Resolving Figurative Expressions During Reading: The Role of Familiarity, Transparency, and Context

References

• Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 59. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Canal, P., Resta, D., & Grimaldi, M. (2019). Time course and neurophysiological underpinnings of metaphor in literary context. Discourse Processes, 56(1), 77–97. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2017.1401876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., & Weber, A. (2018). Context matters, figuratively, for L2 readers: Evidence from self-paced reading. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Mental Lexicon 2018, Edmonton, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Blasko, D., & Briihl, D. (1997). Reading and recall of metaphorical sentences: Effects of familiarity and context. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(4), 261–285. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1204_4
   Google Scholar
• Blasko, D., & Connine, C. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19(2), 295–308. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Stengers, H. (2007). Presenting figurative idioms with a touch of etymology: More than mere mnemonics? Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 43–62. doi:10.1177/1362168806072460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., & Glucksberg, S. (1991). Understanding idiomatic expressions: The contribution of word meanings. In G. Simpson (Ed.), Understanding word and sentence (pp. 217–240). North Holland, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Caillies, S., & Butcher, K. (2007). Processing of idiomatic expressions: Evidence for a new hybrid view. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 79–108. doi:10.1080/10926480709336754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardillo, E., Watson, C., Schmidt, G., Kranjec, A., & Chaterjee, A. (2012). From novel to familiar: Tuning the brain for metaphors. Neuroimage, 59(4), 3212–3221. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2014). Getting your wires crossed: Evidence for fast processing of L1 idioms in an L2. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(4), 784–797. doi:10.1017/S1366728913000795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2017). Cross language priming extends to formulaic units: Evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea “has legs”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 299–317. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2019). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech. first published online Jan 29th 2019. doi:10.1177/0023830918823230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., Conklin, K., & Gyllstad, H. (2016). Found in translation: The influence of L1 on the processing of idioms in L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 403–443. doi:10.1017/s0272263115000492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., Littlemore, J., & Dowens, M. G. (2018). Of false friends and familiar foes: Comparing native and non-native understanding of figurative phrases. Lingua, 204, 21–44. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffin, R., Morris, R., & Seely, R. (2001). Learning new word meanings from context: A study of eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 27(1), 225–235. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieślicka, A. B. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second Language Research, 22(2), 115–144. doi:10.1191/0267658306sr263oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieślicka, A. B. (2011). Suppression of literal meanings in L2 idiom processing: Does context help? Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 13–36. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, L. (1993). The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in context. In C. Cacciari & P. Tabossi (Eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation (pp. 163–200). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Columbus, G., Sheikh, N. A., Cote-Lecaldare, M., Hauser, K., Baum, S. R., & Titone, D. (2015). Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: An eye movement study of sentence reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1057. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolgunsöz, E. (2015). Measuring attention in second language reading using eye-tracking: The case of the noticing hypothesis. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(5), 4, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanari, R., Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (2010). The role of idiom length and context in spoken idiom comprehension. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(30), 321–334. doi:10.1080/09541440902843866
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, H., & Carrol, G. (2019). Contributions of semantic richness to the processing of idioms. The Mental Lexicon, 13(3), 311–332. doi:10.1075/ml.18014.fin
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/carbook
   Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25(6), 1366–1383. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.25.6.1366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Obtaining a figurative interpretation of a word: Support for underspecification. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3–4), 149–171. doi:10.1080/10926488.2001.9678893
   Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595–613. doi:10.1080/01690960601017013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. (1986). Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse Processes, 9(1), 17–30. doi:10.1080/01638538609544629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 576–593. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90014-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildea, P., & Glucksberg, S. (1983). On understanding metaphor: The role of context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(5), 577–590. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90355-9
   Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context and figurative language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godfroid, A., Boers, F., & Housen, A. (2013). An eye for words: Gauging the role of attention in incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition by means of eye tracking. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 483–517. doi:10.1017/S0272263113000119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2007/1991). The notion of “context” in language education. In J. Webster (Ed.), Language and Education (Volume 9 in the Collected Works of MA. A. K. Halliday, pp. 269–290). London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Hamblin, J., & Gibbs, R. (1999). Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 25–39. doi:10.1023/A:1023235403250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsinger, E. (2013). Representing idioms: Syntactic and contextual effects on idiom processing. Language and Speech, 56(3), 373–394. doi:10.1177/0023830913484899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhoff, A., Lima, S., & Carroll, P. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading. Memory and Cognition, 12(6), 558–567. doi:10.3758/BF03213344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, H., Wonnacott, E., Forbes, P., & Nation, K. (2014). Becoming a written word: Eye movements reveal order of acquisition effects following incidental exposure to new words during silent reading. Cognition, 133(1), 238–248. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N., Paivio, A., Marschark, M., & Clark, J. M. (1988). Norms for 204 literary and 260 nonliterary metaphors on 10 psychological dimensions. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 3(4), 191–214. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kecskés, I. (2006). On my mind: Thoughts about salience, context and figurative language from a second language perspective. Second Language Research, 22(2), 219–237. doi:10.1191/0267658306sr266ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1995). The effects of different tasks on the comprehension and production of idioms in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 261–283. doi:10.1006/jecp.1995.1041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levorato, M. C., & Cacciari, C. (1999). Idiom comprehension in children: Are the effects of semantic analysability and context separable? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 51–66. doi:10.1080/713752299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libben, M., & Titone, D. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liontas, J. (2002). Context and idiom understanding in second languages. In S. Foster-Cohen, T. Ruthenberg, & M.-L. Poschen (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook: Annual conference of the European second language association (Vol. 2, pp. 155–185). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lowell, R., & Morris, R. (2014). Word length effects on novel words: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(1), 179–189. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0556-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2006). Constraint satisfaction accounts of lexical and sentence comprehension. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 581–611). London, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mashal, N., & Faust, M. (2009). Conventionalization of novel metaphors: A shift in hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality, 14, 573–589. doi:10.1080/13576500902734645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone, M., Glucksberg, S., & Cacciari, C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167–190. doi:10.1080/01638539409544865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milburn, E., & Warren, T. (2019). Idioms show effects of meaning relatedness and dominance similar to those seen for ambiguous words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 591–598. doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01589-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2016). Incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition from and while reading: An eye-tracking study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(1), 97–130. doi:10.1017/S0272263115000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reuterskiöld, C., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2012). Retention of idioms following one-time exposure. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(2), 219–231. doi:10.1177/0265659012456859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweigert, W. (1986). The comprehension of familiar and less familiar idioms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 33–45. doi:10.1007/BF01067390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweigert, W. (1991). The muddy waters of idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20(4), 305–314. doi:10.1007/BF01074283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweigert, W., & Moates, D. (1988). Familiar idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17(4), 281–296. doi:10.1007/BF01067198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siyanova-Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2011). Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research, 27(2), 251–272. doi:10.1177/0267658310382068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, E., Rabanus, S., & Rösler, F. (2007). Processing verbs in German idioms: Evidence against the configuration hypothesis. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(3), 213–231. doi:10.1080/10926480701357638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenger, S., la Roi, A., & van Rij, J. (2019). The development of idiom knowledge across the lifespan. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 29. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2019.00029
   Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In M. G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 327–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swinney, D., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 18, 523–534. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
   Google Scholar
• Tabossi, P., Fanari, R., & Wolf, K. (2009). Why are idioms recognized fast? Memory and Cognition, 37(4), 529–540. doi:10.3758/MC.37.4.529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titone, D., & Connine, C. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1655–1674. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titone, D., & Libben, M. (2014). Time-dependent effects of decomposability, familiarity and literal plausibility on idiom meaning activation: A cross-modal priming investigation. The Mental Lexicon, 9(3), 473–496. doi:10.1075/ml.9.3.05tit
   Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R., & Morris, R. (2004). Eye movements, word familiarity, and vocabulary acquisition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 312–339. doi:10.1080/09541440340000196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, A., Bell, H., & Jones, K. (2016). How native and non-native speakers of English interpret unfamiliar formulaic sequences. European Journal of English Studies, 20(1), 47–63. doi:10.1080/13825577.2015.1136163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, H. (2017). Investigating Chinese EFL learners’ comprehension of English idioms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 329–336. doi:10.17507/jltr.0802.15
   Google Scholar
• Zuo, H. (2008). Comprehension of unfamiliar English idioms by Chinese EFL learners in reading. Journal of the Chinese English Language Association, 31(3), 9–29.
   Google Scholar