Informal and Formal Civil Society: Latvia’s Countryside

References

• As Cits Medijs: ir.lv. Oligarhu kapusvētki pulcē ap 8000 iedzīvotāju [Cemetary Festival of Oligarchs Mobilizes Around 8000 Residents]. 8 June 2011. Accessed June 15, 2012. http://www.ir.lv/2011/6/8/oligarhu-kapusvetki-pulce-ap-pieciem-tukstosiem-iedzivotaju
   Google Scholar
• BISS. 2011. Pārskats par NVO sektoru Latvijā [Overview of the NGO Sector in Latvia]. Riga: Baltic Institute of Social Sciences. Accessed April 15, 2012. http://lsif.lv/files/pics/Atbalstitie_projekti/Eez_Norv_fin_instr/Biss-Nvo_sektors_Biss_27_04_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beissinger, M. R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cimdiņa, A. and I. Raubiško, eds. 2012. Dzīve – Attīstība – Labbūtība Latvijas laukos. Starpdisciplinārs rakstu krājums [Life – Development – Well-Being in the Latvian Countryside: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Articles]. Rīga: Apgāds Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• Dzenovska, D. 2011. “‘Dānis’ Latvijas laukos: mīti un pēcpadomju agrārā kapitālisma kritika” [‘The Dane’ in the Latvian Countryside: Myths and Critique of Post-Soviet Agrarian Capitalism]. Akadēmiskā Dzīve 48: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Finifter, A. W., ed. 1993. Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gaugere, K., and I. Austers. 2005. Nevalstiskās organizācijas Latvijā: sabiedrības zināšanas, attieksme un iesaistīšanās [Nongovernmental Organizations in Latvia: The Knowledge, Attitude, and Involvements of Society]. Rīga: Sorosa Fonds – Latvija. Accessed April 15, 2012. http://politika.lv/article/nevalstiskas-organizacijas-latvija-sabiedribas-zinasanas-attieksme-un-iesaistisanas
   Google Scholar
• Graudiņš, U. 2012. “Smaka kavē ražošanas izaugsmi” [The Smell Hinders Production Growth]. Latvijas Avīze, 20 February.
   Google Scholar
• Greckhamer, T., M. Koro-Ljungberg, S. Cilesiz, and S. Hayes. 2008. “Demystifying Interdisciplinary Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 14 (2): 307–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 2010. “‘There’s Nothing Anyone Can Do About It’: Participation, Apathy, and ‘Successful’ Democratic Transition in Postsocialist Serbia.” Slavic Review 69 (1): 41–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grišāne, A. 2011. “Dunikas vēju sāga” [The Tale of Dunika Winds]. Politika.Lv, 3 March 2011. Accessed April 15, 2012. http://www.politika.lv/temas/tiesiska_valsts_un_korupcija/18959/.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, C. 2005. “Introduction: Political Society and Civil Anthropology..” In Civil Society Challenging Western Models, edited by C. Hann and E. Dunn, 1–27. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanovs, D. 2012. Latvijas reģionu mazo pašvaldību stratēģijas dažādības vadībā [Strategies of Diversity Management of Small Regional Governments in Latvia]. Rīga: Turība.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, M. M. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ījabs, I. 2005. “The Same Civil Society? Moral Identity and Perception of Politics Before and After 1991.” Scientific Papers. University of Latvia: Political Science. Changing, Overlapping and Interacting Identities 680: 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Ījabs, I. 2007. “Pilsoniskās sabiedrības diskurss modernajā politikas teorijā un tā elementi Latvijas politisko ideju vēsturē (Miķelis Valters un Pauls Šīmanis)” [Civil Society Discourse in Modern Political Theory and Its Elements in the History of Political Ideas in Latvia (Miķelis Valters and Pauls Šīmanis)]. Unpublished PhD diss., University of Latvia, Rīga.
   Google Scholar
• Karklins, R. 1994. Ethnopolitics and Transition to Democracy: The Collapse of the USSR and Latvia. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karklins, R., and B. Zepa. 2001. “Political Participation in Latvia 1987–2001.” Journal of Baltic Studies 32 (4): 334–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krek, J., B. Losito, R. Ridley, and B. Hoskins. 2012. “Good Practices Report: Participatory Citizenship in the European Union.” Accessed June 20, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/pdf/report_3_good_practice.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kārkliņa, R. 2011. “Starpdisciplinārs skats uz Latvijas lauku vidi” [An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Latvian Countryside]. Akadēmiskā Dzīve 48 (2011/2012): 82–90. 
   Google Scholar
• Kārkliņa, R.2012a. “Lauku kopienu, pašvaldību un valsts iestāžu sadarbība attīstības plānošanā” [Cooperation Between Rural Communities, Local Governments and State Institutions in Development Planning]. In Dzīve – Attīstība – Labbūtība Latvijas laukos. Starpdisciplinārs Rakstu Krājums [Life – Development – Well-Being in the Latvian Countryside], edited by A. Cimdiņa and I. Raubiško, 67–87. Rīga: Apgāds Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• Kārkliņa, R.2012b. “Vai laukos ir pilsoniskā sabiedrība?” [Is There Civil Society in the Countryside?]. In Identitātes. Kopienas. Diskursi [Identities, Communities, Discourses], edited by B. Bela, 47–60. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais Apgāds.
   Google Scholar
• Latvijas Zemes Draugi. Ko mēs darām? [Latvian Friends of Earth: What Are We Doing?]. Accessed April 15, 2012. http://www.zemesdraugi.lv/lv/ko-mes-daram/gmo
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and D. Marsh. 2008. “New Forms of Political Participation: Searching for Expert Citizens and Everyday Makers.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 247–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, T. 2008. “Explaining Civil Society Core Activism in Post-Soviet Latvia.” Unpublished PhD diss., Stockholm University, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J., and A. Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misiņa, I. 2012. “LEADER atbalsts uzpurina ikdienu” [LEADER Support Reinvigorates the Everyday]. Latvijas Avīze, 6 August.
   Google Scholar
• Mžavanadze, N. 2009. “Sustainable Development in Lithuania: Between the Government Agenda and the Undiscovered Civil Society.” Journal of Baltic Studies 40 (3): 397–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P., ed. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozoliņa, L. 2010. “Raspberries, Tablecloths, and Critical Thinking: Accountability Reforms in Post-Socialist Latvia.” East European Politics and Societies 24 (4): 572–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paula, L., and A. Zobena. 2007. “Partnerība – inovatīvs diskurss Latvijas lauku attīstībā” [Partnership – an Innovative Discourse in Rural Development in Latvia]. Latvijas Universitātes Raksti: Socioloģija 714: 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Pauliņš, J. 2011. “Aicinu darboties Piebalgas latviešu biedrībā!” [Participate in the Piebalga Latvian Association!].” Avīze Piebaldzēniem 1 (155): 6.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, T., and S. Tarrow. 2007. “Transactional and Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Polity: The Puzzle of East – Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 74–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pētersons, J. 2010. “Kultūras Panorāma Aprīlis–Maijs: 3. maijs – Jaunpiebalgas novada sakopšanas talka ‘Ceļš uz mājām’” [Cultural Panorama April – May: May 3–Jaunpiebalga District Worker Bee ‘Road to Home’]. Avīze Piebaldzēniem 4 (146): 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rūtenberga–Bērziņa, I. 2010. “Bez cūkām un mēsliem neiztikt” [Cannot Do Without Pigs and Manure]. Latvijas Avīze, 17 March.
   Google Scholar
• Sedlenieks, K.2012. “Dzīve valsts kabatās: Apzināta atteikšanās no sadarbības ar valsti kā izdzīvošanas (attīstības) stratēģija Latvijas laukos” [Life in the Pockets of the State: Conscious Refusal of Cooperation with the State as a Survival (Development) Strategy in the Latvian Countryside]. In Dzīve – Attīstība – Labbūtība Latvijas laukos. Starpdisciplinārs rakstu krājums [Life – Development – Well-Being in the Latvian Countryside], edited by A. Cimdiņa and I. Raubiško, 88–117. Rīga: Apgāds Zinātne.
   Google Scholar
• The Latvian Law Website. Biedrību un nodibinājumu likums, 1 January 2012. Accessed October 29, 2012. http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=81050
   Google Scholar
• The World Values Survey Association. World Value Survey 2010–2012, 2011. Accessed April 15, 2012. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs/articles/folder_published/article_base_136/files/WVS_2010-2012_REVISED_OCT_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tisenkopfs, T., and S. Sumane2004. “Rural Community Initiatives in the Latvian Countryside..” In Mapping Rural Problematics in the Baltic, edited by I. Alanen, 219–247. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tomsone, I. 2010. “Mācība ar cenu kūleņiem izturēta” [Lesson with Price Tumbles Withstood]. Latvijas Avīze, 3 March.
   Google Scholar
• Upena, G. 2010. “Zosēnu kooperatīvajai krājaizdevu sabiedrībai – 10” [Zosēnu Cooperative Credit Union – 10]. Avīze Piebaldzēniem 1 (143): 8.
   Google Scholar
• Vaivare, B., and I. Meiere. 2007. Latviešu cimdi – 2006: Kā latvieši NATO cimdus adīja [Latvian Gloves: How Latvians Made Gloves for NATO]. Rīga: Ulma.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, T. W. G., M. Grotenhuis, and P. L. H. Scheepers. 2009. “Three Types of Voluntary Associations in Comparative Perspective: The Importance of Studying Associational Involvement Through a Typology of Associations in 21 European Countries.” Journal of Civil Society 5 (3): 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar