Behavioural responses of females of the eriophyoid mite, Aculops allotrichus, to the presence of injured conspecifics

References

• Amrine JW, Stasny TA. 1994. Catalog of the Eriophyoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata) of the World. West Bloomfield: Indira Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Arshamian A, Laska M, Gordon AR, Norberg M, Lahger C, Porada DK, Serra NJ, Johansson E, Schaefer M, Amundin M, et al. 2017. A mammalian blood odor component serves as an approach-avoidance cue across phylum border - from flies to humans. Scientific Report. 7:13635. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13361-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaazer CJH, Villacis-Perez E, Chafi R, Van Leeuwen T, Kant MR, Schimmel BCJ. 2018. Why do herbivorous mites suppress plant defenses? Frontiers in Plant Science. 9:1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvet ÉC, Lima DB, Melo JWS, Gondim JMGC. 2018. Chemosensory cues of predators and competitors influence search for refuge in fruit by the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 74:249–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardé RT. 2014. Defining attraction and aggregation pheromones: teleological versus functional perspectives. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 40:519–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagnoli M, Laffi F. 1985. Aculops allotrichus (Acarina: Eriophyoidea) injurious to Robinia pseudoacacia. Details of biology and systematics. Redia. 68:251–260.
   Google Scholar
• Chivers DP, Dixson DL, White JR, McCormick MI, Ferrari MCO. 2013. Degradation of chemical alarm cues and assessment of risk throughout the day. Ecology and Evolution. 3:3925–3934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers DP, Smith RJF. 1998. Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: a review and prospectus. Écoscience. 5:338–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalesman S, Rundle SD, Bilton DT, Cotton PA. 2007. Phylogenetic relatedness and ecological interactions determine antipredator behavior. Ecology. 88:2462–2467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lillo E, Pozzebon AL, Valenzano D, Duso C. 2018. An intimate relationship between eriophyoid mites and their host plants – a review. Frontiers in Plant Science. 9:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias CR, Bernardo AMG, Mencalha J, Freitas CWC, Sarmento RA, Pallini A, Janssen A. 2016. Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 69:263–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicke M, Grostal P. 2001. Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 32:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Downes S, Hoefer AM. 2004. Antipredatory behaviour in lizards: interactions between group size and predation risk. Animal Behaviour. 67:485–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari MCO, Wisenden BD, Chivers DP. 2010. Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectusThe present review is one in the special series of reviews on animal–plant interactions. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 88:698–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glas JJ, Alba JM, Simoni S, Villarroel CA, Stoops M, Schimmel BCJ, Schuurink RC, Sabelis MW, Kant MR. 2014. Defense suppression benefits herbivores that have a monopoly on their feeding site but can backfire within natural communities. BMC Biology. 12:98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grand TC, Dill LM. 1999. The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition? Animal Behaviour. 58:443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grostal P, Dicke M. 1999. Direct and indirect cues of predation risk influence behavior and reproduction of prey: a case for acarine interactions. Behavioral Ecology. 10:422–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grostal P, Dicke M. 2000. Recognising one’s enemies: a functional approach to risk assessment by prey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 47:258–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen NT, Andersen A, Stabell OB. 2002. Alarm responses of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, induced by chemically labeled durophagous predators and simulated acts of predation. Marine Biology. 140:365–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huryn AD, Chivers DO. 1999. Contrasting behavioural responses by detritivorous and predatory mayflies to chemicals released by injured conspecifics and their predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 25:2729–2740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kats LB, Dill LM. 1998. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Écoscience. 5:361–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keifer HH. 1975. Injurious eriophyoid mites. In: Jeppson LR, Keifer HH, Baker EW, editors. Mites injurious to economic plants. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 397–547.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy JS. 1978. The concepts of olfactory ‘arrestment’ and ‘attraction’. Physiological Entomology. 3:91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiedrowicz A, Kuczyński L, Lewandowski M, Proctor H, Skoracka A. 2017. Behavioural responses to potential dispersal cues in eriophyid mites. Scientific Report. 7:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kierat J, Filipiak M, Szentgyörgyi H, Woyciechowski M. 2017. Predation cues in solitary bee nests. Journal of Insect Behavior. 30:385–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesch S, Dicke M. 1997. Avoidance of predatory mites by the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae: the role of infochemicals. Proceedings of the Section Experimental and Applied Entomology of the Netherlands Entomological Society. Amsterdam. 8:121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Lima SL, Dill LM. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 68:619–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy TM, Fisher WA. 2000. Multiple predator-avoidance behaviours of the freshwater snail Physella heterostropha pomila: responses vary with risk. Freshwater Biology. 44:387–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtry JA, Croft BA. 1997. Life styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles as biological control agents. Annual Review of Entomology. 42:291–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurtry JA, de Moraes GJ, Sourassou NF. 2013. Revision of the lifestyles of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and implications for biological control strategies. Systematic and Applied Acarology. 18:297–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo JWS, Lima DB, Sabelis MW, Pallini A, Gondim MGC. 2014a. Limits to ambulatory displacement of coconut mites in absence and presence of food-related cues. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 62:449–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo JWS, Lima DB, Sabelis MW, Pallini A, Gondim MGC. 2014b. Host finding behaviour of the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 64:445–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuthen D, Flege P, Brandt R, Thünken T. 2018. The location of damage-released alarm cues in a cichlid fish. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 19:529–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K. 1999. Guarding and spermatophore deposition in the free-living eriophyid mite Vasates robiniae Nalepa. Behaviour. 136:899–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K. 2003. Climbing of leaf trichomes by eriophyid mites impedes their location by predators. Journal of Insect Behavior. 16:833–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K. 2014. Repeated visitations of spermatophores and polyandry in females of eriophyoid mites. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 62:463–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K. 2016. The effect of predation risk on spermatophore deposition rate of the eriophyoid mite, Aculops allotrichus. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 68:145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K, Boczek J. 1991. Sexual behaviour of males attracted to quiescent deutomymphs in the Eriophyoidea (Acari). In: Dusbabek F, Bukva V, editors. Modern acarology. Vol. 2. Praque: Academia. p. 549–553.
   Google Scholar
• Michalska K, Skoracka A, Navia D, Amrine Jr JW. 2010. Behavioural studies on eriophyoid mites: an overview. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 51:31–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K, Studnicki M. 2013. The effect of the presence of quiescent female nymphs, males and their spermatophores on spermatophore placement in two species of eriophyoid mites. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 60:433–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K, Tomczyk A, Łotocka B, Orzechowski S, Studnicki M. 2019. Oviposition by the vagrant eriophyoid mite Aculops allotrichus on leaves of black locust tree, Robinia pseudoacacia. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 79:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell MD, Bairos-Novak KR, Ferrari MCO. 2017. Mechanisms underlying the control of responses to predator odours in aquatic prey. Journal of Experimental Biology. 220:1937–1946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oku K, Yano S, Osakabe M, Takafuji A. 2003a. Spider mites assess predation risk by using the odor of injured conspecifics. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 29:2609–2613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield GN. 1996. Diversity and host plant specificity. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing. p. 195–216. World Crop Pests, Vol 6.
   Google Scholar
• Oku K, Yano S, Takafuji A. 2003b. Spider mite’s use of a refuge during the quiescent stage in the presence of a predator. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata. 108:71–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Shipp L, Buitenhuis R. 2010. Predation, development, and oviposition by the predatory mite Amblyuseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Tomato Russet Mite (Acari: Eriophyidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 103:563–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacor SD. 2003. Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment. Oikos. 100:409–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persons MH, Walker SE, Rypstra AL. 2002. Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behavioral Ecology. 13:386–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestana JLT, Baird DJ, Soares AMVM. 2013. Predator threat assessment in Daphnia magna: the role of kairomones versus conspecific alarm cues. Marine & Freshwater Research. 64:679–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2017. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades DF. 1985. Offensive-defensive interactions between herbivores and plants: their relevance in herbivore population dynamics and ecological theory. American Naturalist. 125:205–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelis MW. 1996. Phytoseiidae. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing. p. 427–456. World Crop Pests, Vol 6.
   Google Scholar
• Sabelis MW, Bruin J. 1996. Evolutionary ecology: life history patterns, food plant choice and dispersal. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing. p. 329–366. World Crop Pests, Vol 6.
   Google Scholar
• Sabelis MW, van Rhijn PCJ. 1996. Eriophyoid mites as alternative prey. In: Lindquist EE, Sabelis MW, Bruin J, editors. Eriophyoid mites: their biology, natural enemies and control. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishing. p. 757–764. World Crop Pests, Vol 6.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeppner NM, Relyea RA. 2005. Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecology Letters. 8:505–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeppner NM, Relyea RA. 2009. Interpreting the smells of predation: how alarm cues and kairomones induce different prey defences: unravelling the chemical cues of predation. Functional Ecology. 23:1114–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehr EK, Gall BG. 2016. Responses of an aquatic isopod and amphipod to chemical alarm cues from damaged conspecifics. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 31:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sih A. 1987. Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WCH, Sih A, editors. Direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Hannover and London: University Press of New England. p. 203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Škaloudová B, Zemek R, Krivan V. 2007. The effect of predation risk on an acarine system. Animal Behaviour. 74:813–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensmyr MC, Maderspacher F. 2012. Pheromones: fish fear factor. Current Biology. 22:183–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Q, Chen G, Mescher MC, Peng ZK, Xie W, Wang SL, Wu QJ, Liu J, Li CR, Wang WK, et al. 2018. Whitefly aggregation on tomato is mediated by feeding-induced changes in plant metabolites that influence the behaviour and performance of conspecifics. Functional Ecology. 32:1180–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summey MR, Mathis A. 1998. Alarm responses to chemical stimuli from damaged conspecifics by larval anurans: tests of neotropical species. Herpetologica. 54:402–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashiro H. 1967. Self-watering acrylic cages for confining insects and mites on detached leaves. Journal of Economic Entomology. 60:354–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner AM. 1997. Contrasting short-term and long-term effects of predation risk on consumer habitat use and resources. Behavioral Ecology. 8:120–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzano D, Bari G, Malagnini V, de Lillo E. 2019. Off‐host survival of Eriophyoidea and remarks on their dispersal modes. Experimental & Applied Acarology. 79:21–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisenden BD. 2015. Chemical cues that indicate risk of predation. In: Soresnen PW, Wisende BD, editors. Fish pheromones and related cues. Ames (USA): Wiley. p. 131–148.
   Google Scholar