Document language moderates the text-belief consistency effect

References

• Abendroth, J., & Richter, T. (2020). Text-belief consistency effect in adolescents´ comprehension of multiple documents from the Web. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(1), 60–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1692289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abendroth, J., & Richter, T. (2023). Reading perspectives moderate text-belief consistency effects in eye movements and comprehension. Discourse Processes, 60(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2172300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammon, U. (2001). English as a future language if teaching at German universities? A question of difficult consequences, posed by the decline of German as the language of science. In U. Ammon (Ed.), The dominance of English as the language of science (pp. 343–361). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110869484
   Google Scholar
• Amstad, T. (1978). Wie verständlich sind unsere Zeitungen? [How understandable are our newspapers?] [ Unpublished dissertation]. University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation when reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Andreassen, R. (2016). Sourcing in professional education: Do text factors make any difference? Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1599–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9611-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Britt, M. A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In M. J. Lawson & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning (pp. 276–314). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139048224
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Braasch, J. L. G. (2013). Documents as entities: Extending the situation model theory of comprehension. In M. A. Britt, S. R. Goldman, & J. F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to multiple texts (pp. 160–179). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world: The global language system. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dor, D. (2004). From Englishization to imposed multilingualism: Globalization, the internet, and the political economy of the linguistic code. Public Culture, 16(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-1-97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. F. A. (1948). New readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamel, R. E. (2007). The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science. AILA Review, 20(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.20.06ham
   Google Scholar
• Horiba, Y. (1996). Comprehension processes in L2 reading: Language competence, textual coherence, and inferences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 433–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015370
   Google Scholar
• Horiba, Y. (2000). Reader control in reading: Effects of language competence, text type, and task. Discourse Processes, 29(3), 223–267. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiba, Y., & Fukaya, K. (2015). Reading and learning from L2 text: Effects of reading goal, topic familiarity, and language proficiency. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.10125/66699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isberner, M.-B., & Richter, T. (2014). Comprehension and validation: Separable stages of information processing? A case for epistemic monitoring in language comprehension. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 245–276). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, M. N., & Richter, T. (2021). Biased representations of controversial information: Certainty and justification beliefs as moderators. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 66, Article 101995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, M. N., & Richter, T. (2023a). Belief-biased representations of textual information in bilingual readers: Language as a source characteristic. Current Psychology, 24(12), 9852–9866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02239-9
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, M. N., & Richter, T. (2023b). Thinking dispositions moderate adolescent readers’ mental models of conflicting sport information. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, Article 101233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., Clerwall, C., & Nord, L. (2014). You ain’t seen nothing yet: Transparency’s (lack of) effect on source and message credibility. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 668–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.886837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2014). Students’ consideration of source information during the reading of multiple texts and its effect on intertextual conflict resolution. Instructional Science, 42(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9276-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2018). Effects of conflicting scientific arguments on belief change: Argument evaluation and expert consensus perception as mediators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(4), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2017). Multilingualism online. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., & Barton, D. (2012). Multilingual texts on web 2.0: The case of flickr.com. In M. Sebba, S. Mahootion, & C. Jonsson (Eds.), Language mixing and code-switching in writing (pp. 137–154). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W. (2017). The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from web of science’s three journal citation indexes. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, J. C. (2017). Multilingualism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.769997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., Barnes, A., McTigue, E. M., Welch, C., & MacDonald, E. (2017). The effect of perspective-taking on reasoning about strong and weak belief-relevant arguments. Thinking & Reasoning, 23(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1234411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morishima, Y. (2013). Allocation of limited cognitive resources during text comprehension in a second language. Discourse Processes, 50(8), 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2013.846964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading, and B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65, pp. 249–276). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2016.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Towards a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). The new food fights: U.S. public divides over food science [online document]. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2016/11/PS_2016.12.01_Food-Science_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• R CoreTeam. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52(5), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2018). The role of validation in multiple documents comprehension. In J. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 151–167). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Rivas, C., Corey, J. D., Garcia, X., Thierry, G., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2017). World knowledge and novel information integration during L2 speech comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(3), 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding aprogrammer’s manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(86)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S., Richter, T., & Hoever, I. (2008). Getting a picture that is both accurate and stable: Situation models and epistemic validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413495236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Strien, J. L. H., Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertgen, A., Richter, T., & Rouet, J.-F. (2021). The role of source credibility in the validation of information depends on the degree of (im-)plausibility. Discourse Processes, 58(5–6), 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1881342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertgen, A. G., & Richter, T. (2020). Source credibility modulates the validation of implausible information. Memory & Cognition, 48(8), 1359–1375. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01067-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J. (2005). A fair and balanced look at the news: What affects memory for controversial arguments? Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060–1106. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar