Exploring Reading Strategy Use in Native and L2 Readers

References

• Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The importance of metacognitive reading strategy awareness in reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235–244.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (Eds.). (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375–404. doi:10.3102/00346543058004375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhaqbani, A., & Riazi, M. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategy use in Arabic as a second language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 231–255.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L. K., Jacovina, M. E., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Cohesive features of deep text comprehension processes. Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 2681–2686). Philadelphia, PA: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Alsamadani, H. A. (2009). The relationship between Saudi EFL college-level students’ use of reading strategies and their EFL reading comprehension (Doctoral dissertation), Ohio University.
   Google Scholar
• Alsheikh, N. O., & Mokhtari, K. (2011). An examination of the metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460–472. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 strategy research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757–772). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., & Mullis, I. V. S. (1987). The nations’ report card: Learning to be literate in America: Reading. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., & Levey, T. (2006). New evidence on college remediation. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(5), 886–924. doi:10.1080/00221546.2006.11778948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, E. R., & Paxton, D. (1997). “It’s not the English thing”: Bringing reading research into the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 237–261. doi:10.2307/3588046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. A. (1988). Reading through context: How real and perceived strategy use affects L2 comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 72(2), 150–162. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. (2003). Challenges to reading research from a multilingual world. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 112–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). A psycholinguistic perspective on second language literacy. Aila Review, 8(1), 31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14(1), 14–31. doi:10.1080/10904018.2000.10499033
   Google Scholar
• Bostian, B. (2017). Placement of international English language learners: How different is it? International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education, 2, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C., & Endris, A. K. (2012). Navigating “open access” community colleges. In Y. Kanno & L. Harklau’s (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access and persistence (pp. 165–183). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. Tesol Quarterly, 23(4), 647–678. doi:10.2307/3587536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (2006). Effects of topic familiarity and linguistic difficulty on the reading strategies and mental representations of nonnative readers of Chinese. Journal of Language and Learning, 4(2), 172–198.
   Google Scholar
• Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2005). Linguistic distance: A quantitative measure of the distance between English and other languages. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 26(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/14790710508668395
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. A. (1979). Reading in Spanish and English: Evidence from adult ESL students. Language Learning, 29(1), 121–150. doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01055.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7(3), 249–253. doi:10.1177/014662168300700301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J., & Azevedo, R. (2011). Measuring strategy use in context with multiple-choice items. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 155–177. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9070-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Self-report of reading comprehension strategies: What are we measuring? Metacognition and Learning, 1(3), 229–247. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-9002-5
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. doi:10.3102/00346543049002222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gennaro, K. (2008). Assessment of generation 1.5 learners for placement into college writing courses. Journal of Basic Writing, 27(1), 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. L. Oxford’s (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 61–74). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. doi:10.1177/1529100612453266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1998). How to study thinking in everyday life: Contrasting think-aloud protocols with descriptions and explanations of thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 178–186. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0503_3
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D., Brown, J., Liu, H. S., & Stine, M. E. A. (2011). Responding to L2 students in college writing classes: Teacher perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 207–234. doi:10.5054/tq.2011.247706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English-as-a-second-language learners’ cognitive reading processes: A review of research in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 65(2), 145–190. doi:10.3102/00346543065002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, G. E. (1991). Factors influencing the English reading test performance of Spanish-speaking Hispanic children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 371–392. doi:10.2307/747894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghahari, S., & Basanjideh, M. (2017). Psycho-linguistic model of reading strategies awareness in EFL contexts. Reading Psychology, 38(2), 125–153. doi:10.1080/02702711.2016.1224784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavamnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2013). L2 reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners: A think-aloud study. Reading Psychology, 34(4), 355–378. doi:10.1080/02702711.2011.640097
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow’s (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L. (2018). Modeling the relationship of metacognitive knowledge, L1 reading ability, L2 language proficiency and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 30(2), 209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harklau, L. (2000). From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 35–67. doi:10.2307/3588096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, K., Magliano, J. P., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Bridging skill and task-oriented reading. Discourse Processes, 54(1), 19–39. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1100572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiba, Y. (1990). Narrative comprehension processes: A study of native and non-native readers of Japanese. Modern Language Journal. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb02566.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiba, Y. (1996). Comprehension processes in L2 reading: Language competence, textual coherence, and inferences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 433–473. doi:10.1017/S0272263100015370
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H. C., Chern, C. L., & Lin, C. C. (2009). EFL learners’ use of online reading strategies and comprehension of texts: An exploratory study. Computers & Education, 52(1), 13–26. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwai, Y. (2009). Metacognitive awareness and strategy use in academic English reading among adult English as a second language (ESL) students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/1036
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 67–97. doi:10.3102/00028312032001067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: Opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1), 90–112. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karbalaei, A. (2010). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, M. N. (2018). Prior topical knowledge and L2 proficiency as determinants of strategic processing in English for academic purposes multi-texts comprehension. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 235–246. doi:10.1080/17501229.2016.1177058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, M. N., & Shabani, M. B. (2013). Comparing the strategic behavior of more successful vs. less successful readers of multiple technical reading texts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 125–138. doi:10.1080/17501229.2012.726223
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kletzien, S. B. (1991). Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 67–86. doi:10.2307/747732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopatich, R. D., Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., Parker, C. P., & Ray, M. (2019). Understanding how language-specific and domain-general resources support comprehension. Discourse Processes, 56(7), 530–552. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2018.1519358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension?. In H. Béjoint & P. Arnaud (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Maasum, T. N. R. T. M., & Maarof, N. (2012). Empowering ESL readers with metacognitive reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1250–1258. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.058
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Durik, A. M., & Holt, J. K. (2011). Assessing the impact of topic interest on comprehension processes (LSAC Research Report 11–02). DeKalb, IL: Law School Admission Council.
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (2012). Computer-based assessment of student-constructed responses. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 608–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., & Millis, K. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure and latent semantic analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 21(3), 251–283. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2103_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., Levinstein, I., & Boonthum, C. (2011). Assessing comprehension during reading with the reading strategy assessment tool (RSAT). Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 131–154. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9064-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Trabasso, T., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Millis, K. K., The RSAT Development Team, Levinstein, I., & Boonthum, C. (2011). Assessing comprehension during reading with the reading strategy assessment tool (RSAT). Metacognition and Learning, 6(2),131–154.
   Google Scholar
• Maloy, J. (2016). A tale of two placements: Influences of ESL designation on the identities of two linguistic minority community college students. NYS TESOL Journal, 3(1), 23. Retrieved from http://journal.nystesol.org/january2016/NYSTESOLJ-jan2016-23-34.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Masson, M. E. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 679–690. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I. B., & Millis, K. (2007). Evaluating self-explanations in iSTART: Comparing word-based and LSA algorithms. Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis, 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). Coh-metrix: Automated cohesion and coherence scores to predict text readability and facilitate comprehension. (Technical Report). Memphis, TN: Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297–384. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11(2), 323–348.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2004). Investigating the strategic reading processes of first and second language readers in two different cultural contexts. System, 32(3), 379–394. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Jamil, T., & Morey, M. R. D. (2015). Package ‘BayesFactor’. Retrieved from http://cran. r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/BayesFactor. pdf).
   Google Scholar
• Madhumathi, P., & Ghosh, A. (2012). Awareness of reading strategy use of Indian ESL students and the relationship with reading comprehension achievement. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Campbell, J. R., & Farstrup, A. E. (1993). NAEP 1992 reading report card for the nation and the states. (Report #23-ST06). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, B., Magliano, J. P., Sheridan, R., & McNamara, D. S. (2006). Typing versus thinking aloud when reading: Implications for computer-based assessment and training tools. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 211–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., Sabatini, J., Bruce, K., Pillarisetti, S., & McCormick, C. (2012). Middle school reading assessment: Measuring what matters under an RTI framework. Reading Psychology Special Issue: Response to Intervention, 33(1–2), 162–189. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.631865
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239–1252. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1993). Why inferences might be restricted. Discourse Processes, 16(1–2), 181–192. doi:10.1080/01638539309544836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 993–1038. doi:10.1111/lang.2011.61.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rastegar, M., Kermani, E. M., & Khabir, M. (2017). The relationship between metacognitive reading strategies use and reading comprehension achievement of EFL learners. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 7, 1. doi:10.4236/ojml.2017.72006
   Google Scholar
• Ray, M., & Magliano, J. P. (2015, October). Can moment-to-moment comprehension measures inform the assessment of community college students’ readiness for college reading? Presented at the 13th annual Focus on Illinois education research symposium of the Illinois education research council, Lisle, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes factors for ANOVA designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5), 356–374. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., Bruce, K., & Steinberg, J. (2013). SARA reading components tests, RISE form: Test design and technical adequacy. ETS Research Report Series, 2013(1), i–25. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2013.tb02315.x
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J., Bruce, K., Steinberg, J., & Weeks, J. (2015). SARA reading components tests, RISE forms: Technical adequacy and test design. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(2), 1–20. doi:10.1002/ets2.12076
   Google Scholar
• Senay Sen, H. (2009). The relationship between the use of metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 2301–2305. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.404
   Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Andruslak, P., Reisdorf, P., & Black, N. L. (1992). Individual differences in bridging inference processes. Memory & Cognition, 20(5), 539–548. doi:10.3758/BF03199586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1–38. doi:10.3758/BF03199586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, H. (2014). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategy awareness in reading comprehension: The case of Iranian university EFL students. Reading, 14(2), 314–336.
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21(3), 255–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y.-R., Ernst, C., & Talley, P. C. (2010). L1 and L2 strategy use in reading comprehension of Chinese EFL readers. Reading Psychology, 31(1), 1–29. doi:10.1080/02702710802412081
   Google Scholar
• Upton, T. A. (1997). First and second language use in reading comprehension strategies of Japanese ESL students. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal, 3(1). Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org/ej09/a3.html
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension (pp. 11–12). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 6(2), 205–211. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Prins, F. J., & Elshout, J. J. (2002). Initial inductive learning in a complex computer simulated environment: The role of metacognitive skills and intellectual ability. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(3), 327–341. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00038-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, P., Ritchie, B. G., & Clark, M. B. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14(2), 133–145. doi:10.1080/01638539109544779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherell, S., and Clayton, E. (2014, November 17). “Open doors 2014: International students in the United States and study abroad by American students are at all-time high.” Institute of International Education News Release. Retrieved from http://www.iie.org/Who-WeAre/News-and-Events/Press-Center/Press-Releases/2014/2014-11-17-Open-DoorsData
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita, J. (2002). Mutual compensation between L1 reading ability and L2 language proficiency in L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(1), 81–95. doi:10.1111/jrir.2002.25.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Brown, C. M. (1996). The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation model construction. Discourse Processes, 21(3), 289–327. doi:10.1080/01638539609544960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 386–397. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar