Intentions to stay or to return among highly skilled Latvians in the EU: who is more likely to return?

References

• Aikins, K., and N. White. 2011. Global Diaspora Strategies Toolkit. Dublin: Diaspora Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Apsite, E. 2011. “Will They Return? Latvian Immigrants in the United Kingdom.” In European Integration and Baltic Sea Region: Diversity and Perspectives, edited by T. Muravska, 11–25. Riga: University of Latvia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borjas, G. J., and B. Bratsberg. 1996. “Who Leaves? The Outmigration of the Foreign-Born.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (1): 165–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2109856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling, J., and K. Hoelscher. 2013. “The Capacity and Desire to Remit: Comparing Local and Transnational Influences.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39 (6): 939–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.765657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling, J., and M. B. Erdal. 2014. “Return Migration and Transnationalism: How are the Two Connected?” International Migration 52 (6): 2–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling, J., and S. V. Pettersen. 2014. “Return Migration Intentions in the Integration–Transnationalism Matrix.” International Migration 52 (6): 13–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassarino, J. -P. 2004. “Theorising return migration: the conceptual approach to return migration revisited.” International Journal on Multicultural Societies 6(2): 253–279.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, A., and D. S. Massey. 2002. “Return Migration by German Guestworkers: Neoclassical versus New Economic Theories.” International Migration 40 (4): 5–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2435.00204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bree, J., T. Davids, and H. De Haas. 2010. “Post-return Experiences and Transnational Belonging of Return Migrants: A Dutch-Moroccan Case Study.” Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs 10 (4): 489–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00299.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haas, H. 2006. Engaging Diasporas: How Governments and Development Agencies Can Support Diasporas Involvement in the Development of Origin Countries. A Study for Oxfam Novib. Oxford: University of Oxford International Migration Institute.
   Google Scholar
• De Haas, H., and T. Fokkema. 2011. “The Effects of Integration and Transnational Ties on International Return Migration Intentions.” Demographic Research 25: 755–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haas, H., T. Fokkema, and M. F. Fihri. 2015. “Return Migration as Failure or Success? The Determinants of Return Migration Intentions among Moroccan Migrants in Europe.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 16 (2): 415–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-014-0344-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, G. F. 2000. “Expectations, Gender, and Norms in Migration Decision-Making.” Population Studies 54 (3): 307–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713779089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustmann, C. 2003. “Return Migration, Wage Differentials, and the Optimal Migration Duration.” European Economic Review 47 (2): 353–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00184-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engbersen, G., E. Snel, and J. De Boom. 2010. “A Van Full of Poles: Liquid Migration in Eastern and Central European Countries.” In A Continent Moving West? EU Enlargement and Labour Migration from Central and Eastern Europe, edited by R. Black, G. Engbersen, M. Okólski, and C. Pantîru, 115–140. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engbersen, G., and J. Jansen. 2013. “Emigration from the Baltic States: Economic Impact and Policy Implications.” In Coping with Emigration in Baltic and East European Countries, edited by the OECD, 13–27. Paris: OECD. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204928-en.
   Google Scholar
• Faist, T. 1998. “Transnational Social Spaces Out of International Migration: Evolution, Significance and Future Prospects.” European Journal of Sociology 39 (2): 213–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975600007621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, D. 2000. Negotiating Extra-Territorial Citizenship: Mexican Migration and the Transnational Politics of Community. San Diego: University of California Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Franses, P. H. 2015. “Return Migration of High Skilled Workers: The Case of Suriname.” Econometric Institute Report 2015-03. Rotterdam: Erasmus School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Gamlen, A. 2006. “Diaspora Engagement Policies: What are They, and What Kind of States Use Them?.” Working Paper 32. Oxford: University of Oxford Centre on Migration, Policy and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J., and D. McKenzie. 2009. “The Microeconomic Determinants of Emigration and Return Migration of the Best and the Brightest: Evidence from the Pacific.” IZA discussion paper 3926. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., L. Basch, and C. Blanc-Szanton. 1992. “Transnationalism: A New Analytic Framework for Understanding Migration.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 645 (1 Towards a Tra): 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33484.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glorious, B. 2013. “Understanding the Counter-flow: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects in Studying Remigration Processes after EU Expansion.” In Mobility in Transition: Migration Patterns after EU Enlargement, edited by B. Glorius, I. Grabowska-Lusinska, and A. Kuvik, 217–236. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Güngör, N. D., and A. Tansel. 2008. “Brain Drain from Turkey: An Investigation of Students’ Return Intentions.” Applied Economics 40 (23): 3069–3087. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600993999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazans, M. 2015. “Smadzeņu Aizplūde No Latvijas 21. Gadsimtā.” In Latvijas Emigrantu Kopienas: Cerību Diaspora, edited by I. Mieriņa, 85–92. Riga: Latvijas Universitātes Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūts.
   Google Scholar
• Hazans, M. 2016. Atgriešanās Latvijā. Remigrantu Aptaujas Rezultāti. Riga: Latvijas Universitātes Diasporas un migrācijas pētījumu centrs.
   Google Scholar
• Hazans, M. 2018. Labour Market Policy Thematic Review 2018: An In-depth Analysis of the Emigration of Skilled Labour. Latvia. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8132&furtherPubs=yes
   Google Scholar
• Hazans, M. 2019. “Emigration from Latvia: A Brief History and Driving Forces in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Emigrant Communities of Latvia: National Identity, Transnational Belonging, and Diaspora Politics, edited by R. Kaša and I. Mieriņa, 35–68. Basel: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Hercog, M., and M. Z. Siddiqui. 2014. “Experiences in the Host Countries and Return Plans: The Case Study of Highly Skilled Indians in Europe.” In Indian Skilled Migration and Development. To Europe and Back, edited by G. Tejada, U. Bhattacharya, B. Khadria, and C. Kuptsch, 213–235. New Delhi: Springer India. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1810-4_9.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, K., and M. Sumption. 2016. Reaching a “Fair Deal” on Talent: Emigration, Circulation, and Human Capital in Countries of Origin. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kivisto, P. 2001. “Theorizing Transnational Immigration: A Critical Review of Current Efforts.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 24 (4): 549–577. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120049789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klagge, B., and K. Klein-Hitpaß. 2008. High-skilled Return Migration and Knowledge-based Economic Development in Regional Perspective. Conceptual Considerations and the Example of Poland. Warsaw: Warsaw University Centre of Migration Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kļave, E., and I. Šūpule. 2017. “Latvian and Language Competition in the Diaspora (Emigrant Community).” In Language Situation in Latvia: 2010–2015: A Sociolinguistic Study, edited by G. Kļava, 123–155. Riga: Latviešu valodas aģentūra.
   Google Scholar
• Kļave, E., and I. Šūpule. 2019. “Return Migration Process in Policy and Practice.” In The Emigrant Communities of Latvia: National Identity, Transnational Belonging, and Diaspora Politics, edited by R. Kaša and I. Mieriņa, 261–282. Basel: Springer Open.
   Google Scholar
• Klein-Hitpaß, K. 2016. “Return Migrants as Knowledge Brokers and Institutional Innovators: New Theoretical Conceptualisations and the Example of Poland.” In Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe: Mobility against the Stream, edited by R. Nadler, Z. Kovács, B. Glorius, and T. Lang, 55–81. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Krisjane, Z., E. Apsite-Berina, and M. Bērziņš. 2016. “Circularity within the EU: The Return Intentions of Latvian Migrants.” In Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe: Mobility against the Stream, edited by R. Nadler, Z. Kovács, B. Glorius, and T. Lang, 215–240. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Latvia, C. S. B. 2019. “Table IBG041. International Long-term Migration by Ethnicity of Migrants.” Central Statistical Bureau website. https://data1.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/en/iedz/iedz__migr/IBG041.px/Accessed 20 September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, P., and N. Glick Schiller. 2004. “Conceptualizing Simultaneity: A Transnational Social Field Perspective on Society.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 1002–1039. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makina, M. 2012. “Determinants of Return Migration Intentions: Evidence from Zimbabwean Migrants Living in South Africa.” Development Southern Africa 29 (3): 365–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835X.2012.706034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum, D., E. Apsite-Berina, M. Berzins, and Z. Krisjane. 2017. “Overcoming the Crisis: The Changing Profile and Trajectories of Latvian Migrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (9): 1508–1525. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1232161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, D., C. Moreh, and A. Vlachantoni. 2017. “An ‘Undeliberate Determinacy?’ the Changing Migration Strategies of Polish Migrants in the UK in Times of Brexit.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (13): 2109–2130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1299622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieriņa, I., L. Ose, and A. Lāce. 2017. Vienojošas Nacionālās Identitātes Un Latvijas Kultūrtelpas Nostiprināšana. Priekšlikumi Sabiedrības Integrācijas Politikas Plānam 2019.–2025. Gadam. Ekspertu Ziņojums. Riga: Latvijas Universitāte.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economics. 2016. Informatīvais Ziņojums Par Darba Tirgus Vidēja Un Ilgtermiņa Prognozēm. Riga: Ministry of Economics. https://www.em.gov.lv/files/tautsaimniecibas_attistiba/dsp/EMZino_06_160616.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Newland, K., and S. Plaza. 2013. What We Know about Diasporas and Economic Development. Policy Brief. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Portes, A., L. E. Guarnizo, and P. Landolt. 1999. “The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 22 (2): 217–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pries, L., ed. 1999. Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pries, L. 2016. “Circular Migration as (New) Strategy in Migration Policy? Lessons from Historical and Sociological Migration Research.” In Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe: Mobility against the Stream, edited by R. Nadler, Z. Kovács, B. Glorius, and T. Lang, 23–54. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pungas, E., O. Toomet, T. Tammaru, and K. Anniste. 2012. “Are Better Educated Migrants Returning? Evidence from Multi-Dimensional Education Data.” Norface Migration Discussion Paper 2012–18. Tartu: University of Tartu. http://www.norface-migration.org/publ_uploads/NDP_18_12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sahoo, S., and B. K. Pattanaik, eds. 2014. Global Diasporas and Development. Socioeconomic, Cultural, and Policy Perspectives. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, O. 1991. The Migration of Labour. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sue, V. M., and L. A. Ritter. 2012. Conducting Online Surveys. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Šūpule, I., and E. Kļave. 2018. “Belonging and Returning Home: Deconstruction of Latvian Returnees’ National Identity.” Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia 26 (1): 4–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.26.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Tejada, G., U. Bhattacharya, B. Khadria, and C. Kuptsch, eds. 2014. Indian Skilled Migration and Development: To Europe and Back. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tezcan, T. 2019. “Return Home? Determinants of Return Migration Intention Amongst Turkish Immigrants in Germany.” Geoforum 98: 189–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorat, S., and K. S. Newman, eds. 2010. Blocked by Caste: Economic Discrimination in Modern India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todaro, M. 1969. “A Model of Labor Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries.” The American Economic Review 59(1): 138–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. 2004. “Migrant Transnationalism and Modes of Transformation.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 970–1001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00226.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldinger, R. 2017. “A Cross-Border Perspective on Migration: Beyond the Assimilation/Transnationalism Debate.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (1): 3–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1238863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldorf, B. 1995. “Determinants of International Return Migration Intentions.” The Professional Geographer 47 (2): 125–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1995.00125.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A., and N. Glick Schiller. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-state Building, Migration and the Social Sciences.” Global Networks 2 (4): 301–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00043.
   Google Scholar
• Yahirun, J. J. 2014. “‘Take Me “Home:”’ Return Migration among Germany’s Older Immigrants.” International Migration 52 (4): 231–254. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepa, B., I. Šūpule, E. Kļave, L. Krastiņa, J. Krišāne, and I. Tomsone. 2005. Ethnopolitical Tension in Latvia: Looking for the Conflict Solution. Riga: Baltic Institute of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Zepa, B., I. Šūpule, and L. Krastiņa. 2011. Integration: Practice and Perspectives. A Sociological Study of Society Integration. Lambert: Saarbrucken.
   Google Scholar
• Zweig, D. 2006. “Learning to Compete: China’s Efforts to Encourage a ‘Reverse Brain Drain.’.” In Competing for Global Talent, edited by C. Kuptsch and P. Eng Fong, 187–214. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
   Google Scholar