Influence of the Historical Discourse Record on Language Processing in Dialogue

References

• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition: evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. (2008). Analyzing “visual world” eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 457–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring and comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 391–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2003). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 4.1.3) [computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1996). Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 22, 482–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 171–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S. (2012). Beyond common and privileged: Gradient representations of common ground in real-time language use. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 62–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 107, 1122–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Watching the eyes when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 592–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science, 32, 643–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Schmidt, S., Yoon, S. O., & Ryskin, R. A. (2015). People as contexts in conversation. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 62, 59–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1995). Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, P. E., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 554–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, P. E., Demiral, S. B., & Ferreira, F. (2011). Over-specified referring expressions impair comprehension: An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 77, 304–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gann, T. M. & Barr, D. (2012). Speaking from experience: Audience design as expert performance. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 744–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition, 27, 181–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, P. E. (1986). Eye movements. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 10.1–10.112). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 43–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96, 127–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, W. S., & Keysar, B. (1996). When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59, 91–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolicœur, P., Gluck, M. A., & Kosslyn, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. M., & Weinheimer, S. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation, and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 343–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockridge, C. B., & Brennan, S. E. (2002). Addressees’ needs influence speakers’ early syntactic choices. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 550–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory & Language, 49, 201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review, 77, 257–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. E. (1971). Where do sentences come from? In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 497–529). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2007). The art of conversation is coordination. Psychological Science, 18, 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71, 109–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460–471.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wege, M. M. (2009). Lexical entrainment and lexical differentiation in reference phrase choice. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 448–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2013). Lexical differentiation in language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar