References
- Albrecht, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1998). Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases. Memory & Cognition, 26, 599–610.
- Ariel, N. (2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
- Brown-Schmidt, S., Byron, D. K., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Beyond salience: interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 292–313.
- Carrieras, M. (1997). Plural pronouns and the representation of their antecedents. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 53–87.
- Clifton, C., Jr., & Ferreira, F. (1987). Discourse structure and anaphora: Some experimental results. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance 12: The psychology of reading (pp. 635–654). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
- Çokal, D., Sturt, P., & Ferreira, F. (2014). This and That in Written Narrative Discourse. Discourse Processes, 51(3), 201–229.
- Çokal, D., Sturt, P., & Ferreira, F. (2016). The processing of it and this in written narrative discourse. Discourse Processes. Advance online publication.
- Cornish, F. (2008). How indexicals function in texts: Discourse, text, and one neo-Gricean account of indexical reference. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 997–1018.
- Filik, R., Leuthold, H., Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A. J. (2011). Anaphoric reference to quantified antecedents: An event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3786–3794.
- Garrod, S. C., Freudental, D., & Boyle, E. (1993). The role of different types of anaphor in the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 1–30.
- Koh, S., & Clifton, C.C. (2002). Resolution of antecedent of a plural pronoun: ontological categories and predicate symmetry. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 830–844.
- Moxey, L. M., & Sanford, A., J. (1993). Communicating quantities. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
- Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., & Dawydiak, E. J. (2001). The role of denial in negative quantifier focus. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 427–442.
- Moxey, L. M., Sanford, A. J., Sturt, P., & Morrow, L. I. (2004). Constraints on the formation of plural reference objects: the influence of role, conjunction, and type of description. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 346–364.
- Sanford, A., & Garrod, S. (1981). Understanding written language: Explorations in comprehension beyond the sentence. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Sanford, A., & Lockhart, F. (1990). Description types and methods of conjoining as factors influencing anaphora: A continuation study of focus. Journal of Semantics, 7, 365–378.
- Sanford, A. J., & Moxey, L. M. (1995). Notes on plural reference and the scenario-mapping principle in comprehension. In C. Habel & G. Rickheit (Eds.), Focus and cohesion in discourse processing (pp. 18–34). New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.