Expectations on Hierarchical Scales of Discourse: Multifractality Predicts Both Short- and Long-Range Effects of Violating Gender Expectations in Text Reading

References

• Anderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 396–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I., & Van Orden, G. C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 133–167.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, H. E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1987). Comprehension processes and eye movement patterns in the reading of surprise-ending stories. Discourse Processes, 10, 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2008). From universal laws of cognition to specific cognitive models. Cognitive Science, 32, 36–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chhabra, A. B., & Jensen, R. V. (1989). Direct determination of the f(α) singularity spectrum. Physics Review Letters, 62, 1327–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. A., Holden, J. G., Mirman, D., & Stephen, D. G. (2012). Multifractal dynamics in the emergence of cognitive structure. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., & Keir, J. A. (2004). Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 32, 551–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilden, D. L., Thornton, T., & Mallon, M. W. (1995). 1/f noise in human cognition. Science, 267, 1837–1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, G. (2007). On the epigenetic evolution of species-specific perception: The developmental manifold concept. Cognitive Development, 17, 1287–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 371–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger, C. W. J., & Joyeux, R. (1980). An introduction to long-memory time series modeling and fractional differencing. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 1, 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeken, H., & van Vliet, M. (2000). Suspense, curiosity, and surprise: How discourse structure influences the affective and cognitive processing of a story. Poetics, 27, 277–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlen, E. A. F., & Vereijken, B. (2010). Interaction-dominant dynamics in human cognition: Beyond 1/fα fluctuation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 436–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. J. (1998). Self-organised criticality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition, 94, 113–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty-Stephen, D. G., & Dixon, J. A. (2014). Interwoven fluctuations during intermodal perception: Fractality in head sway supports the use of visual feedback in haptic perceptual judgments by manual wielding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40, 2289–2309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty-Stephen, D. G., & Mirman, D. (2013). Gaze fluctuations are not additively decomposable: Reply to Bogartz and Staub. Cognition, 126, 128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mandic, D. P., Chen, M., Gautama, T., Van Hulle, M. M., & Constantinides, A. (2008). On the characterization of the deterministic/stochastic and linear/nonlinear nature of the time series. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 464, 1141–1160.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (2008). On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: Analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation. Developmental Psychobiology, 50, 60–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, T., Kello, C. T., & Kerster, B. (2011). Distributional and temporal properties of eye movement trajectories in scene perception. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 178–183). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, S., Jürgenson, I. B., Hanulikova, A., Telkemeyer, S., Wartenburger, I., & Obrig, H. (2011). Implicit processing of phonotactic cues: Evidence from electrophysiological and vascular responses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1752–1764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schotter, E. R., Lee, M., Reiderman, M., & Rayner, K. (2015). The effect of contextual constraint on parafoveal processing in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 83, 118–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, T., & Schmitz, A. (1996). Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Physics Review Letters, 77, 635–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1969). Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128, 302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, D. G., Anastas, J. R., & Dixon, J. A. (2012). Scaling in executive control reflects multiplicative multifractal casade dynamics. Frontiers in Physiology, 3, 102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, D. G., Boncoddo, R. A., Magnuson, J. S., & Dixon, J. A. (2009). The dynamics of insight: Mathematical discovery as a phase transition. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1132–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M. D., & Van Orden, G. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, D., Wallot, S., & Kelty-Stephen, D. G. (2016). Single-word recognition need not depend on single-word features: Narrative coherence counteracts effects of single-word features that lexical decision emphasizes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9416-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turing, A. M. (1952). The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B237, 37–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tylén, K., Christensen, P., Roepstorff, A., Lund, T., Østergaard, S., & Donald, M. (2015). Brains striving for coherence: Long-term cumulative plot formation in the default mode network. NeuroImage, 121, 106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G., & Kloos, H. (2005). The question of phonology and reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 61–78). Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallot, S., Hollis, G., & van Rooij, M. (2013). Connected text reading and differences in text reading fluency in adult readers. PLoS ONE, 8, e71914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallot, S., O'Brien, B., Coey, C. A., & Kelty-Stephen, D. (2015). Power-law fluctuations in eye movements predict text comprehension during connected text reading. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2583–2588). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Wallot, S., O'Brien, B. A., Haussmann, A., Kloos, H., & Lyby, M. S. (2014). The role of reading time complexity and reading speed in text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 40, 1745–1765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S. C., Reader, W., & Payne, S. J. (2012). Adaptive browsing: Sensitivity to time pressure and task difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 386–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar