Presidents between national unity and ethnic divisions: public trust across the Baltic states

References

• Agarin, T. 2013. “Resident Aliens? Explaining Minority Disaffection with Democratic Politics in the Baltic States.” Ethnopolitics 12 (4): 331–351. doi:10.1080/17449057.2012.748247.
   Google Scholar
• Amorim, N. O., and M. Costa Lobo. 2009. “Portugal’s Semi-Presidentialism (Re)considered: An Assessment of the President’s Role in the Policy Process, 1976-2006.” European Journal of Political Research 48 (2): 234–255. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00833.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auers, D. 2013. “Latvia.” In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe, edited by S. Berglund, J. Ekman, K. Deegan-Krause, and T. Knutsen, 85–124. Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Auers, D. 2015. Comparative Politics and Government of the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Barrabi, T. 2015. “Amid Threats, Latvia, Russia Should Develop ‘Good Neighborly Relations,’ Latvian President Says.” International Business Times, 25 June. Accessed 23 July 2017. http://www.ibtimes.com/amid-threats-latvia-russia-should-develop-good-neighborly-relations-latvian-president-1983493
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, T. A. 1996. “Presidents versus Prime Ministers: Shaping Executive Authority in Eastern Europe.” World Politics 48 (3): 297–323. doi:10.1353/wp.1996.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boda, Z., and G. Medve-Bálint. 2014. “Does Institutional Trust in East Central Europe Differ from Western Europe?” European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities 3 (2): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Braunmüller, K., and G. Ferraresi. 2003. Aspects of Multilingualism in European Language History. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cheskin, A. 2016. Russian Speakers in Post-Soviet Latvia: Discursive Identity Strategies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cianetti, L. 2019. The Quality of Divided Democracies Minority Inclusion, Exclusion, and Representation in the New Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2019. “Corruption Perceptions Index: Estonia”. Accessed 20 July 2020 https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2019/results/est
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. 2005. “The Social Transformation of Trust in Government.” International Review of Sociology 15 (1): 133–154. doi:10.1080/03906700500038819.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 1999. Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, D., and R. Elgie. 2016. “Maximizing the Reliability of Cross-National Measures of Presidential Power.” British Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 731–741. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvold, K. 2017. “When Left and Right Is a Matter of Identity: Overlapping Political Dimensions in Estonia and Latvia.” In Borders in the Baltic Sea Region: Suturing the Ruptures, edited by A. Makarychev and A. Yatsyk, 125–146. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duvold, K., S. Berglund, and J. Ekman. 2020. Political Culture in the Baltic States: Between National and European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Duvold, K., and J. Ekman. 2016. “Nationality-driven Soviet Nostalgia Determinants of Retrospective Regime Evaluation in the Baltic States.” Twentieth Century Communism 11 (11): 43–66. doi:10.3898/175864316819698495.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. 1965. A System Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. 1975. “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435–457. doi:10.1017/S0007123400008309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecevit, Y. A., and E. Karakoc. 2017. “The Perils of Semi-Presidentialism: Confidence in Political Institutions in Contemporary Democracies.” International Political Science Review 38 (1): 4–20. doi:10.1177/0192512115599243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eek, D., and B. Rothstein. 2009. “Political Corruption and Social Trust: An Experiment Approach. “ Rationality and Society 21 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehin, P. 2003. “Determinants of Public Support for EU Membership: Data from the Baltic Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 40 (1): 31–56. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehin, P. 2007. “Political Support in the Baltic States, 1993–2004.” Journal of Baltic Studies 38 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/01629770701223486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., S. Berglund, and K. Duvold. 2015. Post-Crimea Barometer. Datafile. Huddinge: Södertörn University.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., K. Duvold, and S. Berglund. 2014. Baltic Barometer 2014. Datafile. Huddinge: Södertörn University.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R. 2011. Semi-Presidentialism: Subtypes and Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, R., and S. Moestrup, eds. 2008. Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epperly, B. 2019. “The Myth of the Post-Communist Citizen: Communist Legacies and Political Trust.” Social Science History 43 (2) 297–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. Accessed 29 June 2018 http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm10.1017/ssh.2019.5
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, J., and D. Laitin. 1996. “Explaining Interethnic Cooperation.” The American Political Science Review 90 (4): 715–735. doi:10.2307/2945838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2020. “Nations in Transit 2020: Estonia.” Freedom House website. Accessed 20 July 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/country/estonia/nations-transit/2020
   Google Scholar
• Galbreath, D. 2005. Nation-building and Minority Politics in Post-socialist States: Interests, Influence and Identities in Estonia and Latvia. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., D. Laibson, J. A. Scheinkman, and C. L. Soutter. 1999. “What Is Social Capital? The Determinants of Trust and Trustworthiness.” Working Paper 7216. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/glaeser/files/w7216.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grigas, A. 2013. The Politics of Energy and Memory between the Baltic States and Russia. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., and M. Setälä. 2007. “Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout.” Comparative European Politics 5 (4): 400–422. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110113.
   Google Scholar
• Hadarics, M. 2016. “Ideological Bases of Institutional Trust in Eastern and Western Europe and the Effect of Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Thought 9 (1): 24–40. doi:10.5964/psyct.v9i1.154.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 1991. “Trusting Persons, Trusting Institutions.” In The Strategy of Choice, edited by R. J. Zeckhauser, 185–209. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J., and J. A. Husser. 2012. “How Trust Matters: The Changing Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 312–325. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00548.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hloušek, V., L. Kopeček, J. Mlejnek, G. Dobos, A. Gyulai, A. Horváth, P. and Sula, et al. 2013. Presidents above Parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competencies and Informal Power. Brno: Masaryk University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, L. 2003. “Political Corruption in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Corruption in Contemporary Politics, edited by M. J. Bull and J. L. Newell, 193–206. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., S. Dassonneville, and S. Marien. 2014. “The Impact of Education on the Development of Political Trust: Results from a Five-Year Panel Study among Late Adolescents and Young Adults in Belgium.” Political Studies 63 (1): 124–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., and E. Quintelier. 2014. “Political Participation in European Countries: The Effect of Authoritarian Rule, Corruption, Lack of Good Governance and Economic Downturn.” Comparative European Politics 12 (2): 209–232. doi:10.1057/cep.2013.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., T. Reeskens, D. Stolle, and A. Trappers. 2009. “Ethnic Diversity and Generalized Trust in Europe: A Cross-National Multilevel Study.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (2): 198–223. doi:10.1177/0010414008325286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. 2012. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, M. L., and K. Johnson. 2011. “Capacity to Trust? Institutional Capacity, Conflict, and Political Trust in Africa, 2000–2005.” Journal of Peace Research 48 (6): 737–752. doi:10.1177/0022343311417981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1995. “Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions.” Party Politics 1 (4): 447–472. doi:10.1177/1354068895001004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H. D., D. Fuchs, and J. Zielonka. 2006. Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Köker, P. 2017. Presidential Activism and Veto Power in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Krupavičius, A. 2008. “Semi-Presidentialism in Lithuania: Origins, Development and Challenges.” In Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by R. Elgie and S. Moestrup, 65–84. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krupavičius, A. 2013. “Lithuania’s President: A Formal and Informal Power.” In Presidents above Parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe: Their Formal Competencies and Informal Power, edited by V. Hloušek, et al., 205–232. Brno: Masaryk University.
   Google Scholar
• Kumlin, S., and B. Rothstein. 2010. “Questioning the New Liberal Dilemma: Immigrants, Social Networks, and Institutional Fairness.” Comparative Politics 43 (1): 63–80. doi:10.5129/001041510X12911363510394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde, J. 2004. Doubting Democrats? A Comparative Analysis of Support for Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. PhD thesis, Örebro University.
   Google Scholar
• Listhaug, O. 1984. “Confidence in Institutions: Findings from the Norwegian Values Study.” Acta Sociologica 27 (2): 111–122. doi:10.1177/000169938402700202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lühiste, K. 2006. “Explaining Trust in Political Institutions: Some Illustrations from the Baltic States.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 39 (4): 475–496. doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2006.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuzato, K., and L. Gudžinskas. 2006. “An Eternally Unfinished Parliamentary Regime? Semipresidentialism as a Prism to View Lithuanian Politics.” Acta Slavica Iaponica 23: 146–170.
   Google Scholar
• Mauk, M. 2019. “Disentangling an Elusive Relationship: How Democratic Value Orientations Affect Political Trust in Different Regimes.” Political Science Quarterly 73 (2): 366–380.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, R. 2010. “Trust in Government among British Muslims: The Importance of Migration Status.” Political Behavior 38 (1): 89–109. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9093-1.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. 1997. “Trust, Distrust and Skepticism: Popular Evaluation of Civil and Political Institutions in Post-Communist Societies.” Journal of Politics 59 (2): 418–451. doi:10.1017/S0022381600053512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. 2001a. “Political Support for Incomplete Democracies: Realist Vs. Idealist Theories and Measures.” International Political Science Review 22 (4): 303–320. doi:10.1177/0192512101022004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., and R. Rose. 2001b. “What are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (1): 30–62. doi:10.1177/0010414001034001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norkus, Z. 2013. “Parliamentarism versus Semi-Presidentialism in the Baltic States: The Causes and Consequences of Differences in the Constitutional Framework.” Baltic Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 7–28. doi:10.15388/BJPS.2013.2.2813.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passarelli, G., ed. 2015. The Presidentialization of Political Parties: Organizations, Institutions and Leaders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pettai, V. 2001. “Estonia: Positive and Negative Institutional Engineering.” In Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe: Volume 1, Institutional Engineering, edited by J. Zielonka, 111–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettai, V., and K. Hallik. 2002. “Understanding Processes of Ethnic Control: Segmentation, Dependency and Co-Optation in Post-Communist Estonia.” Nations and Nationalism 8 (4): 505–529. doi:10.1111/1469-8219.00063.
   Google Scholar
• Pharr, S. J., and R. Putnam, eds. 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podolian, O. 2020. The Challenge of “Stateness” in Estonia and Ukraine. PhD thesis, Södertörns Högskola, Huddinge.
   Google Scholar
• Pop-Eleches, G., and J. Tucker. 2011. “Communism’s Shadow: Postcommunist Legacies, Values, and Behavior.” Comparative Politics 43 (4): 379–399. doi:10.5129/001041511796301588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., and T. Sedelius. 2019. “Shifting Power-Centres of Semi-Presidentialism: Exploring Executive Coordination in Lithuania.” Government and Opposition 54 (4): 637–660. doi:10.1017/gov.2017.31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., and T. Sedelius. 2020. Semi-Presidential Policy-Making in Europe: Executive Coordination and Political Leadership. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 1993–2004. New Baltic Barometer, 1–6. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde. Accessed 27 October 2020. http://www.cspp.strath.ac.uk/catalog2_0.html
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R., and W. Mishler. 1994. “Mass Reaction to Regime Change in Eastern Europe: Polarization or Leaders and Laggards?” British Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 159–182. doi:10.1017/S0007123400009777.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R., W. Mishler, and C. Harpfer. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, F. 2002. Risky Transactions. Trust, Kinship and Ethnicity. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, D., and M. S. Shugart. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schildkraut, D. J. 2005. “The Rise and Fall of Political Engagement among Latinos: The Role of Identity and Perceptions of Discrimination.” Political Behavior 27 (3): 285–312. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-4803-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, I. 2016. “Can We Trust Measures of Political Trust? Assessing Measurement Equivalence in Diverse Regime Types.” Social Indicators Research 133 (3): 963–984. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1400-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelius, T., and J. Linde. 2018. “Unravelling Semi-Presidentialism: Democracy and Government Performance in Four Distinct Regime Types.” Democratization 25 (1): 136–157. doi:10.1080/13510347.2017.1334643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelius, T., and O. Mashtaler. 2013. “Two Decades of Semi-Presidentialism: Issues of Intra-Executive Conflict in Central and Eastern Europe 1991-2011.” East European Politics 29 (2): 109–134. doi:10.1080/21599165.2012.748662.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, M. S., and J. M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siaroff, A. 2003. “Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi‐Presidential and Parliamentary Distinction.” European Journal of Political Research 42 (3): 287–312. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šlekys, D. 2018. “Defence Politics and Reshaping of the Lithuanian Semi-Presidential Regime.” Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Hamburg, 22–25 August.
   Google Scholar
• Sønderskov, K. M., and P. T. Dinesen. 2016. “Trusting the State, Trusting Each Other? The Effect of Institutional Trust on Social Trust.” Political Behavior 38 (1): 179–202. doi:10.1007/s11109-015-9322-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiftung, B. 2020. “Overview Estonia.” Bertelsmann Transformation Index 20 July 2020 https://www.bti-project.org/en/reports/country-dashboard-EST.html
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. 1962. “Popular Evaluations of Government: An Empirical Assessment.” In Ethics and Bigness: Scientific, Academic, Religious, Political, and Military, edited by H. Cleveland and H. D. Lasswell, 61–72. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Talat-Kelpša, L. 2001. “The Presidency and Democratic Consolidation in Lithuania.” Journal of Baltic Studies 32 (2): 156–169. doi:10.1080/01629770100000031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, M. 2009. Presidents with Prime Ministers: Do Direct Elections Matter? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T. D., K. Abts, K. Stroeken, and P. Vander Weyden. 2015. “Measuring Institutional Trust: Evidence from Guyana.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 7 (3): 85–115. doi:10.1177/1866802X1500700303.
   Google Scholar
• Toomla, R. 2013. “The Presidency in the Republic of Estonia.” In Presidents above Parties? Presidents in Central and Eastern Europe, Their Formal Competencies and Informal Power, edited by V. Hloušek, et al., 167–190. Brno: Masaryk University.
   Google Scholar
• Tracevskis, R. M. 2011. “Poland’s War against Lithuania over Education Law.” Baltic Times, 6 April. Accessed 29 June 2018. https://www.baltictimes.com/news/articles/28383/
   Google Scholar
• Ulram, P. A., and F. Plasser. 2003. “Political Culture in East-Central and Eastern Europe: Empirical Findings 1990–2001.” D. Pollack, J. Jacobs, O. Müller, and G. Pickel, Ashgate: Aldershot edited by. Political Culture in Post-Communist Europe: Attitudes in New Democracies, 31–46. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T. W. G. 2017. “Political Trust and the ‘Crisis of Democracy.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, edited by R. J. Dalton. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.77.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., R. Dalton, and D. Shin. 2006. “Political Trust, Political Performance and Support for Democracy.” In Citizens, Democracy and Markets around the Pacific Rim: Congruence Theory and Political Culture, edited by R. Dalton and D. Shin, 135–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weymouth, L. 2017. “Russia Is a Threat … to All of Europe.” Foreign Policy, 24 March. Accessed 29 June 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/03/24/russia-lithuania-nato-grybauskaite-putin-trump-interview/
   Google Scholar
• Wineroither, D., and G. Seeber. 2018. “Three Worlds of Representation: A Linkage-Based Typology of Parties in Western and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 32 (3): 493–517. doi:10.1177/0888325418756990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Values Survey (WVS). Accessed 29 June 2018 http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp
   Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S., and M. Hooghe. 2011. Political Trust: Why Context Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar