On the Conditional Relevance of Controls: An Application of Situational Action Theory to Shoplifting

References

• Ai, Chunrong and Edward Norton. 2003. “Interaction Terms in Logit and Probit Models.” Economic Letters 80:123–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, Leon and Stephen West. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andenaes, Johannes. 1974. Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arneklev, Bruce, Harold Grasmick, Charles Tittle, and Robert Bursik. 1993. “Low Self-Control and Imprudent Behavior.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9:225–239.
   Google Scholar
• Bamfield, Joshua. 2012. Shopping and Crime. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, Ronet, Raymond Paternoster, and Sally Ward. 1992. “The Rationality of Sexual Offending: Testing a Deterrence/Rational Choice Conception of Sexual Assault.” Law & Society Review 26: 343–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Stephen. 2003. “Self-Control, Social Consequences, and Criminal Behavior: Street Youth and the General Theory of Crime.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 40:403–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beccaria, Cesare. [1789] 1987. On Crimes and Punishment. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, Jeremy. [1764] 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, edited by H. L. A. Hart. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, William, Jacqueline DeMeritt, and Justin Esarey. 2010. “Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?” American Journal of Political Science 54:248–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, Harry. 2012. “Testing Moderating Hypotheses in Limited Dependent Variable and Other Nonlinear Models: Secondary Versus Total Interactions.” Journal of Management 38:860–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundeskriminalamt. 2012. Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik. Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berichtsjahr 2011. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Retail Research. 2011. The Global Retail Theft Barometer 2010. Monitoring the Costs of Shrinkage and Crime in the Global Retail Industry. The Worldwide Shrinkage Survey. Newark, UK: CRR.
   Google Scholar
• Chambliss, William. 1967. “Types of Deviance and the Effectiveness of Legal Sanctions.” Wisconsin Law Review 3:703–719.
   Google Scholar
• Chapple, Constance. 2005. “Self-Control, Peer Relations, and Delinquency.” Justice Quarterly 22:89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jacob, Patricia Cohen, Stephen West, and Leon Aiken. 2003. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Farrington, David. 1999. “Measuring, Explaining and Preventing Shoplifting: A Review of British Research.” Security Journal 12:9–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Jason and Lindsey Blumenstein. 2013. “Self-Control and Substance Use Among College Students.” Journal of Drug Issues 43:56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallupe, Owen and Stephen Baron. 2014. “Morality, Self-Control, Deterrence, and Drug Use: Street Youths and Situational Action Theory.” Crime & Delinquency 60:284–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, Michael and Travis Hirschi. 1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, Michael and Travis Hirschi 2003. “Self-Control and Opportunity”. Pp. 5–19 in Control Theories of Crime and Delinquency. Advances in Criminological Theory 12, edited by Chester Britt and Michael Gottfredson. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grasmick, Harold and Donald Green. 1981. “Deterrence and the Morally Committed.” The Sociological Quarterly 22:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, Harold, Charles Tittle, Robert Bursik, and Bruce Arneklev. 1993. “Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30:5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, Lance and Peter Knapp. 2003. “Reassessing Nonlinearity in the Urban Disadvantage/Violent Crime Relationship: An Example of Methodological Bias from Log-Transformation.” Criminology 41:1427–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Judith. 1998. The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe, Joseph. 2011. Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, Helmut, Brenda Blackwell, Heinz Leitgoeb, and Johann Bacher. 2014a. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Juvenile Shoplifting: A Power-Control Theoretical Analysis.” Deviant Behavior 35: 41–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirtenlehner, Helmut, Lieven Pauwels, and Gorazd Mesko. 2014b. “Is the Effect of Perceived Deterrence on Juvenile Offending Contingent on the Level of Self-Control? Results from Three Countries.” British Journal of Criminology 54:109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junger-Tas, Josine. 2012. “Delinquent Behaviour in 30 Countries.” Pp. 69–93 in The Many Faces of Youth Crime. Contrasting Theoretical Perspectives on Juvenile Delinquency Across Countries and Cultures, edited by Josine Junger-Tas, Ineke Haen Marshall, Dirk Enzmann, Martin Killias, Majone Steketee, and Beata Gruszczynska. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klemke, Lloyd. 1992. The Sociology of Shoplifting: Boosters and Snitches Today. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Krasnovsky, Therese and Robert Lane. 1998. “Shoplifting: A Review of the Literature.” Aggression and Violent Behavior 3:219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroneberg, Clemens, Isolde Heintze, and Guido Mehlkop. 2010. “The Interplay of Moral Norms and Instrumental Incentives in Crime Causation.” Criminology 48:575–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makkai, Toni and John Braithwaite. 1994. “The Dialectics of Corporate Crime.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 31:347–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, Gary and Charles Judd. 1993. “Statistical Difficulties of Detecting Interactions and Moderation Effects.” Psychological Bulletin 114:376–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGloin, Jean-Marie and Lauren O’Neill Shermer. 2009. “Self-Control and Deviant Peer Network Structure.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 46:35–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum, Ryan and Carter Hay. 2012. “Do Peers Matter in the Development of Self-Control? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Youth.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 41:691–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum, Ryan, Jacob Young, and Frank Weerman. 2009. “Reconsidering the Effect of Self-Control and Delinquent Peers: Implications of Measurement for Theoretical Significance.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 46:353–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meldrum, Ryan, Jacob Young, and Frank Weerman 2012. “Changes in Self-Control During Adolescence: Investigating the Influence of the Adolescent Peer Network.” Journal of Criminal Justice 40:452–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobarake, Roya, Rumaya Juhari, Siti Yaacob, and Nooshin Esmaeili. 2014. “The Moderating Role of Self-Control in the Relationship Between Peer Affiliation and Adolescents Antisocial Behavior in Teheran, Iran.” Asian Social Science 10:71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Morselli, Carlo and Pierre Tremblay. 2004. “Criminal Achievement, Offender Networks, and the Benefits of Low Self-Control.” Criminology 42:773–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, Daniel. 1998. “Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century.” Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 23:51–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ousey, Graham and Pamela Wilcox. 2007. “Interactions Between Antisocial Propensity and Life-Course Varying Correlates of Delinquent Behavior: Differences by Method of Estimation and Implications for Theory.” Criminology 45:401–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, Raymond. 1987. “The Deterrent Effect of the Perceived Certainty and Severity of Punishment: A Review of the Evidence and Issues.” Justice Quarterly 4:173–217.
   Google Scholar
• Paternoster, Raymond. 2010. “How Much Do We Really Know About Criminal Deterrence?” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100:765–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paternoster, Raymond and Sally Simpson. 1996. “Sanction Threats and Appeals to Morality: Testing a Rational Choice Model of Corporate Crime.” Law & Society Review 30:549–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, Lieven, Frank Weerman, Gerben Bruinsma, and Wim Bernasco. 2011. “Perceived Sanction Risk, Individual Propensity and Adolescent Offending: Assessing Key Findings from the Deterrence Literature in a Dutch Sample.” European Journal of Criminology 8:386–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, Alex, Jeffrey Bouffard, Nicole Leeper-Piquero, and Jessica Craig. 2013. “Does Morality Condition the Deterrent Effect of Perceived Certainty Among Incarcerated Felons?” Crime & Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128713505484
   Google Scholar
• Piquero, Alex, Raymond Paternoster, Greg Pogarsky, and Thomas Loughran. 2011. “Elaborating the Individual Difference Component in Deterrence Theory.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7:335–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogarsky, Greg. 2002. “Identifying ‘Deterrable’ Offenders: Implications for Research on Deterrence.” Justice Quarterly 19:431–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, Travis and Francis Cullen. 2000. “The Empirical Status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime: A Meta-Analysis.” Criminology 38:931–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, Travis, Francis Cullen, Kristie Blevins, Leah Daigle, and Tamara Madensen. 2006. “The Empirical Status of Deterrence Theory: A Meta-Analysis.” Pp. 367–395 in Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, edited by Francis Cullen, John Wright, and Kristie Blevins. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Rebellon, Cesar and Kathryn Modecki. 2013. “Accounting for Projection Bias in Models of Delinquent Peer Influence: The Utility and Limits of Latent Variable Approaches.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 30:163–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Craig and Michelle Dean. 2000. “To Log or Not To Log: Bootstrap as an Alternative to the Parametric Estimation of Moderation Effects in the Presence of Skewed Dependent Variables.” Organizational Research Methods 3:166–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoepfer, Andrea and Alex Piquero. 2006. “Self-Control, Moral Beliefs, and Criminal Activity.” Deviant Behavior 27:51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp 2011. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Stummvoll, Günter, Ingrid Kromer, and Isabella Hager. 2010. “Austria.” Pp. 97–110 in Juvenile Delinquency in Europe and Beyond. Results of the Second International Self-Report Delinquency Study, edited by Josine Junger-Tas, Ineke Haen Marshall, Dirk Enzmann, Martin Killias, Majone Steketee, and Beata Gruszczynska. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Robert. 2014. “An Examination of the Interaction Between Morality and Deterrence in Offending: A Research Note.” Crime & Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128713486068.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Robert and Lieven Pauwels. 2008. “Is a Risky Lifestyle Always ‘Risky’? The Interaction Between Individual Propensity and Lifestyle Risk in Adolescent Offending.” Crime & Delinquency 56:608–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, Robert, Lieven Pauwels, and Frank Weerman. 2010. “Does the Effect of Self-Control Vary by Level of Morality? A Test in Three Countries.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 37:732–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tittle, Charles, Olena Antonaccio, Ekaterina Botchkovar, and Maria Kranidioti. 2010. “Expected Utility, Self-Control, Morality, and Criminal Probability.” Social Science Research 39:1029–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiber, Kyle. 2013. “A Neuropsychological Test of the Dual Process Model of Criminal Decision Making: Regional Prefrontal Influences on Affect and Cognition.” Pp. 193–220 in Affect and Cognition in Criminal Decision Making, edited by Jean-Louis van Gelder, Henk Elffers, Danielle Reynald, and Daniel Nagin. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vazsonyi, Alexander, Lloyd Pickering, Marianne Junger, and Dick Hessing. 2001. “An Empirical Test of a General Theory of Crime: A Four-Nation Comparative Study of Self-Control and the Prediction of Deviance.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 38:91–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, Andrew, Anthony Bottoms, Elizabeth Burney, and Per-Olof H. Wikström. 1999. Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity: An Analysis of Recent Research. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, Mark. 2002. Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, Michael. 2004. “The Social Side of Sanctions: Personal and Social Norms as Moderators of Deterrence.” Law and Human Behavior 28:547–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. 2004. “Crime as Alternative. Towards a Cross-Level Situational Action Theory of Crime Causation.” Pp. 1–37 in Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime, edited by Joan McCord. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. 2006. “Individuals, Settings and Acts of Crime. Situational Mechanisms and the Explanation of Crime.” Pp. 61–107 in The Explanation of Crime: Context, Mechanisms and Development, edited by Per-Olof H. Wikström and Robert Sampson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. 2008. “Deterrence and Deterrence Experiences: Preventing Crime Through the Threat of Punishment.” Pp. 345–378 in International Handbook of Penology and Criminal Justice, edited by Shlomo Shoran, Ori Beck, and Martin Kett. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. 2009. “Crime Propensity, Criminogenic Exposure and Crime Involvement in Early to Mid Adolescence.” Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform 92:253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. 2010a. “Explaining Crime as Moral Action.” Pp. 211–240 in Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, edited by Steven Hitlin and Stephen Vaisey. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. 2010b. “Situational Action Theory.” Pp. 1000–1008 in Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory, edited by Francis Cullen and Pamela Wilcox. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. 2014. “Why Crime Happens: A Situational Action Theory.” Pp. 74–94 in Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks, edited by Gianluca Manzo. Chicester: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. and David Butterworth. 2006. Adolescent Crime. Individual Differences and Lifestyles. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H., Vania Ceccato, Beth Hardie, and Kyle Treiber. 2010. “Activity Fields and the Dynamics of Crime. Advancing Knowledge About the Role of the Environment in Crime Causation.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 26:55–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H., Dietrich Oberwittler, Kyle Treiber, and Beth Hardie. 2012. Breaking Rules. The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. and Robert Svensson. 2008. “Why are English Youths More Violent than Swedish Youths? A Comparative Study of the Role of Crime Propensity, Lifestyles and their Interaction in Two Cities.” European Journal of Criminology 5:309–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H. and Kyle Treiber. 2007. “The Role of Self-Control in Crime Causation. Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime.” European Journal of Criminology 4:237–264.
   Google Scholar
• Wikström, Per-Olof H., Andromachi Tseloni, and Dimitri Karlis. 2011. “Do People Comply with the Law Because They Fear Getting Caught?” European Journal of Criminology 8:401–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Bradley, Avshalom Caspi, Terrie Moffitt, and Phil Silva. 2001. “The Effects of Social Ties on Crime Vary by Criminal Propensity: A Life-Course Model of Interdependence.” Criminology 39: 321–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbrough, Angela, Shayne Jones, Christopher Sullivan, Christine Sellers, and John Cochran. 2012. “Social Learning and Self-Control: Assessing the Moderating Potential of Criminal Propensity.” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 56:191–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring Frank and Gordon Hawkins. 1973. Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar