The European Union’s Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR): improving multilevel governance in Baltic Sea cooperation?

References

• Archer, C., and T. Etzold. 2008. “The EU’s Northern Dimension: Blurring Frontiers between Russia and the EU North?” Nordeuropa-Forum 1: 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Beazley, C. 2007. “An EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Making a Success of the 2004 Enlargement.” Baltic Rim Economies 6: 14.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, R. 2009. “An EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Good Intentions Meet Complex Challenges.” European Policy Analysis, (Sieps Series) 9. Stockholm: SIEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and C.M. Radaelli. 2011. “The politics of governance architectures: creation, change and effects of the EU Lisbon Strategy.” Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 463–484.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2011). Council Conclusions on the Review of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region, 3125th General Affairs Council Meeting, Brussels, 15 November.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2009. Presidency Conclusions, 5265/1/09, REV 1, Brussels, 1 December 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Etzold, T. (2010). Live and Let Die. Adaptability and Endurance of Regional Organisations in Northern Europe. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Politics and Philosophy, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Etzold, T. 2013. “The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: Linking the Regional with the EU Level.” Government Gazette (Baltic Sea Special) March. 11.
   Google Scholar
• Etzold, T., and S. Gänzle. 2012. “Creating a Coherent Framework for Baltic Sea Cooperation.” In Political State of the Region Report 2012: Dilemmas and Coherence in the Baltic Sea Region, edited by Henningsen, and T. Etzold, 54–63. Copenhagen: Baltic Development Forum.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Communication from the Commission ‘Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region’. COM(2009) 248/3 Final. Brussels 10.6.2009
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Report from the Commission on the Implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR). COM(2011) 381 Final Brussels. 22.6.2011
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013a. Report from the Commission to Concerning the Added Value of Macro-regional Strategies. COM(2013) 468 Final. Brussels 27.6.2013
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013b. Commission Staff Working Document Concerning the Added Value of Macro-regions. SWD(2013) 233 Final Brussels. 27.6.2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013c. Commission Staff Working Document Concerning the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Action Plan. February Version, SEC(2009), 712/2 Brussels. 27.6.2013
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2010. The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Background and Analysis. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EUSBSR News. May 2012. INTERACT Point. Turku: Interact.
   Google Scholar
• EUSBSR News. March 2013. INTERACT Point. Turku: Interact.
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., and K. Kern, eds. 2016a. A ‘Macro-regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., and K. Kern. 2016b. “The European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.” In A ‘Macro-regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence, ed. by S. Gänzle, and K. Kern, 123–144. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., and -J.-J. Wulf. (2014). “Briefing Note – The Emerging Core of the EU’s Macro-regional Governance Architecture: Mapping the Roles, Tasks and Self-Perceptions of Priority Area Coordinators and Horizontal Action Leaders in the EU Strategies for the Baltic Sea and the Danube Regions.” ISL Working Paper 1, University of Agder.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, J. 2010. “A Look at the Baltic Sea Strategy.” Baltic Rim Economies 5: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Helcom Commission. 2015. Increasing synergies with the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR) - Ways to institutionalize the cooperation between HELCOM and EUSBSR, mimeo. http://helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/HELCOM%20input%20on%20synergies%20with%20EUSBSR%2024%20Feb%202015-rev.pdf (accessed on March 11, 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Helsinki Commission. 2007. HELCOM’sBaltic Sea Action Plan: A New Environmental Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. 15 November. Krakow: HELCOM Ministerial Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel, H., and S. Gänzle. 2002. “Der Ostseerat: Neue Funktionen subregionaler Zusammenarbeit im Kontext der EU-Osterweiterung.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 19-20: 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, M., S. Sanberg, and K. Kern. 2007. “Actors and Arenas in Hybrid Networks Implications for Environmental Policy-making in the Baltic Sea Region.” Ambio 35 (3): 237–242. doi:10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[237:AAAIHN]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joenniemi, P. 2010. “The EU strategy for the Baltic Sea region– a First Step.” Baltic Rim Economies 1: 33.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. 2009. “Rescaling Europe.” Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10 (1): 34–50. doi:10.1080/15705850802699995.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, K. 2011. “Governance for Sustainable Development in the Baltic Sea Region.” Journal of Baltic Studies 42 (1): 21–35. doi:10.1080/01629778.2011.538517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, K., and S. Gänzle. 2013. “Towards Cruising Speed? Assessing the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.” In European Policy Analysis. (Sieps Series) 17. Stockholm: SIEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, K., and T. Löffelsend. 2008. “Governance Beyond the Nation State. Transnationalization and Europeanization of the Baltic Sea Region.” In Governing a Common Sea: Environmental Policies in the Baltic Sea Region, ed. by M. Joas, D. Jahn, and K. Kern, 115–141. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, K. 2001. “Transnationale Städtenetzwerke in Europa.” In Empirische Policy- und Verwaltungsforschung. Lokale, nationale und internationale Perspektiven, ed. by E. Schröter, 95–116. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Kodric, M. (2011). “The EU Strategy for the Danube Region: What Potential Contribution to Regional Stability and Co-operation?” Bruges Regional Integration & Global Governance Papers 4, Bruges.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, J. 2013. “The Council of the Baltic Sea States in the Era of Regional Strategies, Networks and Projects.” Baltic Rim Economies 10 (1): 15.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. 1996. “An Actor-Centred Approach to Multi-Level Governance.” Regional & Federal Studies 6 (2): 20–38. doi:10.1080/13597569608420966.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. 1993. “Structural Policy and Multi-Level Governance in the EC.” In The State of the European Community. The Maastricht Debates and Beyond, ed. by A. Cafruny, and G. Rosenthal, 391–410. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G. 1992. “Structural Policy in the European Community.” In Euro-politics. Institutions and Policymaking in the “New” European Community, ed. by A. Sbragia, 191–225. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2010a. The Theory of Multilevel Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2016. “Exploring European Union Macro-regional Strategies through the Lens of Multilevel Governance.” In A ‘Macro-regional’ Europe in the Making. Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Evidence, ed. by S. Gänzle, and K. Kern, 75–98. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2010b. “The Evolution of the Studies of European Union Multi-Level Governance.” In Multi-level Governance and Intergovernmental Relations in the European Union and the United States: Theoretical Perspectives, ed. by E. Ongaro, A. Massey, M. Holzer, and E. Wayenberg, 159–185. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rostoks, T. 2010. “In Place of an Introduction: Why the Baltic Sea Strategy?” In The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: A Year After and Beyond, ed. by Ž. Ozoliņa, I. Reinholde, and T. Rostoks, 9–40. Riga: Zinatne.
   Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. 2012. Action Plan on the Strategy of Social and Economic Development of the North-West Federal District until 2020, 1939. Moscow, October 16, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schymik, C., and P. Krumrey. (2009). “EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Core Europe in the Northern Periphery?” SWP Working Paper. April, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. 2011. “Policy and Planning Brief.” European Macro-regional Strategies: Indications of Spatial Rescaling“. Planning Theory and Practice 12 (1): 163-167.
   Google Scholar
• Tholoniat, L. 2010. “The Career of the Open Method of Coordination: Lessons from a “Soft” EU Instrument.” West European Politics 33 (1): 93–117. doi:10.1080/01402380903354122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union of Baltic Cities (UBC). (2009). Cities for Sustainable and Prosperous Baltic Sea Region. UBC Strategy 2010-2015, adopted at the X UBC General Conference. Kristiansand, September.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, J., and K. Kern. 2013. “The External Dimension of EU Marine Governance: Institutional Interplay between the European Union and the International Maritime Organisation.” Global Environmental Governance 13 (1): 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, B. (2011). Environmental Governance and Institutional Interaction in the Baltic Sea Region: Effective Governance or Institutional Entanglement? Master thesis, Philipps University Marburg.
   Google Scholar