Understanding How Language-Specific and Domain-General Resources Support Comprehension

References

• Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 50–68. doi:10.1037/a0014411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acheson, D. J., Wells, J. B., & MacDonald, M. C. (2008). New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 278–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M., & Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 68–82. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Jacovina, M. E., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Cohesive features of deep text comprehension processes. In J. Trueswell, A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, & D. Mirman (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the cognitive science society in Philadelphia, PA (pp. 2681–2686). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Snow, E. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Are you reading my mind? Modeling students’ reading comprehension skills with natural language processing techniques. In J. Baron, G. Lynch, N. Maziarz, P. Blikstein, A. Merceron, & G. Siemens (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international learning analytics & knowledge conference (LAK’15) (pp. 246–254). Poughkeepsie, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). AMOS (Version 7.0). Chicago, IL: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506–521. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, D., Whitney, P., & Turley, K. J. (1995). Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(6), 735–748. doi:10.3758/BF03200926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850-859. doi:10.3758/BF03196414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G. (2001). Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading. Memory, 9(4–6), 365–381. doi:10.1080/09658210143000083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo, M. G. (2005). Relative contribution of vocabulary knowledge and working memory span to elaborative inferences in reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(1), 53–65. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colzato, L. S., Spapé, M. M., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1051–1057. doi:10.3758/BF03193090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2), 163–183. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00096-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté, N., & Goldman, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., Snyder-Hogan, L. E., & Luciw-Dubas, U. A. (2010). Reading comprehension of scientific text: A domain-specific test of the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 687–700. doi:10.1037/a0019452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 264–274. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277–299. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, D. Y., & Wang, X. (2007). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 332–347. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Hannon, B. (2001). Using working memory theory to investigate the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension tests such as the SAT. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 208–223. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darowski, E. S., Helder, E., Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2008). Age-related differences in cognition: The role of distraction control. Neuropsychology, 22(5), 638–644. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley, M. J., & Elmore, P. B. (1992). The relationship of reading comprehension to critical thinking skills, cognitive ability, and vocabulary for a sample of underachieving college freshmen. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 921–931. doi:10.1177/0013164492052004014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rohde, D. (2006). The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 541–553. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher-Kiefer, R. (2001). Perceptual components of situation models. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 336-343. doi:10.3758/BF03194928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher-Kiefer, R., & D’Agostino, P. R. (2004). The role of visuospatial resources in generating predictive and bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 37(3), 205–224. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3703_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 373–389. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9079-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam, S., Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., Levinstein, I., & Boonthum, C. (2007). Assessing the format of the presentation of text in developing a reading strategy assessment tool (R-SAT). Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 199–204. doi:10.3758/BF03193148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). The generation of knowledge-based inferences during narrative comprehension. Advances in Psychology, 29, 53–94. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62732-6
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Franklin, S. P. (1990). QUEST: A cognitive model of question answering. Discourse Processes, 13(3), 279–303. doi:10.1080/01638539009544760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., McGough, K., Bennett, L., & Rice, M. E. (1996). Concept-oriented reading instruction: An integrated curriculum to develop motivations and strategies for reading. In L. Baker, P. Afflerbach, & D. Reinking (Eds.), Developing engaged readers in school and home communities (pp. 165–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definitions and empirical foundations. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice, 14, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3., pp. 207–219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & Van Den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. doi:10.3758/BF03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310–321. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., Britt, M. A., & Magliano, J. P. (2005). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology, 26, 335–362. doi:10.1080/02702710500285870
   Google Scholar
• Langston, M. C., Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1999). A connectionist model of narrative comprehension. In A. Ram & K. Moorman (Eds.), Understanding language understanding (pp. 181–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T. (2002). Predictive inference generation as a function of working memory capacity and causal text constraints. Discourse Processes, 34(3), 259–280. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & Van Den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 778–784. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Chong, J. L. (2001). Comprehension skill and global coherence: A paradoxical picture of poor comprehenders’ abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(6), 1424–1429. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1997). Individual differences in readers’ sentence-and text-level representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 129–145. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., Seely, M. R., Oppy, B. J., & Golding, J. M. (1996). The role of inferential processing in reading ability. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 189–214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35–54. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 56–98. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90003-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (Vol. levels 7/9 & 10/12; forms S&T). Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Larson, A. M., Higgs, K., & Loschky, L. C. (2016). The relative roles of visuospatial and linguistic working memory systems in generating inferences during visual narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 44(2), 207–219. doi:10.3758/s13421-015-0558-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., & Millis, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure and latent semantic analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 251–283. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., & Levinstein, I. . . (2011). Assessing comprehension during reading with the reading strategy assessment tool (RSAT). Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 131–154. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride-Chang, C., Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Custodio, R. G., & Doi, L. M. (1993). Print exposure as a predictor of word reading and reading comprehension in disabled and nondisabled readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 230–238. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(1), 82–91. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inferences during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K. L., Van Den Broek, P., Espin, C. A., White, M. J., Rapp, D. N., Kendeou, P., … Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 100–111. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38(1), 1–30. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., De Vega, M., & O’Reilly, T. (2007). Comprehension skill, inference making, and the role of knowledge. In F. Schmalhofer & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 233–251). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288. doi:10.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009a). Self-explanation and metacognition: The dynamics of reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 60–81). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. P. (2009b). Towards a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 297–384). New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., & Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(2), 147–171. doi:10.2190/1RU5-HDTJ-A5C8-JVWE
   Google Scholar
• McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 302–320. doi:10.1037/a0025250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medo, M. A., & Ryder, R. J. (1993). The effects of vocabulary instruction on readers’ ability to make causal connections. Literacy Research and Instruction, 33(2), 119–134. doi:10.1080/19388079309558149
   Google Scholar
• Millis, K., & Magliano, J. (2012). Assessing comprehension processes during reading. In J. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Reaching an understanding: Innovations in how we view reading assessment (pp. 35–53). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
   Google Scholar
• Millis, K., Magliano, J., & Todaro, S. (2006). Measuring discourse-level processes with verbal protocols and latent semantic analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 225–240. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz, B., Magliano, J. P., Sheridan, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2006). Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 211–216. doi:10.3758/BF03192771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 131–157. doi:10.1080/01638539809545042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The nation’s report card: 2015 mathematics and reading assessments (NCES Report No. 2015136). Washington, D. C.: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, S. J., Parsons, O. A., Schaeffer, K. W., & Hale, R. L. (1995). A methodological study of the Shipley institute of living scale in alcoholics and non-alcoholics: Reliability, discriminating items and alternate forms. Applied Neuropsychology, 2(3/4), 155. doi:10.1080/09084282.1995.9645354
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121–152. doi:10.1080/01638530709336895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., Süß, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31(2), 167–193. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00115-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, J. C., León, J. A., & Graesser, A. C. (2000). The psychology of the scientific text. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. New York, NY: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2010). Decoding, vocabulary, and comprehension. In M. G. McKeown & L. Kucan (Eds.), Bringing reading research to life (pp. 291–303). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 461–469. doi:10.1037/h0077013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Van Den Broek, P., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289–312. doi:10.1080/10888430701530417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. C. (1988). The effects of an elaborated directed activity on the metacomprehension skills of third graders. In J. E. Readence, R. S. Baldwin, & National Reading Conference (Eds.), Dialogues in Literacy Research (pp. 167–181). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. C. (1990). A questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, 43(7), 454–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (1988). Inferences in reading comprehension. In M. Daneman, G. E. Mackinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 6, pp. 177–219). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Andrusiak, P., Reisdorf, P., & Black, N. L. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 539–548. doi:10.3758/BF03199586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1993). Where does knowledge come from? Specific associations between print exposure and information acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 211. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402–433. doi:10.2307/747605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Redford, J. S. (2009). Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 85–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Todaro, S. A., Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., McNamara, D. S., & Kurby, C. A. (2008). Assessing the structure of verbal protocols. In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 607–612). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21(3), 255–287. doi:10.1080/01638539609544959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on‐line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 3–34. doi:10.1080/01638539309544827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498–505. doi:10.3758/BF03192720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension and memory of narrative texts: Inferences and coherence. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C. M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 123–139). Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, P., Lorch, R. F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. doi:10.3758/BF03206376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71–98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, B. P., Binns, M. A., & Anderson, N. D. (2017). Response time consistency is an indicator of executive control rather than global cognitive ability. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1–10. doi:10.1017/S1355617717001266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtue, S., Parrish, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2008). Inferences during story comprehension: Cortical recruitment affected by predictability of events and working memory capacity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(12), 2274–2284. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Was, C. A., Rawson, K. A., Bailey, H., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Content-embedded tasks beat complex span for predicting comprehension. Behavior Research Methods, 43(4), 910–915. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0112-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, P., Ritchie, B. G., & Clark, M. B. (1991). Working‐memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14(2), 133–145. doi:10.1080/01638539109544779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis‐Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 933–1002). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Zachary, R. A., & Shipley, W. C. (1986). Shipley institute of living scale: Revised manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00513.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar