Reasoning about alternative forms is costly: The processing of null and overt pronouns in Italian using pupillary responses

References

• Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S., Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2002). Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Rivista di linguistica, 14, 151–170.
   Google Scholar
• Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aronoff, M., & Rees-Miller, J. (2002). The handbook of linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. doi:10.1002/9780470756409
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276–292. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J., & Lucero-Wagoner, B. (2000). The pupillary system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 142–162). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belletti, A., & Guasti, M. T. (2015). The acquisition of Italian: Morphosyntax and its interfaces in different modes of acquisition. Amsterdam, the Netherlands/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/lald.57
   Google Scholar
• Blutner, R. (2000). Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics, 17(3), 189–216. doi:10.1093/jos/17.3.189
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, U., Van Maanen, L., Forstmann, B., & Van Rijn, H. (2014). Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution. Neuroimage, 96, 95–105. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carminati, M. N. (2002). The processing of Italian subject pronouns (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Hoop, H., & Kramer, I. (2006). Children’s optimal interpretations of indefinite subjects and objects. Language Acquisition, 13(2), 103–123. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1302_4
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt, P. E., Ferreira, F., & Patsenko, E. G. (2010). Pupillometry reveals processing load during spoken language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 639–645. doi:10.1080/17470210903469864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R. (1994). Italian false friends. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filiaci, F. (2010). Anaphoric Preferences of Null and Overt Subjects in Italian and Spanish: a Cross-linguistic Comparison (Doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 3–41). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/tsl.3
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Grosz, B. J., & Gilliom, L. A. (1993). Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science, 17(3), 311–347. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1703_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Language universals: With special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307. doi:10.2307/416535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., De Hoop, H., Kramer, I., De Swart, H., & Zwarts, J. (2010). Conflicts in Interpretation. London, UK: Equinox Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., & Spenader, J. (2006). When production precedes comprehension: An optimization approach to the acquisition of pronouns. Language Acquisition, 13(4), 319–348. doi:10.1207/s15327817la1304_3
   Google Scholar
• Horn, L. R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, Form and Use in Context (GURT ’84) (pp. 11–42). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., Tommola, J., & Alaja, A. M. (1995). Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(3), 598–612. doi:10.1080/14640749508401407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1993). The intensity dimension of thought: Pupillometric indices of sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(2), 310–339. doi:10.1037/h0078820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katidioti, I., Borst, J. P., & Taatgen, N. A. (2014). What happens when we switch tasks: Pupil dilation in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(4), 380–396. doi:10.1037/xap0000031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P. (1982). Word-formation and the lexicon. In F. Ingemann (Ed.), Proceedings of the Mid-America linguistics conference (pp. 3–29). Lawrence: University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Marsella, P., Scorpecci, A., Cartocci, G., Giannantonio, S., Maglione, A. G., Venuti, I., … Babiloni, F. (2017). EEG activity as an objective measure of cognitive load during effortful listening: A study on pediatric subjects with bilateral, asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 99, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. P. (2002). The index of cognitive activity: Measuring cognitive workload. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants. Scottsdale, AZ: IEEE. doi:10.1109/HFPP.2002.1042860
   Google Scholar
• McCawley, J. D. (1978). Conversational implicature and the lexicon. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics (pp. 245–259). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheepers, C., & Crocker, M. W. (2004). Constituent order priming from reading to listening: A visual-world study. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The On-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs, and beyond (pp. 167–186). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidtke, J. (2014). Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: Evidence from pupillometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 137. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serratrice, L. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence in the interpretation of anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns in English–Italian bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(3), 225–238. doi:10.1017/S1366728907003045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. doi:10.1191/0267658306sr271oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsimpli, I., Sorace, A., Heycock, C., & Filiaci, F. (2004). First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8(3), 257–277. doi:10.1177/13670069040080030601
   Google Scholar
• Van Rij, J. (2012). Pronoun processing: Computational, behavioral, and psychophysiological studies in children and adults (Doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rij, J., Hollebrandse, B., & Hendriks, P. (2016). Children’s eye gaze reveals their use of discourse context in object pronoun resolution. In A. Holler & K. Suckow (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on anaphora resolution (pp. 267–293). Berlin, Germany/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijn, H., Dalenberg, J. R., Borst, J. P., & Sprenger, S. A. (2012). Pupil dilation co-varies with memory strength of individual traces in a delayed response paired-associate task. PloS one, 7, 12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelzang, M., Hendriks, P., & Van Rijn, H. (2016). Pupillary responses reflect ambiguity resolution in pronoun processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(7), 876–885. doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1155718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierda, S. M., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N. A., & Martens, S. (2012). Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(22), 8456–8460. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201858109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press. doi:10.18637/jss.v016.b03
   Google Scholar
• Zellin, M., Pannekamp, A., Toepel, U., & Van der Meer, E. (2011). In the eye of the listener: Pupil dilation elucidates discourse processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 81(3), 133–141. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar