Examining the Simultaneous Effects of L1 Writing, L2 Reading, L2 Proficiency, and Affective Factors on Different Task Types of L2 Writing

References

• Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). Effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45(2), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.247705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandalos, D. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(1), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C.-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E., & Kamil, M. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, V., & Amtmann, D. (2003). Preventing written expression disabilities through early and continuing assessment and intervention for handwriting and/or spelling problems: Research into practice. In H. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323–344). The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bline, D., Lowe, D., Meixner, W. F., Nouri, H., & Pearce, K. (2001). A research note on the dimensionality of Daly and Miller’s writing apprehension scale. Written Communication, 18(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2007). Principle of language learning and teaching. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P., & Connor, U. (1991). Reading and writing descriptive and persuasive texts. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, J. E., Carrell, P., Silberstein, S., Kroll, B., & Kuehn, P. (1990). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y. S., Horwitz, E. K., & Schallert, D. (1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49(3), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y.-S. (2004). A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Brutt-Griffler, J. (2015). Integrated reading and writing: A case of Korean English language learners. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.125/66886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. (2014). Language anxiety in second language learning: Is it really a stumbling block? Second Language Studies, 31(2), 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Conor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwell, S., & McKay, T. (2000). Establishing a valid reliable measure of writing apprehension for Japanese students. JALT Journal, 22(1), 114–139. https://doi.org/10.37546/jaltjj22.1-6
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39(1), 81–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. Journal of Education, 163(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748116300104
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975). The empirical development of an instrument to measure writing apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9(3), 242–249. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40170632
   Google Scholar
• Eisterhold, J. C. (1990). Reading–writing connections: Toward a description for second language learners. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 88–102). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engber, C. A. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90004-7
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purposes, process, and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flahive, D., & Bailey, N. (1993). Exploring reading/writing relationships in adult second language learners. In J. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom (pp. 128–140). Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. (1985). The Attitude Motivation Test Battery: Technical Report. University of West Ontario, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). Reading and writing together: A critical component of English for academic purposes teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.65
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2016). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Language Teaching, 49(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black., W., Babin., B., & Anderson, R. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Liang, X., & Dracopoulos, E. (2011). A study on the relationship between university students’ Chinese proficiency and their English writing proficiency. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p55
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janopoulos, M. (1986). The relationship of pleasure reading and second language writing proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 20(4), 763–768. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.9: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: Scientific Software International
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, P. (2010, April 10). Understanding confidence intervals (CIs) and effect size estimation. Association for Psychological Science Observer, 23 (4). https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/understanding-confidence-intervals-cis-and-effect-size-estimation
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16(1–2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. (2015). Language and cognitive predictors of text comprehension: Evidence from multivariate analysis. Child Development, 86(1), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking the simple view of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S., Petscher, Y., Wanzek, J., & Al Otaiba, S. (2018). Relations between reading and writing: A longitudinal examination from grades 3 to 6. Reading and Writing, 31(7), 1591–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9855-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintch, W. (1998). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2016). Hypothesis testing with confidence intervals and P values in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 12(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2016070101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., & Schallert, D. (2016). Exploring the reading-writing connection: A yearlong classroom-based experimental study of middle school students developing literacy in a new language. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.-W., & Schallert, D. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 713–739. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y. (2005). Facilitating and inhibiting factors in English as a foreign language writing performance: A model testing with structural equation modeling. Language Learning, 55(2), 335–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00306.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., Linton, P., & Johnson, S. (1996). The paradox of writing apprehension. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 295–307). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. (1987). Some thoughts about feelings: The affective domain and writing process. College Composition and Communication, 38(4), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.2307/357635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. (1967). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., & Berstein, H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pae, T.-I. (2008). A structural model for Korean EFL students’ writing performance. English Teaching, 63(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.63.2.200806.121
   Google Scholar
• Pae, T.-I. (2013). Skill-based L2 anxieties revisited: Their intra-relations and the inter-relations with general foreign language anxiety. Applied Linguistics, 34(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pae, T.-I. (2018). Effects of task type and L2 proficiency on the relationship between L1 and L2 in reading and writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pae, T.-I. (2019). A simultaneous analysis of relations between L1 and L2 skills in reading and writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002216
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D. (1985). Changing the face of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 38(8), 724–738. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i20198917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, M. C., & So, S. (1993). Comparing writing process and product across two languages: A study of 6 Singaporean university student writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(93)90005-N
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing production. Discourse Processes, 55(726), 742. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1336042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and their writing production in English as a second language. Reading and Writing, 32(3), 761–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9887-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. M. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki, M., & Hirose, K. (1996). Explanatory variables for EFL students‘ expository writing. Language Learning, 46(1), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb00643.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53(1), 165–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects instructural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Spivey, N. N. (1990). Transforming texts: Constructive processes in reading and writing. Written Communication, 7(2), 256–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088390007002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: A mediation model of self-regulated learning of writing in English as a second/foreign language. Metacognition Learning, 13(2), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-017-9171-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. J., & Pearson, P. (1983). Toward a composing model of reading. Language Arts, 60(5), 568–580. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41961506
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. J., & Shanahan, T. (1991). Research on the reading– Writing relationship: Interactions, transactions, and outcomes. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 246–280). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, W.-K. (1996). Comparing the effects of reading and writing on writing performance. Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.2.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 145–168). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening or language proficiency? Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabihi, R. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. (2012). Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 558–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01398.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2016). Reflections on the pedagogical imports of western practices for professionalizing ESL/EFL writing and writing-teacher education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.39.3.01zha
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar