Integrity, Objectivity, and Accountability in Private Internal White-collar Crime Investigations: The Case of Moscow School Investigation in Norway

References

• ACFE. 2016. CFE Code of Professional Standard. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, www.acfe.com/standards/
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, W. Steve, Chad O. Albrecht, Conan C. Albrecht, and Mark F. Zimbelman. 2011. Fraud Examination, Cengage Learning, www.cengage.com.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, Jim, James Dempsey, and James Megone. 2012. Practical Solutions for Organisations Seeking to Promote and Encourage Integrity. University of Leeds, icaew.com/academic.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Thomas E. 1998. “Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness.” Academy of Management Review 23(1):154–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, Mark 1999. Objectivity, Logic of the History of Ideas 78–126.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Graham and Mark Button. 2011. “The Police and Fraud Investigation and the Case for a Nationalized Solution in the United Kingdom.” The Police Journal 84:305–319.
   Google Scholar
• Button, Mark, Kwabena Frimpong, Geoff Smith, and Les Johnston. 2007. “Professionalizing Counter Fraud Specialists in the UK: Assessing Progress and Recommendations for Reform.” Crime Prevention and Community Safety 9:92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, David. 2013. “Investigations: What Could, and Should, be Taught?” The Police Journal 86(3):249–275.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2004. “The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity.” Synthese 138(3):453–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggar, Jan Warren. 2009. “The Role of Integrity in Individual and Effective Corporate Leadership.” Journal of Academic & Business Ethics, Holy Family University, www.aabri.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young. 2013a. Gransking – NRVS (Investigation Report on School in Moscow), Ernst & Young, Oslo, Norway, October 30, 52 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young. 2013b. Gransking – NRVS, Tilleggsraport (Supplementary Report on the Investigation of the Moscow School), Ernst & Young, Oslo, Norway, December 20, 23 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Fabian, Johannes. 2001. Ethnographic Objectivity Revisited: From Rigor to Vigor, Anthropology with an Attitude: Critical Essays. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fremmerlid, Thor. 2014a. Har Levert Politianmeldelse (Has delivered police report), daily Norwegian local newspaper Romerikes Blad, www.rb.no, published February 9.
   Google Scholar
• Fremmerlid, Thor. 2014b. BI-professor lite imponert over granskingen av Moskva-skolen – Burde gått dypere (BI professor little impressed by the investigation of the Moscow school – Should gone deeper), daily Norwegian local newspaper Romerikes Blad, Thursday, April 24, page 4.
   Google Scholar
• Fremmerlid, Thor. 2014c. Anmeldelsen av Rune Grahn henlagt (Case against Rune Grahn dismissed), daily Norwegian local newspaper Romerikes Blad, www.rb.no, published August 19.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, Petter. 2016. “Blame Game and Rotten Apples in Private Investigation Reports: The Case of Hadeland and Ringerike Broadband in Norway.” Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 13(2):91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, Petter. 2017. “Convenience in White-Collar Crime: Introducing a Core Concept.” Deviant Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2016.1197585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, Petter and Maria Tcherni-Buzzeo. 2016. “Reasons for Gaps in Crime Reporting: The Case of White-Collar Criminals Investigated by Private Fraud Examiners in Norway.” Deviant Behavior, DOI: 10.1080/01639625.2016.1196993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killinger, Barbara. 2010. Integrity: Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Fiona and Robert J. Robinson. 2000. “An Attributional Analysis of Social Accounts: Implications of Playing the Blame Game.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30(9):1853–1879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiter, Brian. 1993. “Objectivity and Problems of Jurisprudence.” Texas Law Review 72:186–209.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Chris, Graham Brooks, Mark Button, David Shepherd, D., and Alison Wakefield. 2014. “Evaluating the Case for Greater Use of Private Prosecutions in England and Wales for Fraud Offences.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 42(1):3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megill, Allan. 1994. “Introduction: Four senses of objectivity.” Pp. 1–21 in Rethinking Objectivity, edited by Megill, Allan. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, Jane F. 2003. “Independence and Objectivity: A Framework for Research Opportunities in Internal Auditing.” Research Opportunities in Internal Auditing 231–268.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Thomas. 1989. The View from Nowhere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, Friedrich W. 1997. “On the Uses and Disadvantages of History of Life.” in Untimely Meditations, edited by Breazeale, Daniel. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, Michael E. 1984. “The Perception of Crime and Criminality: The Violent Criminal and Swindler as Social Types.” Deviant Behavior 5(4):255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterburg, James W. and Richard H. Ward. 2014. Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past, 7th edn. Waltham, MA: Anderson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peacocke, Christopher. 2009. “Objectivity.” Mind, 118(471):739–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Theodore M. 1996. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, Stephen. 2006. “Privatizing Economic Crime Enforcement: Exploring the Role of Private Sector Investigative Agencies in Combating Money Laundering.” Policing & Society 16(3):285–312.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, Tommie W., Aaron J. Singleton, G. Jack Bologna, and Robert J. Lindquist. 2006. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2010. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnier, Blaise M., Walfried M. Lassar, and Sharon S. Lassar. 2015. “The Influence of Source Credibility and Attribution of Blame on Juror Evaluation of Liability of Industry Specialist Auditors.” Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting 7(1):1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Graham. 2009. “Citizen Oversight of Independent Police Services: Bifurcated Accountability, Regulation Creep, and Lessons Learning.” Regulation & Governance 3:421–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trahan, Adam, James Marquart, and Janet Mullings. 2005. “Fraud and the American Dream: Toward an Understanding of Fraud Victimization.” Deviant Behavior 26(6):601–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turhani, Ali. 2015. “Management Education for Professional Integrity: The Case of Economics Faculty.” Journal of International Academic Research for Multidisciplinary 3(3):353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Hernandez, José G., Adrián de Leon-Arias, and Andrés Valdez-Zepeda. 2013. “Enhancing Leadership Integrity Effectiveness Strategy through the Institutionalization of an Organizational Management Integrity Capacity System.” Contemporary Legal and Economic Issues 4:293–332.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, James W. 2005. “Governability Matters: The Private Policing of Economic Crime and the Challenge of Democratic Governance.” Policing & Society 15(2):187–211.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, James W. 2014. “The Private Eyes of Corporate Culture: The Forensic Accounting and Corporate Investigation Industry and the Production of Corporate Financial Security.” Pp. 56–77 in Corporate Security in the 21st Century – Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by Walby, K. and Lippert, R.K. Hampshire, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl, Gary A. and David D. Van Fleet. 1992. “Theory and Research on Leadership in Organizations.” in Pp. 147–197 Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, edited by Dunnett, Marvin D. and Leaetta M. Hough. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zagorin, Perez. 2001. “Francis Bacon’s Concept of Objectivity and the Idols of the Mind.” British Journal of Historical Science 34(4):379–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar