Does environmental disturbance also influence within-stream beta diversity of macroinvertebrate assemblages in tropical streams?

References

• Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 35:257–284.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shami SA, Heino J, Che Salmah MR, Ahmad AH, Hamid SA, Madrus MR. 2013. Drivers of beta diversity of macroinvertebrate communities in tropical forest streams. Freshwater Biol. 58:1126–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angermeier PL, Schlosser IJ. 1989. Species-area relationships for stream fishes. Ecology. 70:1450–1642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage PD, Cannan CE. 1998. Nested multi-scale surveys in lotic systems-tools for management. In: Bretschko G, Helesic J, editors. Advances in river bottom ecology. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers. p. 293–314.
   Google Scholar
• Baptista DF, Buss DF, Egler M, Giovanelli A, Silveira MP, Nessimian JL. 2007. A multimetric index based on benthic macroinvertebrates for evaluation of Atlantic Forest streams at Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Hydrobiologia. 575:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baselga A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 19:134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Baselga A, Orme CDL. 2012. Betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol Evol. 3:808–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisel JN, Usseglio-Polatera P, Thomas S, Moreteau JC. 1998. Stream community structure in relation to spatial variation: the influence of mesohabitat characteristics. Hydrobiologia. 389:73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyero L, Ramírez A, Dudgeon D, Pearson RG. 2009. Are tropical streams really different? J North Am. Benthological Soc. 28:397–403.
   Google Scholar
• Buendia C, Gibbins CN, Vericat D, Batalla RJ, Douglas A. 2013. Detecting the structural and functional impacts of fine sediment on stream invertebrates. Ecol Indic. 25:184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss DF, Carlisle DM, Chon TS, Culp J, Harding JS, Keizer-Vlek HE, Robinson WA, Strachan S, Thirion C, Hugles RM. 2015. Stream biomonitoring using macroinvertebrates around the globe: a comparison of large-scale programs. Environ Monit Assess. 187:4132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly N, Pearson RG. 2007. The effect of fine sedimentation on tropical stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: a comparison using flow-through artificial stream channels and recirculating mesocosms. Hydrobiologia. 592:423–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbi JJ, Trivinho-Strixino S. 2006. Influence of taxonomic resolution of stream macroinvertebrate communities on the evaluation of different land uses. Acta Limnol Bras. 18:469–475.
   Google Scholar
• Costa SS, Melo A. 2008. Beta diversity in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages: among-site and among-microhabitat components. Hydrobiologia. 598:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, et al. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 81:163–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugère V, Kasangaki A, Chapman LJ. 2016. Land use changes in an afrotropical biodiversity hotspot affect stream alpha and beta diversity. Ecosphere. 7:e01355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia GJ, Antonello SL, Magalhães MGM. 2006. The environmental atlas of the Corumbatai Watershed SP, Brazil. Rev Bras Cartogr. 58:73–79.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez‐Cánovas C, Millán A, Velasco J, Vaughan IP, Ormerod SJ. 2013. Contrasting effects of natural and anthropogenic stressors on beta diversity in river organisms. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 22:796–805.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison ET, Norris RH, Wilkinson SN. 2007. The impact of fine sediment accumulation on benthic macroinvertebrates: implications for river management. In: Wilson AL, Dehaan RL, Watts RJ, Page KJ, Browmer KH, Curtis A, editors. Proceedings of the 5th Australian Stream Management Conference. Australian Rivers: Making a Difference. Thurgoona (AUS): Charles Sturt University. p. 139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins CP, Mykrä H, Oksanen J, Vander Laan JJ. 2015. Environmental disturbance can increase beta diversity of stream macroinvertebrate assemblages. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 24:483–494.
   Google Scholar
• Heino J, Louhi P, Muotka T. 2004. Identifying the scales of variability in stream macroinvertebrate abundance, functional composition and assemblage structure. Freshwater Biol. 49:1230–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Melo AS, Bini LM, Altermatt F, Al-Shami AS, Angeler DG, Bonada N, Brand C, Callisto M, Cottenie K, et al. 2015. A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels. Ecol Evol. 5:1235–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Soininen J. 2007. Are higher taxa adequate surrogates for species-level assemblage patterns and species richness in stream organisms? Biol Conserv. 137:78–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Soininen J. 2010. Are common species sufficient in describing turnover in aquatic metacommunities along environmental and spatial gradients? Limnol Oceanogr. 55:2397–2402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg I, Norris R. 1991. Effects of runoff from land clearing and urban development on the distribution and abundance of macroinvertebrates in pool areas of a river. Mar Freshwater Res. 42:507–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwata T, Nakano S, Inoue M. 2003. Impacts of past riparian deforestation on stream communities in a tropical rain forest in Borneo. Ecol Appl. 13:461–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson CR, Leigh DS, Scarbrough SL, Chamblee JF. 2015. Herbaceous versus forested riparian vegetation: narrow and simple versus wide, woody and diverse stream habitat. River Res Appl. 31:847–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janke H, Trivinho-Strixino S. 2007. Colonization of leaf litter by aquatic macroinvertebrates: A study in a low order tropical stream. Acta Limnol Bras. 19:109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson RK, Angeler DG. 2014. Effects of agricultural land use on stream assemblages: Taxon-specific responses of alpha and beta diversity. Ecol Indic. 45:386–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost L. 2007. Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. Ecology. 88(10):2427–2439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ. 2005. Simpson diversity and the Shannon-Wiener index as special cases of a generalized entropy. Oikos. 109:203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koleff P, Gaston KJ, Lennon JJ. 2003. Measuring beta diversity for presence-absence data. J Anim Ecol. 72:367–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake PS. 2000. Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc. 19:573–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P. 2014. Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 23:1324–1334.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney KO, Munguia P, Mitchell RM. 2011. Anthropogenic disturbance and landscape patterns affect diversity patterns of aquatic benthic macroinvertebrates. J N Am Benthol Soc. 30:284–295.
   Google Scholar
• Matthaei CD, Peacock PA, Townsend CR. 1999. Scour and fill patterns in a New Zealand stream andpotential implications for invertebrate refugia. Freshwater Biol. 42:41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes AB, Wilhelm AE, Boelter T, Stenert C, Schulz UH, Maltchik L. 2014. Reduced riparian zone width compromises aquatic macroinvertebrate communitiesin streams of Southern Brazil. Environ Monit Assess. 186:7063–7074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mykrä H, Heino J, Oksanen J, Muotka T. 2011. The stability–diversity relationship in stream macroinvertebrates: influences of sampling effects and habitat complexity. Freshwater Biol. 56:1122–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiman RJ, Décamps H. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian Zones. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 28:621–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passy SI, Blanchet FG. 2007. Algal communities in human-impacted stream ecosystems suffer beta-diversity decline. Divers Distrib. 13:670–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podani J, Ricotta C, Schmera D. 2013. A general framework for analyzing beta diversity, nestedness and related community-level phenomena based on abundance data. Ecol Complex. 15:52–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle CM, Benstead JP. 2001. Effects of logging on tropical river ecosystems. In: Fimbel RA, Grahal A, Robinson J, editors. The cutting edge: conserving wildlife in logged tropical forests. New York (NY): Columbia University Press. p. 305–325.
   Google Scholar
• Pusey BJ, Arthington AH. 2003. Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: A review. Mar Freshwater Res. 54:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reid DJ, Lake PS, Quinn GP. 2013. Influences of agricultural landuse and seasonal changes in abiotic conditions on invertebrate colonisation of riparian leaf detritus in intermittent streams. Aquatic Sci. 75:285–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Argüello R, Cornejo A, Pearson RG, Boyero L. 2010. Spatial and temporal variation of stream communities in a human-affected tropical watershed. Ann Limnol-Int J Lim. 46:149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva DRO, Ligeiro R, Hughes RM, Callisto M. 2014. Visually determined stream mesohabitats influence benthic macroinvertebrate assessments in headwater streams. Environ Monit Assess. 186:5479–5488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley EH, Powers SM, Lottig NR. 2010. The evolving legacy of disturbance in stream ecology: concepts, contributions, and coming challenges. J North Am Benthological Soc. 29:67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayer DL. 2006. Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. J North Am Benthological Soc. 25:271–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suga CM, Tanaka MO. 2013. Influence of a forest remnant on macroinvertebrate communities in a degraded tropical stream. Hydrobiologia. 703:203–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney BW, Bott TL, Jackson JK, Kaplan LA, Newbold JD, Standley LJ, Hession WC, Horwitz RJ. 2004. Riparian deforestation, stream narrowing, and loss of stream ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101(39):14132–14137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka MO, De Souza ALT, Moschini LE, De Oliveira AK. 2016. Influence of watershed land use and riparian characteristics on biological indicators of stream water quality in southeastern Brazil. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 216:333–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka MO, Ribas AC, De Souza ALT. 2006. Macroinvertebrate succession during leaf litter breakdown in a perennial karstic river in Western Brazil. Hydrobiologia. 568:493–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkin JD, Arimoro FO, Haase P. 2016. Exploring stream communities in a tropical biodiversity hotspot: biodiversity, regional occupancy, niche characteristics and environmental correlates. Biodivers Conserv. 25:975–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkin JD, Death RG, Collier KJ. 2013. Do productivity and disturbance interact to modulate macroinvertebrate diversity in streams? Hydrobiologia. 701:159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente R, Vettorazzi C. 2005. Avaliação da estrutura florestal na bacia hidrográfica do Rio Corumbataí, SP Forest structure assessment in the Corumbataí river basin, SP. Sci For. 68:45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker RH. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr. 30:279–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM. 1971. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wood P, Armitage P. 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environ Manage. 21:203–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DH, Reeves JH. 1992. On the meaning and measurement of nestedness of species assemblages. Oecologia. 92:416–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar