Promoting understanding in digital contexts: using the construction-integration model as a framework for educational technology design and assessment

References

• Bus, A. G., Takacs, Z. K., & Kegel, C. A. T. (2015). Affordances and limitations of electronic storybooks for young children’s emergent literacy. Developmental Review, 35, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. R., Hudson, M. & Runburg, M. (2018). Visualizations for deep learning: Using 3D models to promote scientific observation and reasoning during collaborative STEM inquiry. In R. Zheng (Ed.), Strategies for deep learning with digital technology: Theories and practices in education (pp. 111–135). Nova Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. R., Leary, H., Foster, J., & Devaul, H. (2014). Facilitating teachers’ thinking about pedagogy and technology with an online curriculum planning tool. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 423–447.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2004). The efficacy of electronic books in fostering kindergarten children’s emergent story understanding. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse Processes, 39(2 & 3), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Krcmar, M., & Cingel, D. P. (2014). Parent–child joint reading in traditional and electronic formats. Media Psychology, 17(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.840243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1324727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makransky, G., Borre-Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Motivational and cognitive benefits of training in immersive virtual reality based on multiple assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(6), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition & Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, M., Poitras, E., & Butcher, K. R. (2021). Informal learning with extended reality environments: Current trends in museums, heritage, and tourism. In V. Geroimenko (Ed.), Augmented reality in tourism, museums and heritage: A new technology to inform and entertain (pp. 3–26). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, G. B., Petkakis, G., & Makransky, G. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers and Education, 179, 104429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., MacNamara, A., Ober, T., Rose, M. C., Pawar, S., … Olsen, A. (2020). Emotional design for digital games for learning: The effect of expression, color, shape, and dimensionality on the affective quality of game characters. Learning and Instruction, 70, 101194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, S.-H. C. & Butcher, K. R. (2024). Effects of varied multimedia animations in digital storybooks: A randomised controlled trial with preschoolers. Journal of Research in Reading, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, S.-H. C., Butcher, K. R., & Liang, L. A. (2020). The influence of interactive features in storybook apps on children’s reading comprehension and story enjoyment. The Elementary School Journal, 120(3), 422–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/707009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takacs, Z. K., & Bus, A. G. (2018). How pictures in picture storybooks support young children’s story comprehension: An eye-tracking experiment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 174, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.04.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 698–739. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314566989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar