijas situācijas maiņai. Rīga: Biznesa Augstkola Turība.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, F. 2000. “Toward an Empire of Nations: Border-Making and the Formation of Soviet National Identities.” Russian Review 59 (2): 201–226.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, F. 2005. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of Soviet Union. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggart, K. 1990. “Let’s Do Away with the Rural.” Journal of Rural Studies 6 (3): 245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kārkliņa, R. 2011. “Starpdisciplinārs Skats uz Latvijas Lauku Vidi” [Cross-Disciplinary View of the Latvian Countryside]. Akadēmiskā Dzīve [Academic Life] 48: 82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Latvijas lauku attīstības programma, 2007–2003 [Latvia Rural Development Program, 2007–2013]. Riga: Latvijas Republikas Zemkopības ministrija. Accessed June 2012. http://www.zm.gov.lv/doc_upl/LAP_10_versija.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1852. The 18th Brumaire  of Louis Bonaparte. Accessed June 2012. http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1852/18th-brumaire/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Miller, T. R., T. D. Baird, C. M. Littlefield, G. Kofinas, S. F. Chapin III, and C. L. Redman. 2008. “Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research.” Ecology and Society 13 (2): 46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mincyte, D. 2011. “Subsistence and Sustainability in Post-Industrial Europe: The Politics of Small-Scale Farming in Europeanising Lithuania.” Sociologia Ruralis 51 (2): 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissani, M. 1997. “Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity: The Case for Interdisciplinary Knowledge and Research.” The Social Science Journal 34 (2): 201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortner, S. 1984. “Theory in Anthropology Since the Sixties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1): 126–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oughton, E., and L. Bracken. 2009. “Interdisciplinary Research: Framing and Reframing.” Area 41 (4): 385–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, A. C. 1996. “Discourses of Rurality: Loose Talk or Social Struggle?.” Journal of Rural Studies 12 (1): 69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priedīte, A. 2012a. Zaļās zemes dievsunīšu un likteņu līdumnieku laiki. Literatūrsocioloģisks pētījums. Pirmā daļa [The Age of Green Earth, God’s Dogs, and The × of Fate. Part One]. Rīga: Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• Priedīte, A. 2012b. Staburi: Kādas viensētas stāsts [Staburi: A Story of a Single Farmstead]. Rīga: Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• Slezkine, Y. 1994. Arctic Mirrors: Russia and the Small Peoples of the North. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 2005. “Anthropology and Interdisciplinarity.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 4 (2): 125–135.
   Google Scholar
• Tisenkopfs, T. 1999. “Rurality as a Created Field: Towards an Integrated Rural Development in Latvia?.” Sociologia Ruralis 39 (3): 411–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisenkopfs, T. 2010. “Ne lauki, bet īsts purvs. Melnais piens: socioloģisks skatījums uz Jaunā Rīgas teātra izrādi” [Not Countryside, But a Swamp: A Sociological Review of the Play of New Riga Theatre]. Ir. Accessed May 6, 2010. http://www.ir.lv/2010/5/6/nelauki-bet-iists-purvs.
   Google Scholar
• Trumpa, E. 2012. Latviešu ģeolingvistikas etīdes [Essays of Latvian Geolinguistics]. Rīga: Apgāds Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. 1976. Peasants Into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. 1973. The Country and the City. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, T. 2010. “Imagined Noncommunities: National Indifference as an Analytical Category.” Slavic Review 69 (1): 93–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar