Seeing is Believing? Comparing Negative Affect, Realism and Presence in Visual Versus Written Guardianship Scenarios

References

• Blascovich, Jim, Jack Loomis, Andrew C. Beall, Kimberly R. Swinth, Crystal L. Hoyt, and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2002. “Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology.” Psychological Inquiry 13:103–24. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, Angela, Christopher Pole, and Phillip Mizen. 2001. “Picture This: Researching Child Workers.” Sociology 35:501–18. doi:10.1177/S0038038501000244.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, Jeffrey A. 2002. “The Influence of Emotion on Rational Decision Making in Sexual Aggression.” Journal of Criminal Justice 30 (2):121–34. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(01)00130-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffard, Jeffrey A., Lyn M. Exum, and Raymond Paternoster. 2000. “Wither the Beast? the Role of Emotions in a Rational Choice Theory of Crime.” Pp. 159–78 in Of Crime and Criminality, edited by S. Simpson. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, Michael S., Bryn D. Edwards, and Jill C. Bradley. 2010. “Situational Judgment Tests: Constructs Assessed and a Meta-Analysis of Their Criterion-Related Validities.” Personnel Psychology 63 (1):83–117. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01163.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Lawrence E. and Marcus Felson. 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review 44:588–608. doi:10.2307/2094589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collett, Jessica L. and Ellen Childs. 2011. “Minding the Gap: Meaning, Affect, and the Potential Shortcomings of Vignettes.” Social Science Research 40 (2):513–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darley, John M. and B. Latané. 1968. “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8 (4):377–83. doi: 10.1037/h0025589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, Reinout E., Michael C. Ashton, and Kibeom Lee. 2009. “De Zes Belangrijkste Persoonlijkheidsdimensies En De HEXACO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst. [The Six Most Important Personality Dimensions and the HEXACO Personality Inventory].” Gedrag & Organisatie 22:232–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditto, Peter H., David A. Pizarro., Eden E. Epstein, Jill A. Jacobson, and Tara K. MacDonald. 2006. “Visceral Influences on Risk‐Taking Behavior.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 19 (2):99–113. doi:10.1002/bdm.520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, Craig K. and Deborah L. Bandalos. 2001. “The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models.” Structural Equation Modeling 8:430–57. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exum, Lyn M. 2002. “The Application and Robustness of the Rational Choice Perspective in the Study of Intoxicated and Angry Intentions to Aggress.” Criminology 40 (4):933–66. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00978.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exum, Lyn M. and Jeffrey A. Bouffard. 2010. “Testing Theories of Criminal Decision Making: Someempirical Questions about Hypothetical Scenarios.” Pp. 581–94 in Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, edited by A. R. Piquero and D. Weisburd. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, Janet. 1987. “The Vignette Technique in Survey Research.” Sociology 21 (1):105–14. doi:10.1177/0038038587021001008.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Peter, Joachim I. Krueger, Tobias Greitemeyer, Claudia Vogrincic, Andreas Kastenmüller, Dieter Frey, Moritz Heene, Magdalena Wicher, and Martina Kainbacher. 2011. “The Bystander-Effect: A Meta-Analytic Review on Bystander Intervention in Dangerous and Non-Dangerous Emergencies.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (4):517–37. doi:10.1037/a0023304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofalo, James and David Clark. 1992. “Guardianship and Residential Burglary.” Justice Quarterly 9 (3):443–63. doi:10.1080/07418829200091471.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, Douglas. 2002. “Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17:13–26. doi:10.1080/14725860220137345.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, Tilo, Werner Wirth, Holger Schramm, Christoph Klimmt, Peter Vorderer, Andre Gysbers, Saskia Böcking, Niklas Ravaja, Jari Laarni, Timo Saari, et al. 2016. “The Spatial Presence Experience Scale (SPES).” Journal of Media Psycholog 28:1–15. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis-Peel, Meghan E., Danielle M. Reynald, Maud Van Bavel, M. Henk Elffers, and Brandon C. Welsh. 2011. “Guardianship for Crime Prevention: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 56 (1):53–70. doi:10.1007/s10611-011-9309-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis-Peel, Meghan E. and Brandon C. Welsh. 2014. “What Makes A Guardian Capable? A Test of Guardianship in Action.” Security Journal 27 (3):320–37. doi:10.1057/sj.2012.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Li-Tze, and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.” Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepper, Steven and Daniel Nagin. 1989. “The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Certainty and Severity of Punishment Revisited.” Criminology 27 (4):721–46. doi:10.1111/crim.1989.27.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazerolle, Paul, Alex R. Piquero, and George E. Capowich. 2003. “Examining the Links between Strain, Situational and Dispositional Anger, and Crime Further Specifying and Testing General Strain Theory.” Youth & Society 35 (2):131–57. doi:10.1177/0044118X03255029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meenaghan, Amy, Claire Nee, Jean-Louis van Gelder, Marco Otte, and Zarah Vernham. 2017. “Getting Closer Tot He Action: Using Virtual Environments to Understand Burglary.” Deviant Behavior. (Special Issue on Visual Methods).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, Linda K., and Bengt O. Muthén. 1998–2015. Mplus User’s Guide: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables: User’ss Guide. Seventh Edition. Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, Daniel S. 2007. “Moving Choice to Center Stage in Criminological Research and Theory: The American Society of Criminology 2006 Sutherland Address.” Criminology 45 (2):259–72. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00078.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, Daniel S. and Raymond Paternoster. 1993. “Enduring Individual Differences and Rational Choice Theories of Crime.” Law and Society Review 27:467–96. doi:10.2307/3054102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, Daniel S. and Raymond Paternoster. 1994. “Personal Capital and Social Control: The Deterrence Implications of a Theory of Individual Differences in Criminal Offending.” Criminology 32:581–606. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01166.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagin, Daniel S. and Greg Pogarsky. 2001. “Integrating Celerity, Impulsivity, and Extralegal Sanction Threats into a Model of General Deterrence: Theory and Evidence.” Criminology 39:865–92. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00943.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, Brian and Antony S. Manstead. 1993. “Making Sense of Emotion in Stories and Social Life.” Cognition & Emotion 7 (3–4):295–323. doi:10.1080/02699939308409191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piquero, Alex and Stephen Tibbetts. 1996. “Specifying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Low Self-Control and Situational Factors in Offenders’ Decision Making: Toward a More Complete Model of Rational Offending.” Justice Quarterly 13:481–510. doi:10.1080/07418829600093061.
   Google Scholar
• Regenbrecht, Holger and Thomas Schubert. 2002. “Real and Illusory Interactions Enhance Presence in Virtual Environments.” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11:425–34. doi:10.1162/105474602760204318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynald, Danielle M. 2009. “Guardianship in Action: Developing a New Tool for Measurement.” Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 11 (1):1–20. doi:10.1057/cpcs.2008.19.
   Google Scholar
• Reynald, Danielle M. 2010. “Guardians on Guardianship: Factors Affecting the Willingness to Monitor, the Ability to Detect Potential Offenders & the Willingness to Intervene.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 47 (3):358–90. doi:10.1177/0022427810365904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynald, Danielle M. 2011a. “Factors Associated with the Guardianship of Places: Assessing the Relative Importance of the Spatio-Physical and Socio-Demographic Contexts in Generating Opportunities for Capable Guardianship.” Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency 48 (1):110–42. doi:10.1177/0022427810384138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynald, Danielle M. 2011b. Guarding against Crime: Measuring Guardianship within Routine Activity Theory. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rucker, Derek D., Kristopher J. Preacher, Zakary L. Tormala, and Richard E. Petty. 2011. “Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 5 (6):359–71. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x.
   Google Scholar
• Schoepfer, Andrea and Alex R. Piquero. 2006. “Self-Contol, Moral Beliefs, and Criminal Activity.” Deviant Behavior 27 (1):51–71. doi:10.1080/016396290968326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, Thomas and Jan Crusius. 2002. “Five Theses on the Book Problem: Presence in Books, Film and VR.” Pp. 53–59 in PRESENCE 2002-Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on PRESENCE. Porto, Portugal: Universidad Fernando Pessoa.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout, Patrick E. and Niall Bolger. 2002. “Mediation in Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies: New Procedures and Recommendations.” Psychological Methods 7 (4):422. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, Mel. 2004. “How Colorful Was You Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments.” Presence 13 (4):484–93. doi:10.1162/1054746041944849.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, Mel, Angus Antley, Adam Davison, David Swapp, Christhop Guger, Chris Barker, Nancy Pistrang, and Maria V. Sanchez-Vives. 2006. “A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments.” PLoS One 1 (1):e39. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bommel, Marco, Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, Henk Elffers, A.M. Paul, and Van Lange. 2014. “Intervene to Be Seen: The Power of a Camera in Attenuating the Bystander Effect.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 5 (4):459–66. doi:10.1177/1948550613507958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, Jean-Louis and Reinout E. De Vries. 2012. “Traits and States: Integrating Personality and Affect into a Model of Criminal Decision Making.” Criminology 50 (3):637–71. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, Jean-Louis and Reinout E. De Vries. 2014. “Rational Misbehavior? Evaluating an Integrated Dual-Process Model of Criminal Decision Making.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 30 (1):1–27. doi:10.1007/s10940-012-9192-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, Jean-Louis, Henk Elffers, D. Reynald, and D. Nagin. 2013. “Introduction: Affect and Cognition in Criminal Decision Making: Between Rational Choices and Lapses of Self- Control.” in Affect and Cognition in Criminal Decision Making, edited by J. L. van Gelder, H. Elffers, D. Reynald, and D. Nagin. Abingdon: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, Jean-Louis, Claire Nee, Marco Otte, Andrew Demetriou, Iris van Sintemaartensdijk, and Jan-Willem van Prooijen. 2017. “Virtual Burglary: Exploring the Potential of Virtual Reality to Study Burglary in Action.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 54:29–62. doi:10.1177/0022427816663997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, Jean-Louis, Marco Otte, and Eva C. Luciano. 2014. “Using Virtual Reality in Criminological Research.” Crime Science 3 (1):1. doi:10.1186/s40163-014-0010-5.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, Jean-Louis and Stijn Van Daele. 2014. “Innovative Data Collection Methods in Criminological Research: Editorial Introduction.” Crime Science 3 (1):6. doi:10.1186/s40163-014-0006-1.
   Google Scholar