Reading perspectives moderate text-belief consistency effects in eye movements and comprehension

References

• Abendroth, J., & Richter, T. (2020). Text-belief consistency effect in adolescents’ comprehension of multiple documents from the Web. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(1), 60–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1692289
   Google Scholar
• Abendroth, J., & Richter, T. (2021). Mere plausibility enhances comprehension: The role of plausibility in comprehending an unfamiliar scientific debate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1304–1322. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 106l–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., Thomm, E., & Shlomi Elooz, T. (2020). Dealing with disagreement: The roles of topic familiarity and disagreement explanation in evaluation of conflicting expert claims and sources. Learning and Instruction, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Sigmann, H., & Grothendieck, G. (2019). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4 [Software]. R-package version 1.1-21. http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4
   Google Scholar
• Beker, K., Jolles, D., Lorch, R. F., & van den Broek, P. (2016). Learning from texts: Activation of information from previous texts during reading. Reading and Writing, 29(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9630-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohn-Gettler, C. M., & McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Effects of task relevance instructions and topic beliefs on reading processes and memory. Discourse Processes, 55(4), 410–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1292824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L. G., Haverkamp, Y. E., Latini, N., Shaw, S., Arshad, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2022). Belief bias when adolescents read to comprehend multiple conflicting texts. Reading and Writing, 35(8), 1759–1785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10262-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J.-F. (2014). Scientific Literacy: The role of goal-directed reading and evaluation in understanding scientific information. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D. (1977). Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics, 19(1), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1268249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilead, M., Sela, M., & Maril, A. (2019). That’s my truth: Evidence for involuntary opinion confirmation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618762300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., Kaakinen, J. K., & Penttinen, M. (2016). Eyelink Analysoija - Eye movement data analysis software for computing sentence-level measures [Computer program and manual]. Unpublished computer program. https://seafile.utu.fi/d/18cd89253d /
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., Lorch, R. F., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313–334). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., & Hyönä, J. (2007). Perspective-driven text comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaakinen, J. K., Lehtola, A., & Paattilammi, S. (2015). The influence of a reading task on children’s eye movements during reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(5), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1005623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2019). lmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R‐package version 3.1-0. Retrieved from: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text-belief-consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., Richter, T., & Britt, M. A. (2018). Cognitive processes underlying the text-belief-consistency effect: An eye-movement study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., & Sparks, P. C. (2014). Exploring the effect of task instructions on topic beliefs and topic belief justifications: A mixed methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 51: The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis, R., te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2012). Influence.ME: Tools for detecting influential data in mixed effects models. The R Journal, 4(2), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2012-011
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Models of discourse comprehension. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), Handbook on reading (pp. 217–231). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R CoreTeam. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from: http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52(5–6), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., Appel, M., & Calio, F. (2014). Stories can influence the self-concept. Social Influence, 9(3), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2013.799099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Singer, M. (2017). Discourse updating: Acquiring and revising knowledge through discourse. In D. Rapp, A. Britt, & M. Schober (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed., pp. 167–190). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & van Holt, N. (2005). ELVES: Ein computergestütztes Diagnostikum zur Erfassung der Effizienz von Teilprozessen des Leseverstehens [ELVES: Computer-based assessment of the efficiency of component processes involved in reading comprehension]. Diagnostica, 51(4), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. (2017). RESOLV: Readers’ representation of reading contexts and tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socioscientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socioscientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1–9). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarchi, C., & Mason, L. (2020). Effects of critical thinking on multiple-document comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00426-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Beker, K., & Oudega, M. (2015). Inference generation in text comprehension: Automatic and strategic processes in the construction of a mental representation. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 94–121). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F., Fincher-Kiefer, R., Wiley, J., & Silfies, L. N. (1993). On the processing of arguments. Argumentation, 7(2), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710663
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26, 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309333019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B., & Griffin, T. D. (2017). Beliefs and discourse processes. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & M. A. Britt (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (2nd) ed., pp. 295–314). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar