References
- Alexopoulou, T., & Kolliakou, D. (2002). On linkhood, topicalization and clitic left dislocation. Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 193–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226702001445
- Ariel, M. (2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schilperoord, & W. Spooren (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 29–87). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.8.04ari
- Arregi, K. (2014). Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. In S. Arunachalam, U. Horesh, E. Kaiser, I. Ross, T. Sánchez, & A. Williams (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th annual penn linguistics colloquium (pp. 1–14). Penn Linguistics Club.
- Asher, N. (2000). Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphora. In J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, & A. C. Varzi (Eds.), Speaking of events (pp. 123–150). Oxford University Press.
- Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (1998). Bridging. Journal of Semantics, 15(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/15.1.83
- Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge University Press.
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Birner, B. J., & Ward, G. (1998). Information status and noncanonical word order in English. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.40
- Bott, S. M. (2007). Information structure and discourse modelling [ Doctoral thesis]. Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10803/7573
- Brunetti, L. (2006). Italian background: Links, tails, and contrast effects. In B. Gyuris (Ed.), Proceedings of the ninth symposium on logic and language (pp. 45–52). Eötvös Loránd University.
- Brunetti, L. (2009a). On links and tails in Italian. Lingua, 119(5), 756–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.005
- Brunetti, L. (2009b). On the semantic and contextual factors that determine topic selection in Italian and Spanish. The Linguistic Review, 26(2–3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2009.010
- Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.04.005
- Callahan, S. M. (2008). Processing anaphoric constructions: Insights from electrophysiological studies. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(3), 231–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.10.002
- Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). Academic Press.
- Clark, H. H. (1975). Bridging. In B. L. Nash-Webber & R. Schank (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1975 workshop on theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 169–174). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/980190.980237
- Clark, H. H. (1977). Inferences in comprehension. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 243–263). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Daneš, F. (Ed.). (1974). Papers on functional sentence perspective. Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111676524
- De la Fuente, I., Hemforth, B., Colonna, S., & Schimke, S. (2016). The role of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in pronoun resolution: A cross-linguistic overview. In A. Holler & K. Suckow (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on anaphora resolution (pp. 11–31). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110464108-003
- Drummond, A. (2013). IbexFarm (Version 0.3.9) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://spellout.net/ibexfarm/
- Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge University Press.
- Forcadell, M. (2016). New prosodic patterns in Catalan: Information status and (de)accentability. Journal of Pragmatics, 97, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.03.007
- Gardent, C., Manuélian, H., & Kow, E. (2003). Which bridges for bridging definite descriptions? In A. Abeillé, S. Hansen-Schirra, & H. Uzskoreit (Eds.), Proceedings of 4th international workshop on linguistically interpreted corpora (pp. 69–76). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W03-2410
- Gertken, L. M., Amengual, M., & Birdsong, D. (2014). Assessing language dominance with the Bilingual language profile. In P. Leclercq, A. Edmonds, & H. Hilton (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency (pp. 208–225). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092291-014
- Geurts, B. (2011). Accessibility and anaphora. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, & P. Portner (Eds.), Semantics. An international handbook of natural language meaning (Vol. 2, pp. 1988–2011). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255072.1988
- Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: Introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 5–41). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.3
- Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
- Grosz, B. J., & Ziv, Y. (1998). Centering, global focus, and right dislocation. In M. Walker, A. Joshi, & E. Prince (Eds.), Centering theory in discourse (pp. 293–307). Clarendon Press.
- Haviland, S. E., & Clark, H. H. (1974). What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 512–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4
- Hendriks, H. (1996). Information packaging: From cards to boxes. In T. Galloway & J. Spence (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th semantics and linguistic theory conference (pp. 75–92). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v0i0.2765
- Hendriks, H., & Dekker, P. (1995). Links without locations. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 339–358). University of Amsterdam.
- Huang, Y. (2000). Discourse anaphora: Four theoretical models. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00041-7
- Irmer, M. (2011). Bridging inferences: Constraining and resolving underspecification in discourse interpretation. De Gruyter.
- Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2008). Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(5), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701771220
- Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. CSLI Publications.
- Kleiber, G. (2001). L’anaphore associative. Presses Universitaires de France.
- Lambrecht, K. (1996). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge University Press.
- López, L. (2009). A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001
- Manetta, E. (2007). Unexpected left dislocation: An English corpus study. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(5), 1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.01.003
- Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
- Matsui, T. (1998). Pragmatic criteria for reference assignment: A Relevance-theoretic account of the acceptability of bridging. Pragmatics & Cognition, 6(1–2), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.6.1-2.06mat
- Matsui, T. (2000). Bridging and relevance. John Benjamins.
- Mayol, L. (2007). Right-dislocation in Catalan: Its discourse function and counterparts in English. Languages in Contrast, 7(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.7.2.07may
- Mayol, L., & Villalba, X. (2018). Bridging and dislocation in Catalan. In L. Repetti & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 14. Selected papers from the 46th linguistics symposium on romance languages (pp. 201–213). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.14.11may
- Mitkov, R. (2012). Anaphora resolution. In R. Mitkov (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational linguistics (pp. 266–283). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0014
- Partee, B. H., Ter Meulen, A., & Wall, R. E. (1987). Mathematical methods in linguistics. Springer.
- Poesio, M. (2016). Linguistic and cognitive evidence about anaphora. In M. Poesio, R. Stuckardt, & Y. Versley (Eds.), Anaphora resolution. Algorithms, resources and applications (pp. 23–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47909-4-2
- Prince, E. F. (1998). On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In P. Culicover & L. McNally (Eds.), The limits of syntax (pp. 281–302). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004373167-011
- R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
- Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315536965
- Schwarz-Friesel, M. (2007). Indirect anaphora in text. In M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten, & M. Knees (Eds.), Anaphors in text: Cognitive, formal and applied approaches to anaphoric reference (pp. 3–20). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.86.04sch
- Singer, M. (2012). Inference processing in discourse comprehension. In M. G. Gaskell, G. Altmann, & P. Bloom (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 343–359). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0020
- Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0001
- Tomioka, S. (2010). Contrastive topics operate on speech acts. In M. Zimmermann & C. Féry (Eds.), Information structure: Theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives (pp. 115–138). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0006
- Umbach, C. (2003). Anaphoric restriction of alternative sets: On the role of bridging antecedents. In M. Weisgerber (Ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7 (pp. 310–323). Universität Konstanz.
- Vallduví, E. (1992). The informational component. Garland.
- Vasishth, S., & Broe, M. (2011). Bivariate statistics and linear models. In S. Vasishth & M. Broe (Eds.), The foundations of statistics: A simulation-based approach (pp. 127–143). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16313-5-6
- Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2013). Modern applied statistics with S. Springer.
- Villalba, X. (2000). The syntax of sentence periphery [ Doctoral thesis]. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10803/4838
- Villalba, X., & Mayol, L. (2013). Right-dislocation in Catalan: Tails, polarity and activation. International Review of Pragmatics, 5(1), 87–117. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-13050104
- Ward, G., & Birner, B. J. (2008a). Discourse and information structure. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 119–137). Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch7
- Ward, G., & Birner, B. J. (2008b). Information structure and non-canonical syntax. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 152–174). Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756959.ch7
- Ward, G., & Prince, E. F. (1991). On the topicalization of indefinite NPs. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(91)90079-D
- Webber, B., Joshi, A., Stone, M., & Knott, A. (2003). Anaphora and discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 29(4), 545–587. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120103322753347
- Ziv, Y. (1994). Left and right dislocations: Discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics, 22(6), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90033-7