Between improvisation and inevitability: former Latvian officials’ memoirs of the Soviet era

References

• Aarelaid-Tart, A. 2003. “Estonian-inclined Communists as Mariginals.” In Biographical Research in Eastern Europe: Altered Lives and Broken Biographies, edited by R. Miller, and E. Zdravomyslova, 71–99. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Aarelaid-Tart, A. 2010. “The Theory of Cultural Trauma as Applied to the Investigation of the Mindset of Estonians under Soviet Rule (Based on the Biographical Method).” In Inheriting the 1990s: The Baltic Countries, Studia Uralica Upsaliensia, edited by M.-K. Baiba, Vol. 37, 38–64. Uppsala: Edita Västra Aros.
   Google Scholar
• Āboltiņš, J. 1992. Biju biedrs, tagad kungs. Rīga: Neatkarīgā Cīņa.
   Google Scholar
• Andrle, V. 2000. “Neither a Dinosaur nor a Weathercock: The Construction of a Reputably Continuous Self in Czech Post-communist Life Stories.” Qualitative Sociology 23 (2): 215–230. doi:10.1023/A:1005434900668.
   Google Scholar
• Andrle, V. 2001. “The Buoyant Class: Bourgeois Family Lineage in the Life Stories of Czech Business Elite Persons.” Sociology 35 (4): 815–833. doi:10.1177/S003803850100815X.
   Google Scholar
• Anepaio, T. 2002. “Reception of the Topic of Repressions in the Estonian Society.” Pro Ethnologia 13: 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Artmane, V. 2004. Ziemcieši. Mirkļi no manas dzīves. Rīga: Pētergailis.
   Google Scholar
• Assmann, A. 2004. “Four Formats of Memory: From Individual to Collective Constructions of the Past.” In Cultural Memory and Historical Consciousness in the German-Speaking World Since 1500, edited by C. Emden, and D. Midgley, 19–37. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Augustine. 1991. Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2003. The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bela, B. 2012. “Everyday Life, Power, and Agency in Turbulent Latvia: The Story of Otto Irbe.” In Baltic Biographies in Historical Crossroads, edited by A. Aardelaid-Tart, and L. Bennich-Björkman, 37–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bela-Krūmiņa, B. 2003. “Relationship between Personal and Social: Strategies of Everyday Life in the Process of Radical Social Changes.” Pro Ethnologia 16: 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Beļavnieks, J. 2011. …bet tā bija. Rīga: Trīsdesmit seši.
   Google Scholar
• Berklavs, E. 1998. Zināt un neaizmirst. Rīga: Preses nams.
   Google Scholar
• Blonskis, A. V. 2000. No ierindnieka līdz ģenerālim. Rīga: Likuma Vārdā.
   Google Scholar
• Boym, S. 2001. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, R. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budryte, D. 2002. “‘We Call It Genocide’: Soviet Deportations and Repression in the Memory of Lithuanians.” Bridges 9 (3/4): 223–253.
   Google Scholar
• Budryte, D. 2005. Taming Nationalism? Political Community Building in the Post-Soviet Baltic States. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Čaklais, M. 1992. “Epitāfija reformkomunismam.” Laiks, November 11.
   Google Scholar
• Dzenītis, J. 2002. Sava laikmeta vilnī. Rīga: J. Dzenītis.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., and J. Linde. 2005. “Communist Nostalgia and the Consolidation of Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 21 (3): 354–374. doi:10.1080/13523270500183512.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. 2008. “Social Representations, Alternative Representations and Semantic Barriers.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (4): 375–391. doi:10.1111/jtsb.2008.38.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1986. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simo & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, C. 2006. “A Social Representation Is Not a Quiet Thing: Exploring the Critical Potential of Social Representations Theory.” British Journal of Social Psychology 45: 65–86. doi:10.1348/014466605X43777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanauskas, V. 2012. Lietuviškoji nomeklatūra biurokratinėje sistemoje: Tarp stagnacijos ir dinamikos (1968–1988 m.). Vilnius: Lietuvos istorijos institutas.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers, K. 2000. The Question of German Guilt. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jõesalu, K. 2005. “’The Right to Happiness’. Echoes of Soviet Ideology in Biographical Narratives.” Berliner Osteuropa Info 23: 91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Jõesalu, K., and E. Kõresaar. 2012. “Working through Mature Socialism: Private and Public in the Life Story of an Estonian Industry Manager.” In Baltic Biographies in Historical Crossroads, edited by A. Aarelaid-Tart, and L. Bennich-Björkman, 68–85. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jõesalu, K., and E. Kõresaar. 2013. “Continuity or Discontinuity: On the Dynamics of Remembering ’Mature Socialism’ in Estonian Post-Soviet Remembrance Culture.” Journal of Baltic Studies 44 (2): 177–203. doi:10.1080/01629778.2013.775849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansons, E. 2006. Čekas ģenerāļa piezīmes: Atmoda un VDK. Rīga: 1991. gada barikāžu dalībnieku biedrība.
   Google Scholar
• Jovchelovitch, S. 2012. “Narrative, Memory and Social Representations: A Conversation Between History and Social Psychology.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 46 (4): 440–456. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9217-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaprans, M. 2012a. ““Constructing Generational Identity in Post-communist Autobiographies: The Case of Latvia.” In Life Writing Matters in Europe, edited by M. Huisman, A. Ribberink, M. Soeting, and A. Hornung, 259–278. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kaprāns, M. 2009. “Padomju pieredzes (re)konstrukcija biogrāfiskajos vēstījumos: Latvijas lokālās preses analīze (1995–2005).” Latvijas Arhīvi 1/2: 162–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kaprāns, M. 2010b. “Social Commentary as Biographical Work: Post-Communist Autobiographies in Latvia.” Auto/Biography Studies 25 (2): 249–263. doi:10.1353/abs.2010.0028.
   Google Scholar
• Kaprans, M. 2012b. “Normalizing the Cold War habitus: How Latvian autobiographers cope with their Soviet-time experience.” In The Baltic Sea Region and the Cold War. Tartu Historical Studies, edited by O. Mertelsmann, and K. Piirimäe, Vol. 3, 261–277. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kaprans, M. 2010a. “Retrospective Anchoring of the Soviet Repressive System: The Autobiographies of the Latvian Intelligentsia.” In Between Fear and Freedom: Cultural Representations of the Cold War, edited by K. Starck, 193–206. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kaprāns, M. 2010c. “Padomju laika reprezentācija jaunākajā latviešu prozā (2000–2006).” In Laiku atšalkas: žurnālistika, kino, politika, edited by O. Proskurova, 189–202. Rīga: LU SPPI. http://www.szf.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/szf_faili/Petnieciba/sppi/mediji/Laiku_atsalkas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kargins, V. 2005. Nauda un cilvēki. Rīga: Atēna.
   Google Scholar
• Kavalieris, A. 2002. Pusgadsimts kriminālistikā. Rīga: Valters un Rapa.
   Google Scholar
• Kõresaar, E. 2001. “A Time Ignored? About the Role of the Soviet Period in Biographies of older Estonians.” Ethnologia Fennica. Finnish Studies in Ethnology 29: 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lasmanis, U. 2006. Dēla gadsimts. Rīga: U. Lasmanis.
   Google Scholar
• Liepiņš, J. 2003. Es sadarbojos ar KGB un CIP dubultaģentu Imantu Lešinski. Rīga: Atklātais sabiedriskais fonds ‘Latvietis’.
   Google Scholar
• Liepiņš, J. 2008. Sarkano okupantu orģijas Latvijā. Rīga: Biedrība “Domas spēks”.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J.-H. 2010. “Victimhood Nationalism in Contested Memories: National Mourning and Global Accountability.” In Memory in a Global Age, edited by A. Assmann, and S. Conrad, 138–162. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. H. 2005. “Social Representations of Events and People in World History Across 12 Cultures.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 36 (2): 171–191. doi:10.1177/0022022104272900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. H., and D. J. Hilton. 2005. “How the Past Weighs on the Present: Social Representations of History and Their Role in Identity Politics.” British Journal of Social Psychology 44 (4): 537–556. doi:10.1348/014466605X27162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, J. 2010. The Unfinished Revolution: Making Sense of the Communist Past in Central-Eastern Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marková, I. 2005. Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marková, I. 2012. “Method and Explanation in History and in Social Representations.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 46 (4): 457–474. doi:10.1007/s12124-012-9210-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. 1988. Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. 2000. Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. 2008. Psychoanalysis: Its Image and Its Public. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, M., and O. Shevchenko. 2004. “The Politics of Nostalgia: A Case for Comparative Analysis of Post-Socialist Practices.” Ab Impero 2: 487–519. doi:10.1353/imp.2004.0067.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, U. 2004. “Maintaining a Sense of Individual Autonomy under Conditions of Constraint: A Study of East German Managers.” In Biographical Methods and Professional Practice: An International Practice, edited by P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, and U. Apitzsch, 131–148. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nora, P. 1989. “Between Memory and History: Les lieux de mémoire.” Representations 26: 7–24. doi:10.1525/rep.1989.26.1.99p0274v.
   Google Scholar
• Olick, K. J., and J. Robbins. 1998. “Social Memory Studies: From ‘Collective Memory’ to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 105–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onken, E.-C. 2007. “The Baltic States and Moscow’s 9 May Commemoration: Analysing Memory Politics in Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies 59 (1): 23–46. doi:10.1080/09668130601072589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettai, E.-C., and V. Pettai. 2014. Transitional and Retrospective Justice in the Baltic States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philogène, G. 2001. “From Race to Culture: The Emergence of African American.” In Representations of the Social: Bridging Theoretical Tradition, edited by K. Deaux, and G. Philogène, 113–128. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Purs, L. 2006. Aizejot atskaties. Rīga: Signe/L. Purs.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. 2009. Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saleniece, I. 2005. “Latvian 20th Century History from the Perspective of Oral History Sources. The Views of Russians from Eastern Latvia.” Pro Ethnologia 19: 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sebre, S. 2010. “Pride, Suspicion and Trust Represented in Narratives from Latvia During the 1990s.” In Inheriting the 1990s: The Baltic Countries, Studia Uralica Upsaliensia 37, edited by B. Metuzale-Kangere, 26–37. Upssala: Edita Västra Aros.
   Google Scholar
• Skultans, V. 1998. The Testimony of Lives: Narrative and Memory in Post-Soviet Latvia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W. G. Austin, and S. Worchel, 33–47. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Troebst, S. 2010. “Halecki Revisited: Europe’s Conflicting Cultures of Remembrance.” In A European Memory? Contested Histories and Politics of Remembrance, edited by M. Pakier, and B. Stråth, 56–63. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ulmanis, G. 1995. No tevis jau neprasa daudz. Rīga: Likteņstāsti.
   Google Scholar
• Voelklein, C., and C. Howarth. 2005. “A Review of Controversies about Social Representations Theory: A British Debate.” Culture & Psychology 11 (4): 431–454. doi:10.1177/1354067X05058586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voslenskii, M. 2005. Nomenklatura. Moskva: Zakharov.
   Google Scholar
• Vulfsons, M. 1997. Kārtis uz galda! Rīga: Liesma.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., and N. Hayes. 2005. Everyday Discourse and Common Sense – the Theory of Social Representations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wagoner, B. 2015. “Collective Remembering as a Process of Social Representation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations, edited by G. Sammut et al., 143–162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wawrzyniak, J., and M. Pakier. 2013. “Memory Studies in Eastern Europe: Key Issues and Future Perspectives.” Polish Sociological Review 183 (3): 257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Wulf, M., and G. Petri. 2010. “Generating Meaning Across Generations. The Role of Historians in the Codification of History in Soviet and Post-Soviet Estonia.” Journal of Baltic Studies 41 (3): 351–382. doi:10.1080/01629778.2010.498210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurchak, A. 2006. Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zake, I. 2010. “Politicians versus Intellectuals in the Lustration Debates in Transitional Latvia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 26 (3): 389–412. doi:10.1080/13523279.2010.496327.
   Google Scholar
• Zlakomanovs, N. 2000. Izmeklēšanas priekšnieka atmiņas. Rīga: N.Zlakomanovs.
   Google Scholar