352
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What Makes Us More Egocentric in Communication? The Role of Referent Features and Individual Differences

&

References

  • Apperly, I. A., Back, E., Samson, D., & France, L. (2007). The cost of thinking about false beliefs: Evidence from adult performance on a non-inferential theory of mind task. Cognition, 106, 1093–1108.
  • Apperly, I. A., Carroll, D. J., Samson, D., Qureshi, A., Humphreys, G. W., & Moffatt, G. (2010). Why are there limits on theory of mind use? Evidence from adults' ability to follow instructions from an ignorant speaker. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1201–1217.
  • Apperly, I. A., Riggs, K. J., Simpson, A., Samson, D., & Chiavarino, C. (2006). Is belief reasoning automatic? Psychological Science, 17, 841–844.
  • Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265–292.
  • Bögels, S., Barr, D. J., Garrod, S., & Kessler, K. (2015). Conversational interaction in the scanner: mentalizing during language processing as revealed by MEG. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 3219–3234.
  • Brown-Schmidt, S. (2009). The role of executive function in perspective-taking during on-line language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 893–900.
  • Brown-Schmidt, S., & Hanna, J. E. (2011). Talking in another person's shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing. Dialog and Discourse, 2, 11–33.
  • Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Claxton, L. J. (2004). Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 299–319.
  • Ciechanowicz, A., & Stańczak, S. (2006). Test Uwagi i Spostrzegawczości. Warsaw, Poland: Polskie Towarzystwo Psychologiczne.
  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 9; pp. 313–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Clark, H. H., Schreuder, R., & Buttrick, S. (1983). Common ground and the understanding of demonstrative reference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 245–258.
  • Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.
  • Cohen, A. S., & German, T. C. (2009). Encoding of others' beliefs without overt instruction. Cognition, 111, 356–363.
  • Dumontheil, I., Kuster, O., Apperly, I. A., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2010). Taking perspective into account in a communication task. Neuroimage, 52, 1574–1583.
  • German, T., & Hehman, J. A. (2006). Representational and executive selection resources in “theory of mind”: Evidence from compromised belief-desire reasoning in old age. Cognition, 101, 129–152.
  • Gerstadt, C. L., Hong, Y. J., & Diamond, A. (1994). The relationship between cognition and action: Performance of children 31/2 − 7 years old on a Stroop-like day–night test. Cognition, 53, 129–153.
  • Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 262–268.
  • Hanna, J. E., & Brennan, S. E. (2007). Speakers' eye gaze disambiguates referring expressions early during face-to-face conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 596–616.
  • Hanna, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science, 28, 105–115.
  • Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 43–61.
  • Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Brauner, J. S. (2000). Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Sciences, 11, 32–38.
  • Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., Balin, J. A., & Peak, T. S. (1998). Definite reference and mutual knowledge: Process models of common ground in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1–20.
  • Keysar, B., Lin, S., & Barr, D. J. (2003). Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition, 89, 25–41.
  • Kuhlen, A. K., & Brennan, S. E. (2013). Language in dialogue: When confederates might be hazardous to your data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 54–72.
  • Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 551–556.
  • Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1–2), 8–13.
  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169.
  • Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 329–347.
  • Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Kathirgamanathan, U., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). Seeing it my way: A case of selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective. Brain, 128, 1102–1111.
  • Shintel, H., & Keysar, B. (2009). Less is more: A minimalist account of joint action in communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 260–273.
  • Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and perception (pp. 217–262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Wechsler, D. (1987). Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation.
  • Wilkes-Gibbs, D., & Clark, H. H. (1992). Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Cognition, 31, 183–194.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.