Order of Mention in Causal Sequences: Talking about Cause and Effect in Narratives and Warning Signs

References

• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. B., & Bern, H. (1981). Causal coherence and memory for events in narratives. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20(3), 267–275.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K. (1987). Coordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 3, pp. 337–389). London, UK: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, J. K., & Warren, R. K. (1985). Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation. Cognition, 21, 47–67. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90023-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, W. F. (1985). The story schema: Universal and culture-specific properties. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briner, S., Virtue, S., & Kurby, C. (2012). Processing causality in narrative events: Temporal order matters. Discourse Processes, 49, 61–77. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.607952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & French, L. (1976). Construction and regeneration of logical sequences using causes or consequences as the point of departure. Child Development, 47, 930–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancygier, B. (1999). Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, H. (2001). The ordering distribution of main and adverbial clauses a typological study. Language, 77, 345–365. doi:10.1353/lan.2001.0152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, H., & Hetterle, K. (2011). Causal clauses: A cross-linguistic investigation of their structure, meaning, and use. In P. Siemund (Ed.), Linguistic Universals and Language Variation (pp. 21–52). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Enkvist, N. E. (1981). Experiential iconicism in text strategy. Text, 1, 97–111. doi:10.1515/text.1.1981.1.1.97
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S. (2010). Language production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews, 1, 834–844. doi:10.1002/wcs.70
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., & Slevc, L. R. (2007). Grammatical encoding. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 453–469). Oxford, UK: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischman, S. (1990). Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, S. Th. (2015). The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora, 10(1), 95–125. doi: 10.3366/cor.2015.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. J. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 213–241). New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Fox, R., & Jacewicz, E. (2012). The effects of concurrent cognitive load on phonological processing in adults who stutter. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55, 1862–1876. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0014)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23(2), 115–126.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033–295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott, A., Sanders, T. J. M., & Oberlander, J. (2001). Levels of representation in discourse relations. Cognitive linguistics, 12(3), 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., & Phelps, H. (1976). The development of children’s comprehension of causal direction. Child Development, 47, 248–251. doi:10.2307/1128307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, J. M. (1986). On the comprehension of temporal order. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 309–320. doi:10.1080/01690968608404680
   Google Scholar
• Moeschler, J. (2014). Causality and non-iconic order. In G. Gobber & A. Rocci (Eds.), Language, reason and education, Studies in honor of Eddo Rigotti. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Moeschler, J., Chevallier, C., Castelain, T., van der Henst, J.-B., & Tapiero, I. (2006). Le raisonnement causal: De la pragmatique du discours à la pragmatique expérimentale. Nouveaux cahiers de linguistique française, 27, 241–262.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., & Duffy, S. A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 453–465. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(87)90101-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordman, L. G. M. (2001). On the production of causal-contrastive ‘although’ sentences in context. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsuka, K., & Brewer, W. E. (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narrative texts. Discourse Processes, 15, 317–336. doi:10.1080/01638539209544815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinck, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Who when where: An experimental test of the event-indexing model. Memory and Cognition, 8, 1284–1292. doi:10.3758/BF03195811
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T., & Sweetser, E. (2009). Causal categories in discourse and cognition. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. J. M. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes, 24, 119–147. doi:10.1080/01638539709545009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. J. M. (2005). Coherence, causality and cognitive complexity in discourse. In M. Aurnague, M. Bras, A. Le Draoulec, & L. Vieu (Eds.), Proceedings/Acts SEM 05, First International Symposium on the exploration and modeling of meaning (pp. 105–114). Biarritz, France
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. J. M., & Noordman, L. G. M. (2000). The role of coherence relations and their linguistic markers in text processing. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 37–60. doi:10.1207/S15326950dp2901_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. J. M., & Spooren, W. (2009). The cognition of discourse coherence. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course (pp. 197–212). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. J. M., & Stukker, N. (2012). Causal connectives in discourse: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(2), 131–137. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2011.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Halldorson, J., Lear, J. C., & Andrusiak, P. C. (1992). Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 507–524. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90026-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooren, W., & Sanders, T. J. M. (2008). The acquisition order of coherence relations: On cognitive complexity in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(12), 2003–2026. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & van Den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612–630. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90049-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D. Balota, G. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–445). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B. W., Magliano, J. P., & Larsen, B. (2005). Causal and semantic relatedness in discourse understanding and representation. Discourse Processes, 39, 165–187. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, P. (2007). Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82–111. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar