Does Monitoring Event Changes Improve Comprehension?

REFERENCES

• Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & White, M. J. (2011). Adults’ and children's monitoring of story events in the service of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 39, 992–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espin, C. A., & Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of three general outcome measures for predicting secondary student performance on content-area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62, 497–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Kruley, P., & Langston, W. E. (1994). Analogical processes in comprehension: Simulation of a mental model. In M. A.Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 609–640). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenggi, D., & Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Individual differences in reprocessing of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 182–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakala, C. M. (1999). Accessibility of spatial information in a situational model. Discourse Processes, 27, 261–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., White, M. J., & van den Broek, P. (2008). Children's inference generation across different media. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucera, J., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Age differences in the perception of hierarchical structure in events. Memory & Cognition, 39, 75–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2012). Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40, 812–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, W. H., & Klin, C. M. (2001). Tracking of spatial information in narratives. Memory & Cognition, 29, 327–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation. Cognitive Science, 35, 1489–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis, K., & Simon, S. (1994). Rereading scientific texts: Changes in resource allocation. In H.van Oostendorp & R. A.Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 115–133). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 292–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Hamm, D. N. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices-past, present, and future. In S. G.Paris & S. A.Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 13–69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Across the event horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 269–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). Event perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 608–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Federico, T., & Franklin, N. (1998). Retrieval from temporally organized situation models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1224–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Taylor, H. A. (2004). Interactive dimensions in the construction of mental representations for text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 988–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., van den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, A. S., & Bryk, S. W. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, S. S., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Not all narrative shifts function equally. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1257–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2006). What is wrong with anova and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse Processes, 41, 221–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Hambrick, D. Z., Zacks, R. T., Kurby, C. A., Bailey, H. R., … Beck, T. M. (2013). Event segmentation ability uniquely predicts event memory. Cognition, 129, 241–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer, N. K., & Zacks, J. M. (2005). Temporal changes as event boundaries: Processing and memory consequences of narrative time shifts. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 125–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundermeier, B. A., van den Broek, P., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Causal coherence and the availability of locations and objects during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 33, 462–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 236–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1997). Indexing events in memory: Evidence for index dominance. Memory, 5, 509–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therriault, D. J., Rinck, M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2006). Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 78–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Thomas, D., & Hazuka, T. (Eds.). (1992). Flash fiction. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H.Mandl, N. L.Stein, & T.Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation. Science, 328, 453–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T.McCrudden, J. P.Magliano, & G.Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K. E., Lynch, J. S., & Butler, J. (2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. G.Paris & S. A.Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 107–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (1999). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In B.Taylor, M.Graves, & P.van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., & Sargent, J. Q. (2010). Event perception: A theory and its application to clinical neuroscience. In B. H.Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 53, pp. 253–299). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 307–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., & Maley, C. J. (2010). The brain's cutting-room floor: Segmentation of narrative cinema. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Vettel, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2006). Event understanding and memory in healthy aging and dementia of the alzheimer type. Psychology and Aging, 21, 466–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacks, J. M., & Swallow, K. M. (2007). Event segmentation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 80–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1196–1207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 15–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995a). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995b). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension?Discourse Processes, 16, 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar