Transforming Selected Concepts Into Dimensions in Latent Semantic Analysis

REFERENCES

• Abdi, H. (2003). Factor rotations in factor analyses. In M.Lewis-Beck, A.Bryman, & T.Futing (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social sciences research methods (pp. 669–702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vega, M. (2005). Lenguaje, corporeidad y cerebro. Una revisión crítica. Revista Signos, 38, 157–176.
   Google Scholar
• de Vega, M., Glenberg, A., & Graesser, A. C. (2008). Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 391–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumais, S. T. (1991). Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 23, 229–236.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelopoulos, N. E. (2013). Latent semantic analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 683–692.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelopoulos, N., & Visinescu, L. (2012). Text-mining the voice of the people. Communications of the ACM, 55, 62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foltz, W., Gilliam, S., & Kendall, S. (2000). Supporting content-based feedback in on-line writing evaluation with LSA. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 111–128.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Penumatsa, P., Ventura, M., Cai, Z., & Hu, X. (2007). Using LSA in AutoTutor: Learning through mixed-initiative dialogue in natural language. In T. K.Landauer, D.McNamara, S.Dennis, & W.Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 243–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Cai, Z., Franceschetti, D., Penumatsa, P., Graesser, A. C., Louwerse, M. M., McNamara, D. S., & TRG. (2003). LSA: The first dimension and dimensional weighting. In R.Alterman & D.Hirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 587–592). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Cai, Z., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. (2007). Strengths, limitations, and extensions of LSA. In T. K.Landauer, D.McNamara, S.Dennis, & W.Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 401–426). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge-Botana, G., León, J. A., Olmos, R., & Escudero, I. (2010). Latent semantic analysis parameters for essay evaluation using small-scale corpora. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & Barroso, A. (2012). Gallito (version 2.0.1) [NLP Software]. Retrieved from http://www.elsemantico.es/descargas-eng.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, E., Steinhart, D., Stahl, G., & LSA Research Group. (2000). Developing summarization skills through the use of LSA-based feedback. Interactive Learning Environments, 8, 87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 257–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2007). Meaning in context. In T. K.Landauer, D.McNamara, S.Dennis, & W.Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 89–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kireyev, K., & Landauer, T. K. (2011, June). Word maturity: Computational modeling of word knowledge. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human language technologies-Volume 1 (pp. 299–308). Portland, OR: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaire, B., & Denhière, G. (2006). Effects of high-order co-occurrences on word semantic similarity. Current Psychology Letters, Behaviour, Brain, and Cognition, 18, 1.
   Google Scholar
• León, J. A., Olmos, R., Escudero, I., Cañas, J. J., & Salmerón, L. (2006). Assessing short summaries with human judgments procedure and latent semantic analysis in narrative and expository texts. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38, 616–627.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, M. M. (2007). Symbolic or embodied representations: A case for symbol interdependency. In T. K.Landauer, D.McNamara, S.Dennis, & W.Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 107–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. I., & Berry, M. W. (2007). Mathematical foundations behind latent semantic analysis. In T. K.Landauer, D.McNamara, S.Dennis, & W.Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 143–167). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational methods to extract meaning from text and advance theories of human cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I. B., & Millis, K. (2007). Evaluating self-explanations in iSTART: Comparing word-based and LSA algorithms. In T. K.Landauer, D.McNamara, S.Dennis, & W.Kintsch (Eds.), The handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 227–242). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nakov, P., Popova, A., & Mateev, P. (2001, September). Weight functions impact on LSA performance. In Proceedings of the EuroConference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP'01) (pp. 187–193). Tsigov Chark, Bulgaria: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAS) and The Bulgarian Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos, R., León, J. A., Jorge-Botana, G., & Escudero, I. (2009). New algorithms assessing short summaries in expository texts using latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 944–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., & Ruiz, M. A. (2009). Análisis de datos con SPSS 13. Madrid, Spain: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.L.
   Google Scholar
• Rehder, B., Schreiner, M. E., Wolfe, B. W., Laham, D., Landauer, T. K., & Kintsch, W. (1998). Using Latent Semantic Analysis to assess knowledge: Some technical considerations. Discourse Processes, 25, 337–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. M., Steeg, M., & Young, F. H. (1987). Linear algebra: A concrete introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. A. (1948). Mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, B. P., Dennis, S. J., & Kwantes, P. J. (2010). Comparing methods for single paragraph similarity analysis. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(1), 92–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar