References
- Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
- Bellafante, G. (2020, May 1). Streets should be car-free during lockdown. And after. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/01/nyregion/coronavirus-streets-closed-nyc.html
- Blanc, N., Kendeou, P., Van Den Broek, P., & Brouillet, D. (2008). Updating situation models during reading of news reports: Evidence from empirical data and simulations. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530701792784
- Blanc, N., Stiegler-Balfour, J. J., & O’Brien, E. J. (2011). Does the certainty of information influence the updating process? Evidence from the reading of new articles. Discourse Processes, 48(6), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1081/0163853X.2011.552844
- Bohn-Gettler, C. M. (2020). Learning from multiple perspectives: Processes and strategies associated with texts. In P. Van Meter, A. List, D. Lombardi, & P. Kendeou (Eds.), Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives (pp. 245–258). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Braasch, J. L., & Bråten, I. (2017). The discrepancy-induced source comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1323219
- Braasch, J. L., McCabe, R. M., & Daniel, F. (2016). Content integration across multiple documents reduces memory for sources. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1571–1598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9609-5
- Braasch, J. L., Rouet, J. F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M. A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 40(3), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0160-6
- Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.1.1
- Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
- Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J. F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. Van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–233). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Diaz, J. (2020, April 11). Cities close streets to cars, opening space for social distancing. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/us/coronavirus-street-closures.html
- Du, H., & List, A. (2020). Learning and instruction. Researching and Writing Based on Multiple Texts, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101297
- Hess, D. (2008). Controversial issues and democratic discourse. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 124–136). Routledge.
- Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the web: When expert information breeds laypersons’ doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.004
- Kim, H. J. J., & Millis, K. (2006). The influence of sourcing and relatedness on event integration. Discourse Processes, 41(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4101_4
- Latini, N., Bråten, I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Salmerón, L. (2019). Investigating effects of reading medium and reading purpose on behavioral engagement and textual integration in a multiple text context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101797
- List, A., Du, H., & Lee, H. Y. (2020). How do students integrate multiple texts? An investigation of top-down processing. European Journal of Psychology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00497-y
- List, A., Du, H., Wang, Y., & Lee, H. Y. (2019). Toward a typology of integration: Examining the documents model framework. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.003
- McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
- Meyer, B. J., & Poon, L. W. (2001). Effects of structure strategy training and signaling on recall of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.141
- Millis, K. K., King, A., & Kim, H. J. J. (2000). Updating situation models from descriptive texts: A test of the situational operator model. Discourse Processes, 30(3), 201–236. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp3003_1
- Nash, J. G., Schumacher, G. M., & Carlson, B. W. (1993). Writing from sources: A structure-mapping model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.159
- Otero, J. (2002). Noticing and fixing difficulties while understanding science texts. In J. Otero, J. A. Le¢n, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 281–307). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 88–108). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Poortman, A. R., & Kalmijn, M. (2002). Women’s labour market position and divorce in the Netherlands: Evaluating economic interpretations of the work effect. European Journal of Population, 18(2), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015520411449
- Rouet, J. F., Le Bigot, L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1549–1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9625-0
- Salmerón, L., Gil, L., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. (2010). Comprehension effects of signaling relationships between documents in search engines. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.013
- Saux, G., Britt, A., Le Bigot, L., Vibert, N., Burin, D., & Rouet, J. F. (2017). Conflicting but close: Readers’ integration of information sources as a function of their disagreement. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0644-5
- Saux, G., Ros, C., Britt, M. A., Stadtler, M., Burin, D. I., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Readers’ selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1463722
- Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal. Review of Educational Research, 87(6), 1007–1041. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317722961
- Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9015-3
- Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). The MIT Press.
- Stahl, S. A., Hynd, C. R., Britton, B. K., McNish, M. M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.4.5
- Stang Lund, E., Bråten, I., Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2017). Memory for textual conflicts predicts sourcing when adolescents read multiple expository texts. Reading Psychology, 38(4), 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1278417
- Stevens, R. J. (1988). Effects of strategy training on the identification of the main idea of expository passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.21
- Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2009). Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and multiple‐text comprehension among upper secondary students. Educational Psychology, 29(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903046864
- Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 176–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769994
- White, H. (1973). Interpretation in history. New Literacy History, 4(2), 281–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/468478
- Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060–1106. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333183
- Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301
- Wolfe, M. B., & Goldman, S. R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23(4), 467–502. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2304_2