Notes
- A. Panizzi, Mr Panizzi to the Right Hon. the Earl of Ellesmere - British Museum, January 29, 1848. Appendix to the Report of the Commissioners Appointed to Inquire into the Constitution and Management of the British Museum. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1850. Reprinted in M. Carpenter and E. Svenonius, (eds). Foundations of Cataloging: A Sourcebook (Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1985), 18–47.
- Panizzi, 21.
- A. Seal, “Experiments with Full and Short Entry Catalogues: A Study of Library Needs.” Library Resources and Technical Services, 27, April/June 1983, 90–103.
- E. Svenonius, “Clustering Equivalent Bibliographic Records.” Annual Review of OCLC Research. July 1987/June 1988, 6–8.
- See the view proposed in P. Wilson, “The Second Objective.” In E. Svenonius, E. (ed.). The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1989), 5–16.
- Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office. Format Integration and its Effects on the USMARC bibliographic format. (Washington, DC: Cataloging Distribution Service, Library of Congress, 1988).
- C.A. Cutter, Rules for a Dictionary Catalog. 4th ed., rewritten. (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1904).
- Svenonius, ref. 4.
- Panizzi, 41.
- J.P. Dessauer, Book Publishing: What It Is. What It Does. 2nd ed. (New York: Bowker, 1981).
- For descriptive cataloging, these objectives of the catalog have been articulated by Cutter and Lubetzky and in the Paris Principles. In part, they have been operationalized by the measures of recall and precision. C. A. Cutter and S. Lubetzky, Principles of Cataloging. Final Report, Phase I: Descriptive Cataloging (Los Angeles: Institute of Library Research, 1969), 11–15. Reprinted in M. Carpenter and E. Svenonius (eds.), Foundations of Cataloging: A Sourcebook. (Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 1985), 189-19L. International Conference on Cataloguing Principles (Paris, 1961), A.H. Chaplin and Dorothy Anderson (eds.) (London: Organizing Committee of the Conference, National Central Library, 1963).
- M.B. Line. “Satisfying Bibliographic Needs in the Future: From Publisher to User.” Catalogue & Index. Autumn/Winter, 1988, 10–14.
- Work on operationally defining bibliographic entities of various sorts is currently being pursued by E. Svenonius (UCLA) and E.T. O’Neill (OCLC).
- It has been remarked that the MARC record is not well designed to convey information about bibliographic relationships; yet as we move toward a global information structure the need to do so becomes ever more imperative. See J. Altlg, “Descriptive Cataloging Rules and Machine-Readable Record Structures: Some Directions for Parallel Development,” In E. Svenonius (ed.). The Conceptual Foundations of Descriptive Cataloging (San Diego: Academic Press, 1989), 135–148.
- Cutter, ref. 7.
- Line, ref. 12.
- For the latest review of progress in the area of automated cataloging see S. Weibel, “Automated Cataloging: Implications for Libraries and Patrons.” Paper presented at the 27th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing (Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems: Will They Change the Library?), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, March 23, 1990.
- A.G. Taylor. “Research and Theoretical Considerations in Authority Control.” Cataloging and Classification Quarterly. 9 (3), 1989, 29–56.