“The Poor Carer”: Ambivalent Social Construction of the Home Care Worker in Elder Care Services

References

• Baines, D., & Van Den Broek, D. (2016). Coercive care: Control and coercion in the restructured care workplace. British Journal of Social Work, 47, 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (2012). Care in everyday life: An ethic of care in practice. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, S., & Wibberley, G. (2014). Domiciliary care: The formal and informal labour process. Sociology, 48(4), 682–697. doi:10.1177/0038038513500098
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, P. (1997). Caring: Gender sensitive ethics. London, England and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brooking, J. (1989). A survey of current practices and opinions concerning patient and family participation in hospital care. In J. Wilson-Barnet & S. Robinson (Eds.), Directions in nursing research. (pp. 97-106). London, England: Scutari Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broom, A., Kirby, E., Kenny, K., McCartney, J., & Good, P. (2016). Moral ambivalence and informal care for the dying. The Sociological Review, 64, 987–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Care Alliance Ireland. (2012). Pre-budget submission 2013 to the Department for Social Protection. Dublin, Ireland: CAI.
   Google Scholar
• Care Alliance Ireland. (2014). Literature review on the relationship between family carers and home care support workers. Dublin, Ireland: CAI.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, D. (2014). Limitations of virtue ethics in the social professions. Ethics and Social Welfare, 8(1), 2–19. doi:10.1080/17496535.2013.804942
   Google Scholar
• Connidis, I., & McMullin, J. (2002). Ambivalence, family ties, and doing sociology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 594–601. doi:10.1111/jomf.2002.64.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Drake, P. (2007). Strategies for achieving best value in commissioned home care. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20(3), 206–225. doi:10.1108/09513550710740616
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2012). The national carers’ strategy: Recognised, supported, empowered. Dublin, Ireland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., & Timonen, V. (2010). The different faces of care work: Understanding the experiences of the multi-cultural care workforce. Ageing & Society, 29(3), 337–350. doi:10.1017/S0144686X08007708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustin, D. (2007). The McDonaldization of social work. Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet how single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. (2005, September 18). ‘The purchase of intimacy’: For love or money. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/18/books/review/the-purchase-of-intimacy-for-love-or-money.html
   Google Scholar
• Ertman, M. (2009). For both love and money: Viviana Zelizer’s the purchase of intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry, 34, 1017–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exley, C., & Allen, D. (2007). A critical examination of home care: End of life care as an illustrative case. Social Science & Medicine, 65(11), 2317–2327. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genet, N., Boerma, W., Kringos, D., Bouman, A., Francke, A., Fagerström, C., & Devillé, W. (2011). Home care in Europe: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 11(207), 11–14. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Webb, S. (2013). The new politics of social work. London, England: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutek, B. (1995). The Dynamics of Service. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Health Research Board. (2017). Approaches to the regulation and financing of home care services in four European countries, an evidence review. Dublin, Ireland: HRB.
   Google Scholar
• Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillcoat-Nallétamby, S., & Phillips, J. (2011). Sociological Ambivalence Revisited. Sociology, 45(2), 202–217. doi:10.1177/0038038510394018
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, R. (2013). She’s like a daughter to me: Insights into care, work and kinship from rural Russia. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(6), 1136–1153. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.778566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D. (2007). Rethinking the care-market: Relationship in care provider organisations. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 199–212. doi:10.1002/j.1839-4655.2007.tb00049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavalette, M. (2011). Radical social work today: Social work at the crossroads. Bristol,England: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. (2010). The individual in social care: The ethics of care and the ‘personalisation agenda’ in services for older people in England. Ethics and Social Welfare, 4(2), 188–200. doi:10.1080/17496535.2010.484262
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. (2012). Health and care in ageing societies: A new international approach. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lolich, L. (in press). The prioritisation of choice in elder care. International Journal of Care and Caring.
   Google Scholar
• Lolich, L., Riccò, I., Deusdad, B., & Timonen, V. (in press). Embracing technology? Health and social care professionals’ attitudes to the deployment of e-health initiatives in elder care services in Catalonia and Ireland. Technological Forecasting & Social Change.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, A., Lolich, L., Timonen, V., & Warters, A. (in press). “Time is more important than anything else”: Tensions of time in home care of older adults in Ireland. International Journal of Care and Caring.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, K. (2005). From ridicule to institutionalization: Anti-oppression, the state and social work. Critical Social Policy, 25(10), 283–305. doi:10.1177/0261018305054072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migrant Rights Centre Ireland. (2015). Migrant workers in the home care sector: Preparing for the elder boom in Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: MRCI.
   Google Scholar
• Mulkeen, M. (2016). Going to market! An exploration of markets in social care. Administration, 64(2), 35–59. doi:10.1515/admin-2016-0015
   Google Scholar
• National Economic and Social Council. (2012). Quality and standards in human services in Ireland: Home care for older people. Dublin, Ireland: NESC.
   Google Scholar
• Postle, K. (2002). Working ‘between the idea and the reality’: Ambiguities and tensions in care managers’ work. The British Journal of Social Work, 32(1), 335–351. doi:10.1093/bjsw/32.3.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubery, J., & Urwin, P. (2011). Bringing the employer back in: Why social care needs a standard employment relationship. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2), 122–137. doi:10.1111/hrmj.2011.21.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saultz, J., & Lochner, J. (2005). Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: A critical review. Annals of Family Medicine, 3(2), 159–166. doi:10.1370/afm.285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smelser, N. (1998). The rational and the ambivalent in the social sciences. American Sociological Review, 63(1), 1–16. doi:10.2307/2657473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, C. (2016). The caring self: The work experiences of home care aides. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, D. (2010). Managing the ageing experience: Learning from older people. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Timonen, V. (2009). Toward an integrative theory of care: Formal and informal intersections. In K. Roberto & J. Mancini (Eds.), Pathways of human development. Explorations of change (pp. 307–326). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Timonen, V., Conlon, C., & Foley, G. (2018). Challenges when using grounded theory: A pragmatic introduction to doing GT research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–10. doi:10.1177/1609406918758086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timonen, V., & Doyle. (2007). Worlds apart? Public, private and non-profit sector providers of domiciliary care for older persons in Ireland. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(3), 255–265. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timonen, V., Doyle, M., & O’Dwyer, C. (2012). Expanded, but not regulated: Ambiguity in home-care policy in Ireland. Health & Social Care in the Community, 20(3), 310–318. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01048.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, L., & Barnes, M. (2016). Transforming practice with older people through an ethic of care. British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 906–922. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. (2000). The purchase of intimacy. Law and Social Inquiry, 25(3), 817–848. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2000.tb00162.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar