Workplace Deviance Investigations: A Case Study of the Application of Maturity Model to a University Investigation

References

• Antonsen, T. and T. Løkling. 2020. “Fremgangsmåten forsterker konflikter (The procedure strengthens conflicts).” Daily Norwegian Business Newspaper Dagens Næringsliv www.dn.no,publishedJuly28.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G., M. Button, and K. Frimpong. 2009. “Policing Fraud in the Private Sector: A Survey of the FTSE 100 Companies in the UK.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 11(4):493–504. doi:10.1350/ijps.2009.11.4.140.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M. 2020. “The “New” Private Security Industry, the Private Policing of Cyberspace and the Regulatory Questions.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 36(1):39–55. doi:10.1177/1043986219890194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, M., K. Frimpong, G. Smith, and L. Johnston. 2007. “Professionalizing Counter Fraud Specialists in the UK: Assessing Progress and Recommendations for Reform.” Crime Prevention and Community Safety 9(2):92–101. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8150037.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M. and J. Gee. 2013. Countering Fraud for Competitive Advantage – the Professional Approach to Reducing the Last Great Hidden Cost. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., L. Johnston, K. Frimpong, and G. Smith. 2007. “New Directions in Policing Fraud: The Emergence of the Counter Fraud Specialists in the United Kingdom.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 35(4):192–208. doi:10.1016/j.ijsl.2007.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M., R. Kapend, and P. Stiernsted. 2022. “Investigative Private Policing Beyond the Police: An Exploratory Study.” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice 15(4):2111–13. ( published online). doi:10.108/10439463.2022.2071894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, M., C. M. Nicholls, J. Kerr, and R. Owen. 2015. “Online Fraud Victims in England and Wales: Victims‘ Views on Sentencing and the Opportunity for Restorative Justice.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 54(2):193–211. doi:10.1111/hojo.12123.
   Google Scholar
• Button, M. and P. Stiernstedt. 2017. “The Evolution of Security Industry Regulation in the European Union.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 41(4):245–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, M. and P. Stiernstedt. 2018. “Comparing Private Security Regulation in the European Union.” Policing and Society 28(4):398–414. doi:10.1080/10439463.2016.1161624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilchert, S., D. S. Ones, R. D. Davis, and C. D. Rostow. 2007. “Cognitive Ability Predicts Objectively Measured Counterproductive Work Behaviors.” Journal of Applied Psychology 92(3):616–27. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, N., J. D. Wise, and H. N. Brehm. 2022. “Following Heavenly Orders: Heroic Deviance and the Denial of Responsibility in Narratives of Rescue.” Deviant Behavior 43(11):1385–405. doi:10.1080/01639625.2021.1983738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, E. 1991. “Positive Deviance: A Viable Concept?” Deviant Behavior 12(3):289–309. doi:10.1080/01639625.1991.9967880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. 2016. “Private Policing of Financial Crime: Key Issues in the Investigation Business in Norway.” European Journal of Policing Studies 3(3):292–314. doi:10.5553/EJPS/2034760X2016003003003.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. 2017. “Private Police Legitimacy: The Case of Internal Investigations by Fraud Examiners.” Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 40(3):628–40. doi:10.1108/PIJPSM-04-2016-0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. 2018. “Blame Game in Private Investigation Reports: The Case of Deloitte Examination at Telenor VimpelCom.” Journal of Investigative Psychology & Offender Profiling 15(2):99–108. doi:10.1002/jip.1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. 2019. “Evaluation of Fraud Examinations: The Case of Inappropriate Accounting Practices at Fuji Xerox.” Deviant Behavior 40(11):1421–27. doi:10.1080/01639625.2018.1559640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. 2020. “Private Policing of White-Collar Crime: Case Studies of Internal Investigations by Fraud Examiners.” Police Practice & Research 21(6):717–38. doi:10.1080/15614263.2020.1789461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. 2021. Private Policing of Economic Crime – Case Studies of Internal Investigations by Fraud Examiners. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. 2023. Fraud Examinations in White-Collar Crime Investigations. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. and C. Hamerton. 2023. Lawyer Roles in Knowledge Work: Defender, Enabler, Investigator. UK: Intersentia publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. and M. Tcherni-Buzzeo. 2016. “Reasons for Gaps in Crime Reporting: The Case of White-Collar Criminals Investigated by Private Fraud Examiners in Norway.” Deviant Behavior 38(3):267–81. doi:10.1080/01639625.2016.1196993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren, A. and T. J. Trædal (2022). Ledende Forsker Ved Rettsmedisin Sa Opp Etter å Ha Varslet (Leading Forensic Scientist Resigned After Giving Notice), Daily Norwegian Newspaper Aftenposten, Retrieved December 9 www.aftenposten.no.
   Google Scholar
• Iannacci, F., A. P. Seepma, C. Blok, and A. Resca. 2019. “Reappraising Maturity Models in E-Government Research: The Trajectory-Turning Point Theory.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28(3):310–29. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jebens, A. and H. Dorans (2019). Utfordringer ved faktaundersøkelser (Challenges at facts investigations), lawyer association Juristforbundet, Retrieved March 18 www.juristforbundet.no.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, L., M. Button, and T. Williamson. 2008. “Police, Governance and the Private Finance Initiative.” Policing & Society 18(3):225–44. doi:10.1080/10439460802028999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M. 2020a. “Financial Fraud Investigative Interviewing – Corporate investigators’ Beliefs and Practices: A Qualitative Inquiry.” Journal of Financial Crime 28(2):345–58. ( published online). doi:10.1108/JFC-08-2020-0158.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. 2020b. “Out of Obscurity: The Contemporary Private Investigator in Australia.” International Journal of Police Science & Management 22(3):285–96. doi:10.1177/1461355720931887.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. 2020c. “Private Investigation into Economic Crime: Regulation of a Multidisciplinary Field.” Journal of Applied Security Research 16(4):470–89. ( published online). doi:10.1080/19361610.2020.1832018.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. 2020d. “What Makes a Successful Corporate Investigator: An Exploration of Private Investigators Attributes.” Journal of Financial Crime 27(3):701–14. doi:10.1108/JFC-02-2020-0019.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. 2021a. Pathways and Partnerships: A Study of Private Policing Economic Crime in Australia, Dissertation Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, School of Justice. Australia: Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. 2021b. “Profiting from a Tainted Trade: Private investigators’ Views on the Popular Culture Glamorisation of Their Trade.” Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice 7(2):112–25. ( published online). doi:10.1108/JCRPP-07-2020-0050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerø, M. (2021). Dropp faktaundersøkelser (Skip facts investigations), web-based media Dagens Perspektiv, Retrieved May 31. www.dagensperspektiv.no.
   Google Scholar
• Lilli, M. and L. Sunde. 2023. “Rapport vedrørende påstander om kritikkverdige forhold (Report regarding allegations of objectionable conditions).” Pp. 49 pages in CMS Kluge Advokatfirma, Bryggegata, Vol. 6. 0250 Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Meerts, C. 2014. “Empirical Case Studies of Corporate Security in International Perspective.” in Pp. 97–115 in Corporate Security in the 21st Century – Theory and Practice in International Perspective, edited by K. Walby and R.K. Lippert. Palgrave Macmillan, UK: Hampshire
   Google Scholar
• Meerts, C. 2020. “Corporate Investigations: Beyond Notions of Public-Private Relations.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 36(1):86–100. doi:10.1177/1043986219890202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meerts, C. 2021. “Struggles in Cooperation: Public-Private Relations in the Investigation of Internal Financial Crime in the Netherlands.” Pp. 175–186 in European White-Collar Crime: Exploring the Nature of European Realities, edited by N. Lord, E. Inzelt, W. Huisman, and R. Faria. UK: Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meerts, C. A. 2018. “The Organization as the Cure for Its Own Ailments: Corporate Investigators in the Netherlands.” Administrative Sciences 8(25):1–15. doi:10.3390/admsci8030025.
   Google Scholar
• Meerts, C. A. 2019. Corporate Investigations, Corporate Justice and Public-Private Relations: Towards a New Conceptualisation. Switzerland: Springer Nature, Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Michalak, R. and N. M. Ashkanasy. 2013. “Emotions and Deviances.” 19–49 in Deviant and Criminal Behavior in the Workplace, edited by S.M. Elias. NY, New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordrik, B. and T.Ø. Kuldova. 2021. Faktaundersøkelser – Et «hybrid konfliktvåpen» på Norske Arbeidsplasser (Facts Investigations – a «hybrid Conflict weapon» at Norwegian Workplaces). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, A., P. Bergemann, and W. Helms. 2023. “Getting Away with It (Or Not): The Social Control of Organizational Deviance.” Academy of Management Review published online at the journal website. 10.5465/amr.2021.0066.
   Google Scholar
• Röglinger, M., J. Pöppelbuss, and J. Becker. 2012. “Maturity Model in Business Process Management.” Business Process Management Journal 18(2):328–46. doi:10.1108/14637151211225225.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. 2006. “Privatizing Economic Crime Enforcement: Exploring the Role of Private Sector Investigative Agencies in Combating Money Laundering.” Policing & Society 16(3):285–312. doi:10.1080/10439460600812065.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, R., M. A. Abernethy, and C. Y. Hung. 2020. “Group Identity, Performance Transparency, and Employee Performance.” The Accounting Review 95(5):373–97. doi:10.2308/accr-52652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slettemark, G. and H. Kvamme (2022). Arbeidsmiljøsaker bør tas ut av varslingsordningen (Working environment matters should be removed from the notification system), daily Norwegian business newspaper Dagens Næringsliv, Retrieved June 7 www.dn.no.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, O. and T. Raymen. 2018. “Deviant Leisure: A Criminological Perspective.” Theoretical Criminology 22(1):63–82. doi:10.1177/1362480616660188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solli-Sæther, H. and P. Gottschalk. 2015. “Stages-Of-Growth in Outsourcing, Offshoring and Backsourcing: Back to the Future?” Journal of Computer Information Systems 55(2):88–94. doi:10.1080/08874417.2015.11645760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topdahl, R. C. and S. A. S. Akhtar (2018). Rapporten Som Endret Alt (The Report That Changed Everything), Norwegian Public Broadcasting NRK, published December 1. www.nrk.no.
   Google Scholar
• Trædal, T. (2021). Forskere Mener Faktaundersøkelser Er Farlige (Researchers Claim Facts Investigations are Dangerous), Web-Based News Media Khrono, Retrieved April 28 www.khrono,no.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. W. 2005a. “Governability Matters: The Private Policing of Economic Crime and the Challenge of Democratic Governance.” Policing & Society 15(2):187–211. doi:10.1080/10439460500071671.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. W. 2005b. “Reflections on the Private versus Public Policing of Economic Crime.” The British Journal of Criminology 45(3):316–39. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. D. 2020. “Private Policing and Public Health: A Neglected Relationship.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 36(1):19–38. doi:10.1177/1043986219890191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar