“I’m Part of Something That Matters”: Exploring What Older Adults Value Through Their Engagement in Age-Friendly Community Initiatives

References

• AARP. (n.d). AARP Livable Communities Map. https://livablemap.aarp.org/#/view=map
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 11(4), 589–597. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021a). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021b). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffel, T. (2018). Social research and co-production with older people: Developing age-friendly communities. Journal of Aging Studies, 44, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2016). Can global cities be “age-friendly cities”? Urban development and ageing populations. Cities, 55, 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, C. N., Coyle, C. E., & Freeman, A. (2021). Promoting self-advocacy among older adults: Lessons from Boston’s senior civic academy. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 40(4), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820902628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Dabelko-Schoeny, H. I., White, K. M., & Choi, M.-S. (2020). Age-friendly communities and perceived disconnectedness: The role of built environment and social engagement. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(9), 937–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319865421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelloe, P., & Prokopy, J. (2001). Recruiting participants for community practice interventions: Merging community practice theory and social movement theory. Journal of Community Practice, 9(2), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v09n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. J. (2020). Age-friendly features in home and community and the self-reported health and functional limitation of older adults: The role of supportive environments. Journal of Urban Health, 97(4), 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00462-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M. S., Dabelko-Schoeny, H., & White, K. (2020). Access to employment, volunteer activities, and community events and perceptions of age-friendliness: The role of social connectedness. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(9), 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464819847588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colibaba, A., McCrillis, E., & Skinner, M. W. (2020). Exploring rural older adult perspectives on the scope, reach and sustainability of age-friendly programs. Journal of Aging Studies, 55, 100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design-qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A., & Lyu, Y. (2023). Making communities age-friendly: Lessons from implemented programs. Journal of Planning Literature, 39(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122231160796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges, C., Fung, A., Smith, W., Liang, J., Sum, J., & Gabbard, C. (2018). Longitudinal study of foster grandparent and senior companion programs: Service delivery implications and health benefits to the volunteers. North Bethesda, MD. https://www.americorps.gov/sites/default/files/evidenceexchange/Longitudinal_Study_of_Foster_Grandparent_and_Senior_Companion_Programs_FINAL_508_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, A. (2019). In what ways can an age-friendly approach to co-production transfer power to participants? Translating ideology into practice. Voluntary Sector Review, 10(3), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080519X15738068873573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, E. A., Oberlink, M., Scharlach, A. E., Neal, M. B., & Stafford, P. B. (2015). Age-friendly community initiatives: Conceptual issues and key questions. The Gerontologist, 55(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield, E. A., & Reyes, L. (2022). Characterising older adults’ engagement in age-friendly community initiatives: Perspectives from core group leaders in the Northeast United States of America. Ageing and Society, 42(6), 1465–1484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X2000166X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, A., Welch-Stockton, J., Kim, J. Y., Canham, S. L., Greer, V., & Sorweid, M. (2023). Age-friendly community interventions for health and social outcomes: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032554
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood, S., Lu, Y. Y. F., Jenkins, K., Brown, E. R., Beaven, J., Brown, S. A., Hendrie, H. C., & Austrom, M. G. (2018). Exploration of perceived psychosocial benefits of senior companion program participation among urban-dwelling, low-income older adult women volunteers. Innovation in Aging, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. H., & Kim, S. (2020). Development of age-friendly city indicators in South Korea: Focused on measurable indicators of physical environment. Urban Design International, 25(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00078-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H. (2017). Conceptualizing social connectivity in the context of age-friendly communities. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H., & Brown, C. (2022). Facilitators and barriers to becoming age-friendly: A review. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 34(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2018.1528116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menec, V. H., Means, R., Keating, N., Parkhurst, G., & Eales, J. (2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 30(3), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monachesi, P. (2023). Age friendly characteristics and sense of community of an Italian city: The case of Macerata. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5847. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105847
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrow-Howell, N. (2010). Volunteering in later life: Research frontiers. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(4), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novek, S., & Menec, V. H. (2014). Older adults’ perceptions of age-friendly communities in Canada: A photovoice study. Ageing and Society, 34(6), 1052–1072. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1200150X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parekh, R., Maleku, A., Fields, N., Adorno, G., Schuman, D., & Felderhoff, B. (2018). Pathways to age-friendly communities in diverse urban neighborhoods: Do social capital and social cohesion matter? Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61(5), 492–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1454564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9466-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redondo, N., & Gascón, S. (2016). The implementation of age-friendly cities in three districts of Argentina. Age-Friendly Cities and Communities in International Comparison: Political Lessons, Scientific Avenues, and Democratic Issues, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24031-2_9
   Google Scholar
• Rémillard-Boilard, S., Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2017). Involving older residents in age-friendly developments: From information to coproduction mechanisms. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 31(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2017.1309932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rémillard-Boilard, S., Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2021). Developing age-friendly cities and communities: Eleven case studies from around the world. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes, L. (2022). Experiences of civic participation among older African American and latinx immigrant adults in the context of an ageist and racist society. Research on Aging, 45(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275221094288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, E., Skinner, M. W., & Fowler, K. (2022). Emergent challenges and opportunities to sustaining age-friendly initiatives: Qualitative findings from a Canadian age-friendly funding program. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 34(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2019.1636595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D. (2018). Well-being with soul: Science in pursuit of human potential. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617699836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. M. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A. (2012). Creating aging-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing International, 37(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-011-9140-1
   Google Scholar
• Scharlach, A., & Lehning, A. (2015). Creating aging-friendly communities. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serrat, R., Chacur-Kiss, K., Villar, F., & Peiró-Milian, I. (2023). For the sake of myself, my colleagues and my community: Exploring the benefits of political participation in later life. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 66(7), 908–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2023.2191129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrat, R., Scharf, T., Villar, F., & Gómez, C. (2020). Fifty-five years of research into older people’s civic participation: Recent trends, future directions. The Gerontologist, 60(1), E38–E51. Gerontological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. J., Lehning, A. J., & Dunkle, R. E. (2013). Conceptualizing age-friendly community characteristics in a sample of urban elders: An exploratory factor analysis. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 56(2), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2012.739267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spina, J., & Menec, V. H. (2015). What community characteristics help or hinder rural communities in becoming age-friendly? Perspectives from a Canadian prairie province. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(4), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813496164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, M., & Nelson, S. C. (2015). Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data. Emerging Adulthood, 3(6), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815587648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, E. J., Georges, A., Gabbard, S. M., Pratt, D. J., Nerino, A., Roberts, A. S., Wrightsman, S. M., & Hyde, M. (2016). The 2013–2014 senior corps study: Foster grandparents and senior companions. Public Policy & Aging Report, 26(3), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppar/prw016
   Google Scholar
• Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Reflexive thematic analysis. In Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 430–441). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977159.00049
   Google Scholar
• Torku, A., Chan, A. P. C., & Yung, E. H. K. (2021). Age-friendly cities and communities: A review and future directions. Ageing and Society, 41(10), 2242–2279. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X20000239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2018). The global Network for age-friendly cities and communities: Looking back over the last decade, looking forward to the next. World Health Organization pp. 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2023). National programs for age-friendly cities and communities a guide. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240068698.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Community Health, 77. http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf
   Google Scholar