Lost in a Story, Detached from the Words

References

• Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. G. (2009). A glossary of literary terms (9th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, R. (2003, June 16). De Invaller. NRC Handelsblad. https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2003/06/16/de-invaller-7642950-a1353672
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bálint, K., Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Doicaru, M., & Tan, E. S. (2016). Reconceptualizing foregrounding: Identifying response strategies to deviation in absorbing narratives. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(2), 176–207. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.2.02bal
   Google Scholar
• Barton, J. J. S., Hanif, H. M., Björnström, L. E., & Hills, C. (2014). The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(5–6), 378–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417727521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G. (2014). Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, B., & Hains, S. (1979). Individual differences in word recognition latency. Memory & Cognition, 7(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carleton, R. N., Abrams, M. P., & Asmundson, G. J. G. (2010). The attentional resource allocation scale (ARAS): psychometric properties of a composite measure for dissociation and absorption: Research article: Attentional resource allocation scale (ARAS). Depression and Anxiety, 27(8), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chateau, D., & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, R. A. I., Arnell, R., Birchenough, J. M. H., Grimmond, D., & Houlson, S. (2017). Reading through the life span: Individual differences in psycholinguistic effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 1298–1338. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirix, N., Brysbaert, M., & Duyck, W. (2019). How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2800–2816. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1158-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eekhof, L. S., Eerland, A., & Willems, R. M. (2018). Readers’ insensitivity to tense revealed: No differences in mental simulation during reading of present and past tense stories. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.121
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M., Bixler, R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018). An automated behavioral measure of mind wandering during computerized reading. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0857-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, M., Krasich, K., Bixler, R. E., Brockmole, J. R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2020). The eye–mind wandering link: Identifying gaze indices of mind wandering across tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1201–1221. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000743
   Google Scholar
• Foulsham, T., Farley, J., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Mind wandering in sentence reading: Decoupling the link between mind and eye. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 67(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., Dera, J., Nijhof, A. D., & Willems, R. M. (2019). Is less readable liked better? The case of font readability in poetry appreciation. PLoS ONE, 14(12), e0225757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790942
   Google Scholar
• Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429500633
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, F., Kuijpers, M. M., Tan, E. S., Bálint, K., & Doicaru, M. M. (2017). Narrative absorption. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hamelink, J. (1966). Horror vacui. Polak & Van Gennep.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Lüdtke, J. (2017). Immersion into narrative and poetic worlds: A neurocognitive poetics perspective. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Narrative absorption (pp. 69–96). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.05jac
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1312–1318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 846–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280544000075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1–2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440340000213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., & Laubrock, J. (2017). Eye-movement tracking during reading. In A. M. B. De Groot & P. Hagoort (Eds.), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp. 68–88). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, E. M. (2015). Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50, 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, M. M. (2014). Absorbing stories: The effects of textual devices on absorption and evaluative responses. Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/304849
   Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, M. M., Douglas, S., & Kuiken, D. (2019). Personality traits and reading habits that predict absorbed narrative fiction reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2011). Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye-movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(1), 42–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammers, J. (2017, January 10). 500 à 1000: Hoe de wolven dansen. De Revisor. http://www.revisor.nl/entry/2363/hoe-de-wolven-dansen
   Google Scholar
• Leinenger, M., & Rayner, K. (2017). What we know about skilled, beginning, and older readers from monitoring their eye movements: Implications for teaching reading. In J. A. León & I. Escudero (Eds.), Reading Comprehension In Educational Settings (pp. 1–27). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.16.01lei
   Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Graesser, A. C., Eymard, L. A., Haberlandt, K., & Gholson, B. (1993). Locus of interpretive and inference processes during text comprehension: A comparison of gaze durations and word reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(3), 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainz, N., Shao, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Meyer, A. S. (2017). Vocabulary knowledge predicts lexical processing: Evidence from a group of participants with diverse educational backgrounds. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, M., & Willems, R. M. (2018). Mental simulation during literary reading: Individual differences revealed with eye-tracking. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(4), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1552007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marian, V., Bartolotti, J., Chabal, S., & Shook, A. (2012). CLEARPOND: Cross-linguistic easy-access resource for phonological and orthographic neighborhood densities. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchior, W. (1992). De roeping van het vlees. Atlas Contact.
   Google Scholar
• Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Kuehnast, M., & Jacobsen, T. (2015). Towards a psychological construct of being moved. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0128451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabokov, V. (2003). Een Russische Schoonheid 1. De Bezige Bij.
   Google Scholar
• Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., Ferchaud, A., Yang, C., Huang, Y., & Bailey, E. (2017). Absorption and meaningfulness: Examining the relationship between eudaimonic media use and engagement. In F. Hakemulder, M. M. Kuijpers, E. S. Tan, K. Bálint, & M. M. Doicaru (Eds.), Linguistic approaches to literature (pp. 253–269). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.13oli
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orquin, J. L., & Holmqvist, K. (2018). Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1645–1656. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0998-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., & Rosa, E. (2000). The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification tasks: A review. Psicologica, 21(2), 327–340.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., Goldman, S. R., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollatsek, A., Perea, M., & Binder, K. S. (1999). The effects of “neighborhood size” in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(4), 1142–1158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.4.1142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, M. L. (1981). The short story: The long and the short of it. Poetics, 10(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(81)90033-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017) . R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Radach, R., Huestegge, L., & Reilly, R. (2008). The role of global top-down factors in local eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Research, 72(6), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(5), 734–747. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Kambe, G., & Duffy, S. A. (2000). The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 53(4), 1061–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755934
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3–4), SI21–SI49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690968908406362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R-hack/mer-utils.R. (2014, May 20). https://github.com/aufrank/R-hacks/blob/master/mer-utils.R
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C. (2012). Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition, 125(2), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1270–1281. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, I., Hosoya, G., Menninghaus, W., Beermann, U., Wagner, V., Eid, M., & Scherer, K. R. (2017). Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0178899. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, C. R., Siakaluk, P. D., Chow, V. C., & Buchanan, L. (2008). Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37(4), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9071-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Johnson, B. K., Cohen, J., Comello, M. L. G., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2014). Temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self: Motivations for entering the story world and implications for narrative effects: Temporarily expanded boundaries of the self. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, J. (2011). Mind-wandering while reading: Attentional decoupling, mindless reading and the cascade model of inattention: mind-wandering while reading. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2702_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/747605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tainturier, M. J., Tremblay, M., & Lecours, A. (1992). Educational level and the word frequency effect: A lexical decision investigation. Brain and Language, 43(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(92)90112-R
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, E. S. (1996). Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203812761
   Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thissen, B. A. K., Menninghaus, W., & Schlotz, W. (2018). Measuring optimal reading experiences: The reading flow short scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2542. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Hoven, E., Hartung, F., Burke, M., & Willems, R. (2016). Individual differences in sensitivity to style during literary reading: Insights from eye-tracking. Collabra: Psychology, 2(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.39
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeden, E. (2015). Ze is overal. In A. L. Snijders (Ed.), Nederland leest de mooiste korte verhalen (Utrecht editie). Stichting Collectieve Propaganda van het Nederlandse Boek
   Google Scholar
• Van Essen, R. (2014). Hier wonen ook mensen. Atlas Contact.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hassel, S. (2012). Ezels. De Bezige Bij.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, L. A., Childs, K. E., Maschinski, C., Paul Niño, N., & Ellsworth, R. (2010). Regulatory fit, processing fluency, and narrative persuasion: Regulatory fit, fluency, and narrative persuasion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(12), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00325.x
   Google Scholar
• Verstegen, J. (1973). De nieuwe vrijheid. AWB.
   Google Scholar
• von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2017). False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., Tse, C.-S., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency revealed by RT distributional analyses: The role of lexical integrity. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 35–62). Elsevierhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44002-4
   Google Scholar