Interspecific interference in the closely related predatory mites Neoseiulus womersleyi and Neoseiulus longispinosus (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

References

• Amano H, Chant DA. 1978. Mating behavior and reproductive mechanisms of two species of predacious mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Acarologia. 20:196–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arimoto M, Satoh M, Uesugi R, Osakabe M. 2012. DNA preparation method in eggs, immature stages, and diapausing females of Tetranychus spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) for diagnostic PCR-RFLP. Appl Entomol Zool. 47:295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arimoto M, Satoh M, Uesugi R, Osakabe M. 2013. PCR-RFLP analysis for identification of Tetranychus spider mite species (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Econ Entomol. 106:661–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avila FW, Sirot LK, LaFlamme BA, Rubinstein CD, Wolfner MF. 2011. Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function. Annu Rev Entomol. 56:21–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David T, Gerson U, Morin S. 2009. Asymmetric reproductive interference between two closely related spider mites: Tetranychus urticae and T. turkestani (Acari: Tetranychidae). ‎Exp Appl Acarol. 48:213–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterino MS, Cho S, Sperling FA. 2000. The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving Tower of Babel. Annu Rev Entomol. 45:1–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chant DA, McMurtry JA. 2007. Illustrated keys and diagnoses for the genera and subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the world (Acari: Mesostigmata). West Bloomfield (MI): Indira Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Congdon BD, McMurtry JA. 1986. The distribution and taxonomic relationships of Euseius quetzali McMurtry in California (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Int J Acarol. 12:7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Demite PR, McMurtry JA, de Moraes GJ. 2014. Phytoseiidae database: a website for taxonomic and distributional information on phytoseiid mites (Acari). Zootaxa. 3795:571–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotoh T, Araki R, Boubou A, Migeon A, Ferragut F, Navajas M. 2009. Evidence of co-specificity between Tetranychus evansi and Tetranychus takafujii (Acari: Prostigmata, Tetranychidae): comments on taxonomic and agricultural aspects. Int J Acarol. 35:485–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotoh T, Gutierrez J, Navajas M. 1998. Molecular comparison of the sibling species Tetranychus pueraricola Ehara and Gotoh and T. urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Entomol Sci. 1:55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gotoh T, Tsuchiya A. 2008. Effect of multiple mating on reproduction and longevity of the phytoseiid mite Neoseiulus californicus. Exp Appl Acarol. 44:185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gröning J, Lücke N, Finger A, Hochkirch A. 2007. Reproductive interference in two ground-hopper species: testing hypotheses of coexistence in the field. Oikos. 116:1449–1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinomoto N, Takafuji A. 2001. Genetic diversity and phylogeny in the Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kanzawai, in Japan. Exp Appl Acarol. 25:355–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CC, Lo KC, Chen WH. 1995. Comparative biology, reproductive compatibility, and geographical distribution of Amblyseius longispinosus and A. womersleyi (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ Entomol. 24:601–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Bücker A. 2007. Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol. 76:633–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konuma J, Chiba S. 2007. Ecological character displacement caused by reproductive interference. J Theor Biol. 247:354–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SS, de Barro PJ, Xu J, Luan JB, Zang LS, Ruan YM, Wan FH. 2007. Asymmetric mating interactions drive widespread invasion and displacement in a whitefly. Science. 318:1769–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda T, Hinomoto N, Singh RN, Gotoh T. 2012. Molecular-based identification and phylogeny of Oligonychus species (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Econ Entomol. 105:1043–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLain DK, Shure DJ. 1987. Pseudocompetition: interspecific displacement of insect species through misdirected courtship. Oikos. 49:291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtry JA, de Moraes GJ, Sourassou FN. 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. ‎Syst Appl Acarol . 18:297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monetti LN, Croft BA. 1997. Mating, cross-mating and related behaviours of Neoseiulus californnicus and Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 21:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navajas M, Boursot P. 2003. Nuclear ribosomal DNA monophyly versus mitochondrial DNA polyphyly in two closely related mite species: the influence of life history and molecular drive. Proc Biol Sci. 270:S124–S127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navajas M, Gutierrez J, Bonato O, Bolland HR, Mapangou-Divassa S. 1994. Intraspecific diversity of the Cassava Green Mite Mononychellus progresivus (Acari: Tetranychidae) using comparisons of mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences and cross-breeding. Exp Appl Acarol. 18:351–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osakabe M, Kotsubo Y, Tajima R, Hinomoto N. 2008. Restriction fragment length polymorphism catalog for molecular identification of Japanese Tetranychus spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). J Econ Entomol. 101:1167–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrot-Minnot MJ, Lagnel J, Migeon A, Navajas M. 2000. Tracking paternal genes with DALP markers in a pseudoarrhenotokous reproductive system: biparental transmission but haplodiploid-like inheritance in the mite Neoseiulus californicus. Heredity. 84:702–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyer HU. 2008. Mating with the wrong species can be right. Trends Ecol Evol. 23:289–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelis MW, Nagelkerke CJ, Breeuwer AJ. 2002. Sex ratio control in arrhenotokous and pseudo-arrhenotokous mites. In: Hardy ICW, editor. Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 235–253.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. 2010. SAS Enterprise Guide 9.3. Cary (NC): SAS Institute SAS Campus Drive.
   Google Scholar
• Schulten GGM. 1985. Pseudo-arrhenotoky. In: Helle W, Sabelis MW, editors. Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies, and control. World Crop Pests Vol. 1B. Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Singer F. 1990. Reproductive costs arising from incomplete habitat segregation among three species of Leucorrhinia dragonflies. Behaviour. 115:188–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takafuji A, Kuno E, Fujimotoa H. 1997. Reproductive interference and its consequences for the competitive interactions between two closely related Panonychus spider mites. Exp Appl Acarol. 21:379–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thum RA. 2007. Reproductive interference, priority effects and the maintenance of parapatry in Skistodiaptomus copepods. Oikos. 116:759–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyoshima S, Amano H. 1999. Cytological evidence of pseudo-arrhenotoky in two phytoseiid mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Amblyseius womersleyi Schicha. J Acarol Soc Jap. 8:135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah MS, Sugimoto R, Kongchuensin M, Konvipasruang P, Gotoh T. 2017. Copulation duration, sperm transfer and reproduction of the two closely related phytoseiid mites, Neoseiulus womersleyi and Neoseiulus longispinosus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol. 71:47-61.
   Google Scholar
• Verrel PA. 1994. Is decreased frequency of mating among conspecifics a cost of sympatry in salamanders? Evolution. 48:921–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer A, Schausberger P. 2014. Canalization of body size matters for lifetime reproductive success of male predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biol J Linnean Soc. 111:889–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar