References
- Anderson, R., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., McNurlen, B., Archodidou, A., Kim, S., Reznitskaya, A., Tillmanns, M., & Gilbert, L. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1
- Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Waggoner, M., & Nguyen, K. (1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 170–186). Guilford.
- Applebee, A. (1996). Curriculum as conversation. University of Chicago Press.
- Barnes, D. (1976). From Communication to Curriculum. Penguin.
- Barzilai, S., & Weinstock, M. (2015). Measuring epistemic thinking within and across topics: A scenario-based approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.06.006
- Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.636495
- Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412284
- Bendixen, L. D., & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_7
- Boyes, M. C., & Chandler, M. (1992). Cognitive development, epistemic doubt, and identify formation in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(3), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537019
- Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Education Research Journal, 42(4), 697–726. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042004697
- Chandler, M., Boyes, M., & Ball, L. (1990). Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50(3), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(90)90076-K
- Chen, Y., Benus, M. J., & Hernandez, J. (2019). Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. Science Education, 103(5), 1235–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21527
- Chen, Y., Hand, B., & Park, S. (2016). Examining elementary students’ development of oral and written argumentation practices through argument-based inquiry. Science Education, 25(3–4), 277–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9811-0
- Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560944
- Clarke, S. N., Howley, I., Resnick, L., & Rose´, C. P. (2016). Student agency to participate in dialogic science discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.002
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
- Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd ed.). Wiley.
- Crowell, C., & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2),363-381. doi:doi.https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725187
- De La Paz, S., Ferretti, R., Wissinger, D., Yee, L., & MacArthur, C. (2012). Adolescents’ disciplinary use of evidence, argumentative strategies, and organizational structure in writing about historical controversies. Written Communication, 29(4), 412–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312461591
- Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., & Barzilai, S. (2018). Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards’ conceptualization of evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 907–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21468
- Elmore, R. (2018). Beijing academy: Innovation, design, and learning. ECNU Review of Education, 1(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.30926/ecnuroe2018010108
- Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
- Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
- Felton, M. (2004). The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation. Cognitive Development, 19(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.001
- Felton, M., Crowell, A., & Liu, T. (2015). Arguing to agree: Mitigating the effects of my-side bias through consensus-seeking dialogue. Written Communication, 32(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315590788
- Felton, M., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2009). Deliberation versus dispute: The impact of argumentative discourse goals on learning and reasoning in the science classroom. Informal Logic, 29(4), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v29i4.2907
- Ferretti, R. P., & De La Paz, S. (2011). On the comprehension and production of written texts: Instructional activities that support content-area literacy. In R. O’Connor & P. Vadasy (Eds.), Handbook of reading interventions (pp. 326–355). Guilford Press.
- Ferretti, R. P., & Graham, S. (2019). Argumentative writing: Theory, assessment, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 32(6), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09950-x
- Ford, M. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20263
- Golanics, J. D., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2008). Enhancing online collaborative argumentation through question elaboration and goal instruction. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00251.x
- Greene, J. S., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. Routledge.
- Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains: Disposition, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
- Hemberger, L., Kuhn, D., Matos, F., & Shi, Y. (2017). A dialogic path to evidence-based argumentive writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(4),575–607. doi:doi.https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336714
- Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
- Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
- Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
- Iordanou, K. (2016). Developing epistemological understanding in scientific and social domains through argumentation. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 30(2–3), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000172
- Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. (2015). Supporting use of evidence in argumentation through practice in argumentation and reflection in the context of SOCRATES learning environment. Science Education, 99(2),282–311
- Iordanou, K., & Kuhn, D. (2020). Contemplating the opposition: Does a personal touch matter? Discourse Processes, 57(4), 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1701918
- Iordanou, K., Muis, K., & Kendeou, P. (2019). Epistemic perspectives and online epistemic processing of evidence: Developmental and domain differences. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(4), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1482857
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (1992). Thinking about theories or thinking with theories? A classroom study with natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069920140106
- Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). Dimensions of dialogue: Large classes in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(8), 739–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(98)00061-5
- Kelly, G., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students’ reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200707
- Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students’ use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10024
- Kienhues, D., Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (2008). Changing epistemological beliefs: The unexpected impact of a short-term intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X268589
- Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the web: When expert information breeds laypersons’ doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.004
- Kim-Goh, M. (1995). Serving Asian American children in school: An ecological perspective. In S. W. Rothstein (Ed.), Class, culture, and race in American schools (pp. 145–160). Greenwood.
- King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Kuhn, D. (2009). The importance of learning about knowing: Creating a foundation fro development of intellectual values. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00089.x
- Kuhn, D. (2019). Critical thinking as discourse. Human Development, 62(3), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500171
- Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
- Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402512
- Kuhn, D., Feliciano, N., & Kostikina, D. (2019). Engaging contemporary issues as practice for citizenship. The Social Studies, 110(5), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2019.1625856
- Kuhn, D., Goh, W., Iordanou, K., & Shaenfield, D. (2008). Arguing on the computer: A microgenetic study of developing argument skills in a computer-supported environment. Child Development, 79(5), 1310–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01190.x
- Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2016). Argue with me: Argument as a path to developing students’ thinking and writing (2nd ed.). Routlege.
- Kuhn, D., Iordanou, K., Pease, M., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
- Kuhn, D., & Moore, W. (2015). Argument as core curriculum. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.994254.
- Kuhn, D., & Park, S. (2005). Epistemological understanding and the development of intellectual values. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.05.003
- Kuhn, D., Pennington, N., & Leadbeater, B. (1983). Adult thinking in developmental perspective. In P. Baltes & O. Brim (Eds.), Lifespan development and behavior (pp. 157–195). Academic Press.
- Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2011). Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and values of argumentive discourse. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638531003653344
- Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
- Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003285
- Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027001029
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.
- Leah, J., Driver, R., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1997). A study of progression in learning about ‘the nature of science’: Issues of conceptualization and methodology. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190202
- Li, L., & Wegerif, R. (2014). What does it mean to teach thinking in China? Challenging and developing notions of ‘Confucian education’. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.09.003
- Manz, E. (2015). Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 553–590. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314558490
- Manz, E. (2016). Examining evidence construction as the transformation of the material world into community knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1113–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21264
- Manz, E., & Renga, I. (2017). Understanding how teachers guide evidence construction conversations. Science Education, 101(4), 584–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21282
- Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Searching the web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38(6), 607–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y
- Mason, L., Gava, M., & Boldrin, A. (2008). On warm conceptual change: The interplay of text, epistemological beliefs, and topic interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.291
- Mason, L., & Scirica, F. (2006). Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 492–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.007
- Mayweg-Paus, E., Macagno, F., & Kuhn, D. (2016). Developing argumentation strategies in electronic dialogs: Is modeling effective? Discourse Processes, 53(4), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1040323
- McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
- McNeill, K., & Berland, L. (2016). What is (or should be) scientific evidence use in K-12 classrooms? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 672–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21381
- Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
- Mehan, H., & Cazden, C. (2015). The study of classroom discourse: Early history and current developments. In L. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. American Educational Research Association.
- Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
- Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2009). Intuitive and reflective inferences. In J. St, B. T. Evans, & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 149–170). Oxford University Press.
- Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(2), 57–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968
- Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 27(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
- Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 27(4),283–297.
- Michaels, S., & O’Connor, M. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussions. In L. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. American Educational Research Association.
- Moshman, D. (2015). Epistemic cognition and development: The psychology of justification and truth. Psychology Press.
- Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
- Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3
- Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977–1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701545919
- Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
- Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
- Papathomas, L., & Kuhn, D. (2017). Learning to argue via apprenticeship. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.013
- Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (1995). Role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science concepts from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.282
- Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. (2000). Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/105735600278060
- Resnick, L., Asterhan, C., Clarke, S., & Schantz, F. (2018). Next generation research in dialogic learning. In G. Hall, L. Quinn, & D. Gollnick (Eds.), Wiley handbook of teaching and learning. Wiley.
- Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, C. S. C., & Clarke, S. (Eds.). (2015). Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. AERA.
- Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsh, P. Del Río, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Learning in doing: Social, cognitive, and computational aspects. Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge University Press.
- Rosman, T., Mayer, A., Merk, S., & Kerwer, M. (2019). On the benefits of ‘doing science’: Does integrative writing about scientific controversies foster epistemic beliefs? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.007
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20276
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306
- Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
- Sandoval, W. A. (2014). Science education’s need for a theory of epistemological development. Science Education, 98(3), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21107
- Sandoval, W. A., & Çam, A. (2011). Elementary children’s judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification. Science Education, 95(3), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20426
- Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Redman, E. H., & Xiao, S. (2019). Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1848–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641856
- Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
- Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic supports for science inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130
- Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
- Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.406
- Schwarz, B. B., & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue, argumentation and education: History, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Schwarz, D. L. (1999). The productive agency that drives collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 197–218). Pergamon.
- Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Salamounova, Z., Drexlerova, A., & Kychler, J. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217
- Shi, Y. (2019). Enhancing evidence-based argumentation in a Mainland China middle school. Contemporary Educational Psychology. doi:doi.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101809
- Shi, Y. (2020). Constructed dialogs reveal skill development in argumentive writing. Reading and Writing. doi:doi.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10045-1
- Shi, Y., Matos, F., & Kuhn, D. (2019). Dialog as a bridge to argumentive Writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(1),107–129. https://doi: 10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.04
- Sinclair, J. M. H., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by pupils and teachers. Oxford University Press.
- Smith, C. L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students’ epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349–422. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3
- Stanovich, K. E. (1993). It’s practical to be rational. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26(8), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949302600806
- Stein, N. L., & Miller, C. A. (1993). The development of memory and reasoning skill in argumentative contexts: Evaluating, explaining, and generating evidence. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 285–355). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2010). The role of personal epistemology in the self-regulation of Internet-based learning. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9043-7
- Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
- Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543590
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
- Tsai, C. (2004). Information commitments in web-based learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000172748a
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Walton, D., & Zhang, N. (2013). The epistemology of scientific evidence. Artificial Intelligence & Law, 21(2), 173–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9132-9
- Wegerif, N., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to indi- vidual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning & Instruction, 9(6), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013–4
- Weinstock, M., & Cronin, M. A. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror-reasoning skill. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.860
- Weinstock, M., Neuman, Y., & Glassner, A. (2006). Identification of informal reasoning fallacies as a function of epistemological level, grade level, and cognitive ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.327
- Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85–100). American Psychological Association.
- Wertsch, J. V., & Toma, C. (1995). Discourse and learning in the classroom: A sociocultural approach. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 159–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
- Zavala, J., & Kuhn, D. (2017). Solitary discourse is a productive activity. Psychological Science, 28(5), 578586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616689248
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008