Masculinity in flux? Male managers navigating between work and family

References

• Acker, J. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, T. D., D. E. L. Herst, C. S. Bruck, and M. Sutton. 2000. “Consequences Associated with Work-to-Family Conflict: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.” Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 5 (2): 278–308. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aspers, P. 2009. “Empirical Phenomenology: A Qualitative Research Approach.” Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 9 (2): 1–12. doi:10.1080/20797222.2009.11433992.
   Google Scholar
• Bailyn, L. 2011. “Redesigning Work for Gender Equity and Work–Personal Life Integration.” Community, Work & Family 14 (1): 97–112. doi:10.1080/13668803.2010.532660.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Penguin Putnam.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, S. 2011. “Dimensions of Dignity: Defining Future of Work.” In The Edward Elgar Research Handbook on Work and Employment Relations, edited by K. Townsend and A. Wilkinson, 370–384. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. 1991. “The Narrative Construction of Reality.” Critical Inquiry 18 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1086/448619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bučaitė-Vilkė, J., and A. Tereškinas. 2016. “Lithuanian Men’s Struggles with Precarious Life: Unemployment, Working Identities, and Strategies of Survival.” Journal of Baltic Studies 47 (2): 197–218. doi:10.1080/01629778.2015.1105832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, S. B., C. J. Gatrell, C. L. Cooper, and P. Sparrow. 2013. “Fathers at Work: A Ghost in the Organizational Machine.” Gender, Work and Organization 20 (6): 632–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D. S., J. G. Grzywacz, and S. Zivnuska. 2009. “Is Work–Family Balance More than Conflict and Enrichment?” Human Relations 62 (10): 1459–1486. doi:10.1177/0018726709336500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-García, C., and M. Pazos-Moran. 2016. “Parental Leave Policy and Gender Equality in Europe.” Feminist Economics 22 (3): 51–73. doi:10.1080/13545701.2015.1082033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, I., and E. Ruspini. 2015. “Transition to Fatherhood: New Perspectives in the Global Context of Changing Men Identities.” International Review of Sociology 25 (3): 353–358. doi:10.1080/03906701.2015.1078529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutch, F. 2007. “Undoing Gender.” Gender and Society 21 (1): 106–127. doi:10.1177/0891243206293577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doldor, E., D. Anderson, and S. Vinnicombe. 2013. “Refining the Concept of Political Will: A Gender Perspective.” British Journal of Management 24 (3): 414–427. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00812.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drews, L. V., F. W. Cybulski, I. V. Gíslason, G. H. Atlason, J. Reingardienė, A. Tereškinas, A. Zdanevičius, and C. Callus. 2005. Father on Parental Leave: A Joint Report Based on Qualitative Research with Fathers on Leave, Employers and Decision Makers in Lithuania, Iceland, Denmark and Malta. Vilnius: Eugrimas, Center for Equality Advancement. http://gap.lt/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Fathers-on-Parental-Leave.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dulk, D. L., P. Peters, E. Poutsma, and P. E. M. Ligthart. 2010. “The Extended Business Case for Childcare and Leave Arrangements in Western and Eastern Europe.” Baltic Journal of Management 5 (2): 156–184. doi:10.1108/17465261011045106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and W. Wood. 2012. “Social Role Theory.” In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, edited by P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins, 458–476. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T., B. Janzen, S. Abonyi, and I. Kelly. 2012. “Factors Associated with Perceived Time Pressure among Employed Mothers and Fathers.” Psychology 3 (2): 165–174. doi:10.4236/psych.2012.32025.
   Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. 2007. “Whose Child Is It Anyway? The Negotiation of Paternal Entitlements within Marriage.” Sociological Review 55 (2): 353–373. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00709.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatrell, C. J., S. B. Burnett, C. L. Cooper, and P. Sparrow. 2013. “Work-Life Balance and Parenthood: A Comparative Review of Definitions, Equity and Enrichment.” International Journal of Management Reviews 15: 300–316. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00341.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, M. J. 1960. “The Theory of Role Strain.” American Sociology Review 25 (4): 489–496. doi:10.2307/2092933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. A., and M. A. Dixon. 2014. “Coaching Fathers in Conflict: A Review of the Tensions Surrounding the Work-Family Interface.” Journal of Sport Management 28: 447–456. doi:10.1123/jsm.2013-0241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. A., and M. A. Dixon. 2017. “Balance among Coach Fathers: A Qualitative Examination of Enrichment, Conflict, and Role Management Strategies.” Journal of Sport Management 31: 288–305. doi:10.1123/jsm.2016-0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhaus, J. H., and N. J. Beutell. 1985. “Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles.” Academy of Management Review 10: 76–88. doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, J. H., and G. N. Powell. 2006. “When Work and Family are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment.” Academy of Management Review 31: 72–92. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.19379625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzywacz, J. G., and N. F. Marks. 2000. “Reconceptualizing the Work-Family Interface: An Ecological Perspective on the Correlates of Positive and Negative Spillover between Work and Family.” Occupational Health Psychology 5 (1): 111–126. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guest, G., K. M. MacQueen, and E. E. Namey. 2012. “Introduction to Applied Thematic Analysis.” In Applied Thematic Analysis, edited by G. Guest, K. M. MacQueen, and E. E. Namey, 3–20. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, L., and C. P. Hwang. 2013. “Trade Union Support for Fathers’ Use of Work-Family Benefits: Lessons from Sweden.” Community, Work and Family 16 (1): 46–67. doi:10.1080/13668803.2012.724272.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, S. 2015. “(In)significant Others: The Role of the Spouse in Women and Men Managers’ Careers in Finland.” PhD diss., University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, S., and A.-M. Lämsä. 2017. “Narratives of Spousal Support for the Careers of Men in Managerial Posts.” Gender, Work and Organization 24 (2): 171–193. doi:10.1111/gwao.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, B. 2011. “The Agency Gap in Work-Life Balance: Applying Sen’s Capabilities Framework within European Contexts.” Social Politics 18 (2): 147–167. doi:10.1093/sp/jxr012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, B., and S. Fahlen. 2009. “Competing Scenarios for European Fathers: Applying Sen’s Capabilities and Agency Framework to Work–Family Balance.” The Annals of the AAPSS 624: 214–233. doi:10.1177/0002716209334435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juraitė, K., and A. Zdanevičius. 2004. “Lyčių lygybės vertinimai ir Lietuvos viešoji nuomonė.” Sociologija: Mintis ir veiksmas 3: 95–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, E., A.-M. Lämsä, and S. Heikkinen. 2017. “Father Managers (Un)doing Traditional Masculinity.” In Fatherhood in Contemporary Discourse: Focus on Fathers, edited by A. Pilinska, 17–30. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, G. 2013. Superdads: How Fathers Balance Work and Family in the 21st Century. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, G. 2018. “Barriers to Equality: Why British Fathers Do Not Use Parental Leave.” Community, Work & Family 21 (3): 310–325. doi:10.1080/13668803.2017.1307806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammi-Taskula, J. 2006. “Nordic Men on Parental Leave.” In Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia, edited by A. Ellingsaeter and A. Leira, 79–100. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lämsä, A.-M., T. Auvinen, S. Heikkinen, and T. Sintonen. 2018. “Narrativity and Its Application in Business Ethics Research.” Baltic Journal of Management 13 (2): 279–296. doi:10.1108/BJM-06-2017-0196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRossa, R. 1988. “Renewing Our Faith in Qualitative Family Research.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 17 (3): 243–260. doi:10.1177/089124188017003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. 1997. “‘Family Friendly’ Employment Policies: A Route to Changing Organizational Culture or Playing about at the Margins?” Gender, Work and Organization 4 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00020.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, L., A.-M. Lämsä, S. Heikkinen, and J. Tanskanen. 2017. “Work-to-Personal-Life Conflict among Dual and Single-Career Expatriates–Is It Different for Men and Women?” Journal of Global Mobility 5 (3): 304–316. doi:10.1108/JGM-12-2016-0065.
   Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S., and V. I. Arreola. 2016. “Gendered Organizations: How Human Resource Management Practices Produce and Reproduce Administrative Man.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 38: 137–149. doi:10.1080/10841806.2015.1130523.
   Google Scholar
• Mihelič, K. K. 2014. “Work-Family Interface, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: A CEE Transition Country Perspective.” Baltic Journal of Management 9 (4): 446–466. doi:10.1108/BJM-09-2013-0141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomaguchi, K. M., M. A. Milkie, and S. M. Bianchi. 2005. “Time Strain and Psychological Well-Being: Do Dual-Earner Mothers and Fathers Differ?” Journal of Family Issues 26: 756–792. doi:10.1177/0192513X05277524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates-Indruchova, L. 2006. “The Void of Acceptable Masculinity during the Czech State Socialism: The Case of Radek John’s Memento.” Men and Masculinities 8 (4): 428–450. doi:10.1177/1097184X04265988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, S., and J. H. Greenhouse. 2002. “Towards Reducing Some Critical Gaps in Work-Family Research.” Human Resource Management Review 12: 299–312. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00062-1.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., and R. F. Bales. 1955. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process. Glencoe: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisier, I., M. I. Broese van Groenou, and S. Keuzenkamp. 2015. “Combining Work and Informal Care: The Importance of Caring Organisations.” Human Resource Management Journal 25 (2): 267–280. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pučėtaitė, R., V. Jurėnienė, and A. Novelskaitė. 2014. “Lithuania: CSR on a Wishlist.” In Trade Unions and Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, edited by L. Preuss, M. Gold, and C. Rees, 100–117. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pučėtaitė, R., A.-M. Lämsä, and A. Novelskaitė. 2010. “Organizations Which Have the Strongest Potential for High-Level Organizational Trust in a Low-Trust Societal Context.” Transformations in Business and Economics 9 (2): 318–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvaneckas, A., and G. Purvaneckienė. 2001. Moteris Lietuvos Visuomenėje. Vilnius: Danielius.
   Google Scholar
• Reddick, R. J., A. B. Rochlen, J. R. Grasso, E. D. Reilly, and D. D. Spikes. 2012. “Academic Fathers Pursuing Tenure: A Qualitative Study of Work-Family Conflict, Coping Strategies and Departmental Culture.” Psychology of Men and Masculinity 13: 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0023206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reingardienė, J. 2004. “Moterų karjeros ir šeimos dilemos.” Sociologija: Mintis ir veiksmas 1: 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter, H. 2010. “‘In My Opinion, Work Would Be in First Place and Family in Second’: Young Women’s Imagined Gender–Work Relations in Post-Soviet Lithuania.” Journal of Baltic Studies 41 (4): 531–551. doi:10.1080/01629778.2010.527139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riska, E., and A. Novelskaitė. 2008. “Professionals in Transition: Physicians’ Careers, Migration and Gender in a Post-Soviet Era.” In Rethinking Professional Governance: International Directions in Health Care, edited by E. Kuhlmann and M. Saks, 217–230. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runte, M., and A. J. Mills. 2004. “Paying the Toll: A Feminist Post-Structural Critique of the Discourse Bridging Work and Family.” Culture and Organization 10 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1080/14759550412331297165.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, S. D. 1974. “Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation.” American Sociological Review 39 (4): 567–578. doi:10.2307/2094422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SODRA. 2018. “Portal of Statistics.” Accessed 30 March 2018. http://atvira.sodra.lt/lt-eur/Accessed
   Google Scholar
• Šumskaitė, L. 2014. “Norminis vyriškumas tėvystės praktikose.” Socialine teorija, empirija ir praktika 8: 33–50. doi:10.15388/STEPP.2014.0.2663.
   Google Scholar
• Tereškinas, A. 2004. “Tarp norminio ir subordinuoto vyriškumo formų: vyrai, jų seksualumas ir maskulinizmo politika šiuolaikinėje Lietuvoje.” Sociologija: Mintis ir veiksmas 3: 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tereškinas, A. 2006. “Vyriškumas ir tėvystė: Lietuvos vyrų tėvystės atostogose atvejis.” Lyciu studijos ir tyrimai 2: 90–96.
   Google Scholar
• Tereškinas, A. 2009. “Social Suffering, Post-Soviet Masculinities and Working Class Men.” Social Sciences = Socialiniai mokslai 2 (64): 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tereškinas, A. 2014. “Masculinity Scripts, Good Life and Familial Intentions: The Case of Young Lithuanian Men.” Social Sciences = Socialiniai mokslai 4 (86): 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, C. 2013. Grounded Theory for Qualitative Research: Practical Guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Valackienė, A. 2003. “Profesinę karjerą sąlygojantys veiksniai: subjektyvus vertinimas.” Profesinis rengimas: tyrimai ir realijos 7: 110–127.
   Google Scholar