References
- Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001
- Barbaresi, A. (2014). Language-classified open subtitles (LACLOS): Download, extraction, and quality assessment (Technical Report). Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. https://www.dwds.de/dwds_static/publications/pdf/Barbaresi_2014b_OpenSubtitles-techreport.pdf
- Barbaresi, A., & Würzner, K.-M. (2014). For a fistful of blogs: Discovery and comparative benchmarking of republishable German content. In KONVENS 2014, NLP4CMC workshop proceedings (pp. 2–10). Hildesheim: Hildesheim University Press. www.dwds.de/static/publications/pdf/Barbaresi-Wuerzner_Fistful-of-blogs_2014.pdf
- Barbour, S., & Stevenson, P. (1990). Variation in German: A critical approach to German sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.
- Bates, D. M., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. ArXiv E-Prints, (v2). Retrieved May 26, 2018, from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150604967B
- Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Bayley, R., Cameron, R., & Lucas, C. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
- Boland, J. E., Kaan, E., Valdés Kroff, J., & Wulff, S. (2016). Psycholinguistics and variation in language processing. Linguistics Vanguard, 2(s1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0064
- Brehm, L., Jackson, C. N., & Miller, K. L. (2019). Speaker-specific processing of anomalous utterances. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 764–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818765547
- Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., & Huettig, F. (2010). Shadowing reduced speech and alignment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), EL32–6. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3448022
- Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2008). Language and aging. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed., pp. 373–443). Psychology Press.
- Buson, L., Nardy, A., Muller, D., & Chevrot, J.-P. (2018). The sociolinguistic repetition task: A new paradigm for exploring the cognitive coherence of language varieties. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 803–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12380
- Clark, J. G. (1981). Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA: A Journal of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 23(7), 493–500.
- Coupland, C., & Kristiansen, T. (2011). SLICE: Critical perspective on language (de)standardization. In T. Kristiansen & C. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 11–35). Novus Press.
- Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening: Language experience and the recognition of spoken words. MIT Press.
- Davies, W., & Langer, N. (2006). The making of bad language. Lay linguistic stigmatisations in German: Past and present. Peter Lang.
- De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T. (2008). Praat script syllable nuclei v2. https://sites.google.com/site/speechrate/Home/praat-script-syllable-nuclei-v2
- Deppermann, A., Kleiner, S., & Knöbl, R. (2013). ‘Standard usage’: Towards a realistic conception of spoken standard German. In P. Auer, J. Caro Reina, & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Language variation – European perspectives IV (pp. 83–116). Benjamins.
- Di Meola, C. (2000). Die Grammatikalisierung deutscher Präpositionen [The grammaticalization of German prepositions]. Stauffenburg.
- Dovalil, V. (2006). Sprachnormenwandel im geschriebenen Deutsch an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert: Die Entwicklung in ausgesuchten Bereichen der Grammatik [Changing language norms of written German at the turn to the 21st century: The development of selected domains of grammar]. Lang.
- Drager, K. (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00210.x
- Duden. (2016). Duden. Die Grammatik [Duden. The grammar].
- Dürscheid, C. (2011). Zweifeln als Chance? Zweifeln als Problem? Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle im Deutschunterricht [Doubting as an opportunity? Doubting as a problem? Linguistic doubts in teaching of German]. In K.-M. Köpke & A. Ziegler (Eds.), Grammatik - Lehren, Lernen, Verstehen: Zugänge zur Grammatik des Gegenwartsdeutschen (pp. 155–173). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-49258
- Dürscheid, C., Elspaß, S., & Ziegler, A. (2019). “Variantengrammatik des Standarddeutschen” – Das neue Online-Nachschlagewerk zur arealen Variation in der Grammatik des Deutschen [“Variant grammar of standard German” – The new online reference work on areal variation in German grammar]. In L. M. Eichinger & A. Plewnia (Eds.), Neues vom heutigen Deutsch. Empirisch – Methodisch – Theoretisch (pp. 331–334). De Gruyter.
- DWDS – Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. (2018a). Das Wortauskunftssystem zur deutschen Sprache in Geschichte und Gegenwart, hrsg. v. d. Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Blogs. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://www.dwds.de/r
- DWDS – Digitales Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. (2018b). Das Wortauskunftssystem zur deutschen Sprache in Geschichte und Gegenwart, hrsg. v. d. Berlin-Brandenburgischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Filmuntertitel [Movie subtitles]. Retrieved May 20, 2018, from https://www.dwds.de/r
- Eisenstein, M., Bailey, N., & Madden, C. (1982). It take two: Contrasting tasks and contrasting structures. TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586637
- Engel, U. (2004). Deutsche Grammatik [German grammar]. Iudicium.
- Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 464–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml001
- Ernestus, M. (2000). Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: A corpus-based study of the phonology-phonetics interface [Doctoral dissertation]. LOT.
- Ernestus, M. (2014). Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua, 142, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.006
- Ernestus, M., Hanique, I., & Verboom, E. (2015). The effect of speech situation on the occurrence of reduced word pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.08.001
- Frances, C., Costa, A., & Baus, C. (2018). On the effects of regional accents on memory and credibility. Acta Psychologica, 186, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.003
- Glisky, E. L. (2007). Changes in cognitive function in human aging. In D. R. Riddle (Ed.), Brain aging: Models, methods, mechanisms (pp. 3–20). CRC Press.
- Grey, S., & van Hell, J. G. (2017). Foreign-accented speaker identity affects neural correlates of language comprehension. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 42, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.12.001
- Hanique, I., Ernestus, M., & Schuppler, B. (2013). Informal speech processes can be categorical in nature, even if they affect many different words. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), 1644–1655. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4790352
- Hanulíková, A. (2019). Bewertung und Grammatikalität regionaler Syntax. Eine empirische Untersuchung zur Rolle der SprecherInnen und HörerInnen [Evaluation and grammaticality of regional syntax. An empirical study of the role of speakers and listeners]. Linguistik Online, 98(5), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.98.5936
- Hanulíková, A., & Carreiras, M. (2015). Electrophysiology of subject-verb agreement mediated by speakers’ gender. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01396
- Hanulíková, A., van Alphen, P. M., van Goch, M. M., & Weber, A. (2012). When one person’s mistake is another’s standard usage: The effect of foreign accent on syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(4), 878–887. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00103
- Hay, J., & Bresnan, J. (2006). Spoken syntax: The phonetics of giving a hand in New Zealand English. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.013
- Institut für Deutsche Sprache. (2017). Deutsches Referenzkorpus/Archiv der Korpora geschriebener Gegenwartssprache 2017-II (Release vom 01.10.2017) [German reference corpus/Archive of corpora of written contemporary language 2017-II]. Retrieved May 9, 2018, from https://cosmas2.ids-mannheim.de/cosmas2-web/
- Johnson, K. (2006). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.004
- Kemps, R. J. J. K., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. R. (2005). Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193061
- Klein, W. P. (2003). Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle als linguistischer Gegenstand: Zur Einführung in ein vergessenes Thema der Sprachwissenschaft [Linguistic doubtful cases as a linguistic subject: Introduction to a forgotten topic of linguistics]. Linguistik Online, 16(4), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.16.793
- Klein, W. P. (2009). Auf der Kippe? Zweifelsfälle als Herausforderung(en) für Sprachwissenschaft und Sprachnormierung [On the edge? Doubts as challenge(s) for linguistics and language standardization]. In M. Konopka & B. Strecker (Eds.), Deutsche Grammatik - Regeln, Normen, Sprachgebrauch theoretisch (pp. 141–165). De Gruyter.
- Klein, W. P. (2018). Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle im Deutschen: Theorie, Praxis, Geschichte [Linguistic doubtful cases in German: Theory, practice, history]. De Gruyter.
- Kleinschmidt, D. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2015). Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel. Psychological Review, 122(2), 148–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038695
- Kleinschmidt, D. F., Weatherholtz, K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2018). Sociolinguistic perception as inference under uncertainty. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 818–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12331
- Koch, P., & Oesterreicher, W. (2007). Schriftlichkeit und kommunikative Distanz [Writtenness and communicative distance]. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 35(3), 346–375. https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl.2007.024
- Kohler, K. J. (1990). Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: Phonological facts and phonetic explanations. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 69–92). Kluwer.
- Kohler, K. J. (1995). Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen [Introduction to the phonetics of German] (2nd ed.). Schmidt.
- Koppen, K., Ernestus, M., & van Mulken, M. (2019). The influence of social distance on speech behavior: Formality variation in casual speech. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 15(1), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0056
- Kraljic, T., Samuel, A. G., & Brennan, S. E. (2008). First impressions and last resorts: How listeners adjust to speaker variability. Psychological Science, 19(4), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02090.x
- Kroczek, L. O. H., & Gunter, T. C. (2017). Communicative predictions can overrule linguistic priors. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17581. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17907-9
- Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
- Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
- Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache. (2019). Deutsches Referenzkorpus/Archiv der Korpora geschriebener Gegenwartssprache 2019-I (Release vom 18.03.2019) [German reference corpus/Archive of corpora of written contemporary language 2019-I]. Retrieved July 12, 2019, from https://cosmas2.ids-mannheim.de/cosmas2-web/
- Lev-Ari, S., & Keysar, B. (2012). Less-detailed representation of non-native language: Why non-native speakers’ stories seem more vague. Discourse Processes, 49(7), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.698493
- Lüngen, H. (2017). DeReKo – Das Deutsche Referenzkorpus [DeReKo – The German reference corpus]. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 45(1), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0008
- Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
- Munnich, E., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1994). Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks: What they measure and how they relate to each other. In E. E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 227–244). Erlbaum.
- Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007
- Pardo, J. S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 119(4), 2382–2393. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2178720
- Payne, B. R., & Silcox, J. W. (2019). Aging, context processing, and comprehension. In K. D. Federmeier (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 71, pp. 215–264). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2019.07.001
- Peelle, J. E. (2019). Language and aging. In G. I. de Zubicaray & N. O. Schiller (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of neurolinguistics (pp. 295–316). Oxford University Press.
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Ryskin, R., Levy, R. P., & Fedorenko, E. (2020). Do domain-general executive resources play a role in linguistic prediction? Re-evaluation of the evidence and a path forward. Neuropsychologia, 136, 107258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107258
- Sayers, D. (2014). The mediated innovation model: A framework for researching media influence in language change. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12069
- Scott, A. K. (2011). Everyday language in the spotlight: The decline of the genitive case. German as a Foreign Language Journal, 2011(1), 53–70. http://www.gfl-journal.de/1-2011/Scott.pdf
- Scott, A. K. (2014). The genitive case in Dutch and German: A study of morphosyntactic change in codified languages. Brill.
- Squires, L. (2013). It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 17(2), 200–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12025
- Squires, L. (2014a). Processing, evaluation, knowledge: Testing the perception of English subject-verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(2), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214526057
- Squires, L. (2014b). Talker specificity and the perception of grammatical variation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(7), 856–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.804193
- Staum Casasanto, L. (2008). Does social information influence sentence processing? In B. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 799–804). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Staum Casasanto, L. (2009). Experimental investigations to sociolinguistic knowledge [Doctoral dissertation]. Stanford University.
- Stuart-Smith, J. (2011). The view from the couch: Changing perspectives on the role of television in changing language ideologies and use. In T. Kristiansen & C. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 223–239). Novus Press.
- Szczepaniak, R. (2014). Sprachwandel und sprachliche Unsicherheit: Der formale und funktionale Wandel des Genitivs seit dem Frühneuhochdeutschen [Language change and linguistic uncertainty: The formal and functional change of the genitive since Early New High German]. In A. Plewnia & A. Witt (Eds.), Sprachverfall? Dynamik – Wandel – Variation (pp. 33–49). De Gruyter.
- Tagliamonte, S. A., & D’Arcy, A. (2007). Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change, 19(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095439450707007X
- Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.332
- Viebahn, M. C., Ernestus, M., & McQueen, J. M. (2017). Speaking style influences the brain’s electrophysiological response to grammatical errors in speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(7), 1132–1146. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01095
- Vieregge, A. (2019). Speakers’ doubts about prepositional case government in German. In R. Szczepaniak, E. Schmitt, & A. Vieregge (Eds.), Sprachliche Zweifelsfälle: Definition, Erforschung, Implementierung (pp. 69–96). Olms.
- Vinther, T. (2002). Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00024
- Walsh, M., Möbius, B., Wade, T., & Schütze, H. (2010). Multilevel exemplar theory. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 537–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01099.x
- Weissler, R. E., & Brennan, J. R. (2020). How do listeners form grammatical expectations to African American Language. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 25(2), Article 16. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol25/iss2/16
- Yu, A. C. L., Abrego-Collier, C., & Sonderegger, M. (2013). Phonetic imitation from an individual-difference perspective: Subjective attitude, personality and “autistic” traits. PloS One, 8(9), e74746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074746