References
- Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061/
- Albrecht, J. E., O’Brien, E. J., Mason, R. A., & Myers, J. L. (1995). The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(2), 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.2.364
- Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233936814_An_Elaborative_Processing_Explanation_of_Depth_Processing
- Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory & Cognition, 21(4), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197179
- Cook, A. E., Halleran, J. G., & O’ Brien, E. J. (1998). What is readily available during reading? A memory-based view. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545041
- Cook, A. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (2014). Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.855107
- Ferreira, F., Ferraro, V., & Bailey, K. G. D. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00158
- Fletcher, C. R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90020-3
- Frazier, L. (1999). On sentence interpretation (Vol. 22). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
- Guzman, A. E., & Klin, C. M. (2000). Maintaining global coherence in reading: The role of sentence boundaries. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 722–730. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198406
- Hoaglin, D. C., & Iglewicz, B. (1987). Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(400), 1147–1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478551
- Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99 (1), 122–149. http://ccbi.cmu.edu/reprints/Just_PsychRev-1992_capacity-theory.pdf.
- Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85 (5), 363–394. http://www.someya-net.com/01-Tsuyaku/Reading/vanDijk_Kintsch_Model.pdf.
- Long, D. L., Oppy, B. J., & Seely, M. R. (1997). Individual differences in readers’ sentence- and text-level representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.2485
- Louwerse, M. M., & Jeuniaux, P. (2008). Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic. In M. de Vega, A. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Embodiment and meaning: A debate (pp. 309–326). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0015
- Macizo, P., & Bajo, M. T. (2004). When translation makes the difference: Sentence processing in reading and translation. Psicológica, 25 (2), 181–205. https://www.uv.es/revispsi/articulos2.04/4-MACIZO.pdf
- McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99 (3), 440–466. https://www.macalester.edu/academics/psychology/rali-lab/articles/McKoon%20&%20Ratcliff%20(1992)%20Inference%20During%20Reading.pdf.
- McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the 1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49 (1), 25–42. http://star.psy.ohio-state.edu/wp/pdf/annpsychrev98.pdf.
- Mekni Toujani, M. (2014). The effect of sentential load, semantic relatedness/unrelatedness, and sex on depth of lexical-semantic processing in L1 and L2 reading. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 9 (4), 1830–1856. http://www.ijias.issr-journals.org/abstract.php?article=IJIAS-14-245-12
- Mekni Toujani, M. (2017). Integrating incoming information into discourse model in Tunisian Arabic. In A. Botinis (Ed..), Proceedings of 8th tutorial and research workshop on experimental linguistics (pp. 109–112). University of Athens. http://www.exlingworkshop.com/images/ExLing-2017/ProceedingsExLing2017.pdf
- Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., & Greenspan, S. L. (1989). Updating situation models during comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(3), 292–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90035-1
- Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(2), 165–187.https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(87)90122-7
- Myers, J. L., O’Brien, E. J., Albrecht, J. E., & Mason, R. A. (1994). Maintaining global coherence during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20 (4), 876–886.https://doi.org/10.1037/0278–7393.20.4.876
- Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 131–157.https://doi.org/0.1080/01638539809545042
- O’Brien, E. J., Cook, A. E., & Pcracchi, K. A. (2004). Updating situation models: Reply to Zwaan and Madden (2004). Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30 (1), 289–291.https://doi.org/10.1037/0278–7393.30.1.289
- O’Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(4), 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.777
- O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Coherence threshold and the continuity of processing: The RI-Val model of comprehension. Discourse Processes, 53(5–6), 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1123341
- O’Brien, E. J., & Myers, J. L. (1999). Text comprehension: A view from the bottom up. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 159–176). Erlbaum.
- O’Brien, E. J., Rizella, M. L., Albrecht, J. E., & Halleran, J. G. (1998). Updating a situation model: A memory-based text processing view. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(5), 1200–1210.https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.24.5.1200
- Peirce, J. W. (2009). Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2 (10), 1–8.https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.010.2008
- Sanford, A. J., & Sturt, P. (2002). Depth of processing in language comprehension: Not noticing the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(9), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01958-7
- Sanford, A. J. S., Molle, J., Sanford, A. J., & Healy, N. (2004, September 18). Shallow semantic processing of spoken utterances. Poster presented at the architectures and mechanisms of language processing conference, university of Aix-en-Provence, France. http://aune.lpl.univ-aix.fr/~fulltext/2037.pdf
- Sanford, A. J. S., Sanford, A. J., Filik, R., & Molle, J. (2005). Depth of lexical-semantic processing and sentential load. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(3), 378–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.004
- Singer, M., Graesser, A. C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1020
- Smith, E. R., & O’Brien, E. J. (2012). Tracking spatial information during reading: A cue-based process. Memory & Cognition, 40(5), 791–801. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0190-8
- Stewart, A. J., Kidd, E., & Haigh, M. (2009). Early sensitivity to discourse-level anomalies: Evidence from self-paced reading. Discourse Processes, 46(1), 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802629091
- Sturt, P., Sanford, A. J., Stewart, A. J., & Dawydiak, E. (2004). Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 (5), 882–888. http://web.me.com/andrewjstewart/Site/Download_Papers_files/Sturt%20et%20al%202004.pdf.
- Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544959
- van Berkum, J. J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 (6), 657–671. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_61266_2/component/file_61267/content.
- van Berkum, J. J., Zwisterlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17 (3), 701–718. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a948/ac70c8f43281cf3a5a1b9473c64de80d1b23.pdf.
- van den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. (2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment: Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School Psychology Review, 41(3), 315–325. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087512?scroll=top&needAccess=true
- van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M. J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M. T. McCrudden, J. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Relevance instructions and goalfocusing in text learning (pp. 123–140). Information Age Publishing.
- van den Broek, P., Lorch, R. E. J., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206376
- van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch Jr. & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Weiskopf, D. (2010). Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.005
- Yeari, M., van den Broek, P., & Oudega, M. (2015). Processing and memory of central versus peripheral information as a function of reading goals: Evidence from eye-movements. Reading and Writing, 28(8), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9561-4
- Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 (2), 386–397.https://doi.org/10.1037/0278–7393.21.2.386