Readers’ Selective Recall of Source Features as a Function of Claim Discrepancy and Task Demands

References

• Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning & Instruction, 36, 86–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. (2017). The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 167–181. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Rouet, J.-F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 40(3), 450–465. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Salmerón, L., & Strømsø, H. I. (2016). Who said that? Investigating the plausibility-induced source focusing assumption with Norwegian undergraduate readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 253–262. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Andreassen, R. (2016). Sourcing in professional education: Do text factors make any difference? Reading and Writing: an Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(8), 1599–1628. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9611-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In M. J. Lawson & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), The quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and mental structures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) to be attained from others. In L. Bendixen & F. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163–194). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016). Commentary: Advances in research on sourcing-source credibility and reliable processes for producing knowledge claims. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1701–1717. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9675-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Pereyra, G., Britt, M. A., Braasch, J. L. G., & Rouet, J.-F. (2014). Reader’s memory for information sources in simple news stories: Effects of text and task features. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 187–204. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.879152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., Kalbfell, E., & Gerjets, P. (2016). Is this information source commercially biased? How contradictions between web pages stimulate the consideration of source information. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 430–456. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2016.1169968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefavrais, P. (1986). La pipe et le rat ou l’évaluation du savoir-lire du Cours Préparatoire à l’Enseignement Supérieur. Paris, France: EAP.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., & Redden, D. T. (2015). Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15, 38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Analyzing and integrating models of multiple text comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 143–147. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1328309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2015). Active audiences? The debate progresses but it is far from resolved. Communication Theory, 25(4), 439–446. doi:10.1111/comt.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (Volume II): Policies and practices for successful schools. PISA. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016b). Skills matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Towards a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2015). Americans’ internet access: 2000-2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., Favart, M., Britt, M. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 85–106. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1501_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., LeBigot, L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1549–1570. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9625-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Rouet, J.-F. (2016). Multiple viewpoints increase students’ attention to source features in social question and answer forum messages. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2404–2419. doi:10.1002/asi.2016.67.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saux, G., Britt, M. A., Burin, D. I., Irrazabal, N., & Rouet, J.-F. (2016). He did not say that: Students’ justifications in a source recognition task reflect their construction of document models. Poster presented at the 26th meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Kassel, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Saux, G., Britt, M. A., LeBigot, L., Vibert, N., Burin, D. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2017). Conflicting but close: Readers’ integration of information sources as a function of their disagreement. Memory and Cognition, 45(1), 151–167. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0644-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, J. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2011). Readers’ reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 230–247. doi:10.1037/a0021331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, U., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–Source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., Paul, J., Globoschütz, S., & Bromme, R. (2015). Watch out!- An instruction raising students’ epistemic vigilance augments their sourcing activities. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2278–2283). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., Scharrer, L., Skodzik, T., & Bromme, R. (2014). Comprehending multiple documents on scientific controversies: Effects of reading goals and signaling rhetorical relationships. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 93–116. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang Lund, E., Bråten, I., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2017). Memory for textual conflicts predicts sourcing when adolescents read multiple expository texts. Reading Psychology: An International Journal, 38(4), 417–437. doi:10.1080/02702711.2016.1278417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, B., Britt, M. A., Braasch, J. L. G., Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2014). Memory for scientific arguments and their sources: Claim-evidence consistency matters. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 117–142. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2013.855868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2014). Students’ sourcing while reading and writing from multiple documents. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9, 92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192–204. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomm, E., & Bromme, R. (2016). How source information shapes lay interpretations of science conflicts: Interplay between sourcing, conflict explanation, source evaluation, and claim evaluation. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1629–1652. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9638-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2002). WAIS – III. Escala de inteligencia para adultos de Wechsler (3rd ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar